299
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 177 points 6 months ago

I blame McConnell for Carlson and trump

[-] myrrh@ttrpg.network 3 points 6 months ago

"The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote."

[-] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

No but they could slip on me and smack their head and decide to change their life's goals to being the best banana salesmen.... Or buy up all the umbrellas and corner the market. Or you know....

[-] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 115 points 6 months ago

great so two people who are not currently in government have more pull than the whole of Congress. ffs I hate it here

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 7 points 6 months ago

Kind of lacks the nuance of a House of 435 Representatives and Senate of 100 who write, amend, vote, rewrite, vote again, discuss, and vote a third time with a majority or sometimes even a 2/3rd majority in order to pass laws. All of this in one of the most politically polarized times in history.

You don't need to have more sway than the whole of congress. You just need to convince like 80 people and then nothing will ever get done again.

[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 73 points 6 months ago

Oh so now Mitch is back to criticizing trump again? What did Mitch get rebooted again and forget endorsing him a few weeks ago?

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 33 points 6 months ago

I have one guess. There’s absolutely 0 evidence for it so maybe I am just fooling myself that it is plausible when it isn’t.

But, a bunch of people have been suddenly turning anti-Russia recently who were previously very cool with it. Something changed. My unfounded theory is, more criminal charges are coming for people who have been agent-ing for Russia, and McConnell and the other lawful evils are trying to just emphasize that they’re nowhere near those charges, no how sir.

[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago
[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 5 points 6 months ago

Probably I am dreaming yes

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

But, a bunch of people have been suddenly turning anti-Russia recently

Did the Russian checks start bouncing?

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 8 points 6 months ago

I mean, honestly? That might be another explanation. Some combination of sanctions, effective counterintelligence, or "Ukraine is getting their weapons so what the hell are we paying you for" blocking the payments.

Russia's not running out of money any time soon (not on the scale of the laughably small amounts that it takes to corrupt people in the US government), but there are other reasons why people might not be getting their checks anymore. And Rand Paul is still going strong, where he's one of the people who's just motivated by some absolutely cockeyed internal compass that gravitates unerringly to the wrong answer on absolutely everything, so that would track, too.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Such a beautiful description of Rand Paul.

Its like he knows the rught way but will not act that way unless paid to.

Very liberdashian.

[-] whereisk@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

With the Europeans dismantling a propaganda and bribe network Europe-wide, the Germans catching their far-right taking money directly from Russia, I suspect they're hedging their bets.

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

EU seized the money so the bribes are drying up.

[-] solidgrue@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

The wind is shifting, that's for sure.

[-] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Most of the money goes to US weapons manufacturers. The weapons manufacturers are very big political donors.

You can create all the hoo har you want, to “energise your base”, but when to music stops and it’s time to vote , you do as you are told and get that public money into hands of the defence contractors as quickly as you can.

MTG found this out yesterday when she was publicly called an idiot : unhinged rant about Jewish space lasers ? No problemo. Put $90bn of weapons money at risk ? You’re a lunatic.

[-] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Latest check hasn't cleared yet. Give it a week and he'll have flopped again.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 44 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

How do you do, fellow non traitors

Boy I sure am upset about all the traitoring around here, how dare they, amirite?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 42 points 6 months ago

Look, Moscow Mitch can bite my shiny metal ass on exactly 100% of the issues except support for Ukraine. I’m glad he’s still onboard even though I really, really, really don’t like him at all.

Still. Let’s get russia packed up and kicked out and then we’ll get back to everything else.

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

I really don't care what any politician says. Trump and Carlson do not hold elected offices, they should have zero say in any government matter, foreign or domestic. Their alarmingly close alignment with particularly adversarial foreign entities should further disqualify anything they say.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I’d call him Moscow’s Bitch, but we don’t want to confuse him with Marge.

[-] halferect@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

Did mitch forget who he is? Or is this a new bug in his reboot. The guy spent 4th of July in Moscow, he created tucker and Trump and has ruled the gop for decades

[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 22 points 6 months ago

Then maybe you should have convicted him when he was impeached the first time?

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 11 points 6 months ago

Or the second

[-] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

This is an apology to the arms industry donors .

[-] tearsintherain@leminal.space 16 points 6 months ago
[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Damn that Dutch Oven!

[-] audiomodder@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 6 months ago

That guy that endorsed Trump? Not me. That was Rich McConnell.

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Mitch McConnell? No. No. No. You got it all wrong. I’m Bitch McConnell”

[-] Blackout@kbin.run 11 points 6 months ago

Moscow Mitch blaming everyone but himself

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 6 months ago

McConnell is the expert on delaying things, he would know.

[-] HorreC@kbin.social 7 points 6 months ago

why do two people that are not in government have anything to do with this, and if they are give advice it should be declared that they are lobbyists for these things.

[-] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago

There was also this guy named Mitch McConnel involved.

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

FuckConnell says what?

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON — Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell on Tuesday celebrated the impending passage of $60 billion in U.S. aid to Ukraine ahead of a final vote, while lamenting the fact that it took months to secure enough Republican support to land it.

At a press conference, the Kentucky Republican pinpointed two men responsible for that delay: former Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson and former President Donald Trump.

“I think the former president had sort of mixed views on” Ukraine aid, he added, before alluding to the failed attempt to add border security provisions to the bill, “which requires you to deal with Democrats, and then a number of our members thought it wasn’t good enough.”

The top Senate Republican has been an ardent supporter of Ukraine aid and battled a slew of conservative voices who have sought to block it.

McConnell said he remains committed to working to help regain a Republican Senate majority, despite his plans to step back from leadership at the end of the year.

McConnell said part of the blame falls on the Biden administration for not recognizing the need earlier and reacting, but acknowledged Congress should’ve acted more quickly.


The original article contains 682 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

FOAD, traitor.

this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
299 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19097 readers
1972 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS