202
submitted 5 months ago by mox@lemmy.sdf.org to c/news@lemmy.world
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 129 points 5 months ago

this seems illegal.

Assuming somebody other than google owns the phone (The individual, the carrier.) that now becomes theft.

[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 22 points 5 months ago

They have enough money to be above the law.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 32 points 5 months ago

This behavior isn’t unique to Google either; Samsung and Apple also engage in similar anti-consumer conduct. For example, in the report about Samsung mentioned earlier, it was found that Samsung requires independent repair stores to disassemble a customer’s product if it has a non-OEM part.

wat

Give me a break OEMs wtf

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 32 points 5 months ago

This is one of the many reasons why I advise people never to buy anything directly from Google and always go through a retailer. You basically have zero recourse with Google. If a retailer screws you over you can at least charge back as a last resort but Google has your account hostage. What can you do if they just decide to pull some bullshit like this?

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

This was the straw that broke yada yada, and why I moved my data out of G a few years ago. If I pulled a cb and they axed my account, I'd lose some gift card info in gPay (that I have backed up in bitwarden), some YT uploads, and the general account, but nothing of value.

But most people aren't in my situation, unfortunately.

this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
202 points (98.1% liked)

News

23296 readers
1301 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS