I have read the book and it is actually really cool.
Not babies but children are often more open to unconventional ideas.
Because "convention" is learned, not inherent
I guess if you're taught that things can be in two places at once, can appear and disappear at random, and all sorts of other spooky weirdness, that would seem normal. Magic would lose a lot of charm, though.
"So he made his assistant disappear. So what? She probably just teleported somewhere using quantum entanglement."
You're on the fast lane to become “that kid” at school, for sure. “Have you seen the new superman? He shot lasers from his eyes! How cool was that!” “Laser? He must have admirable pupils, alright, but… what's so special about focused light, eh?”
The dad is laughing while pretending to have the slightest fucking clue about what the book says.
If the book title was "Kubernetes for Babies", we'd probably get the same reaction
Full stack for babies shudders
It's never too early to prepare children for today's life.
My brother in Jod, Bukowski isn’t even suitable for most grown ups
Can be complemented with
Does he want the baby to get shot by Will Smith?
I am wondering who is the originator of this dumbass idea of trying to teach babies and 1-2 year olds advanced science. It really plays well on the parents' fantasies about their child being the most important person of the next century
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.
