475
"I should have let everyone know I accepted a bribe. Not like you'll do anything about it anyway, suckers!"
The only Justice to be impeached in US history was Associate Justice Samuel Chase in 1805. The House of Representatives passed Articles of Impeachment against him; however, he was acquitted by the Senate.
They're the American Mullahs. I've been calling them that for a while and I hope it catches on eventually.
I thought they were Muslim clergy. What am I missing?
The Mullahs of Iran cannot be replaced no matter what they do. They are also the final arbiters on all matters.
Gotcha. That’s a fair comparison.
I should let everyone know, I am taking bribes.
"I used to take a lot of bribes and I should have let everyone know. I mean, I still do, but I used to, too."
That’s exactly how I read that title. Oh, I can see there was no need to be sneaky. Apologies.
Justice Clarence Thomas can choke on a cock.
To be fair, any of us can choke on a cock.
You're right. Clarence has no gag reflex.
It's true, I saw that man take 3 cocks at the same time.
You go to some really weird parties
So does Clarence
Sure but he's conservative so it's pretty much a given that he's got some secret kink he's trying to cover for by telling others what they can do with their bodies. Having 3 dicks in his mouth is probably the most normal sexual act he's done in ages, instead of the usual underage amputees vomiting in his asshole or something like that
God I love this conversation thread.
You can see this at any billionaire party in the DC area.
Apparently you also go to some really weird parties. I never get invited to billionaire orgies :(
And you never will, with a gag reflex like that.
I'm still good for butt stuff though
Not just people. The dogs we had back on the farm did a great job of protecting chickens, but every once in a while they would do the opposite and kill a chicken for themselves. I always thought it was fair. There was an instance where Lady was choking on a mouthful of feathers.
It was a peanut farm. Ironically my spouse is deathly allergic. On the bright side, it gets you out of family gatherings.
That was a wild ride!
Okay, so when can we expect you to take off the robe and clear out? And when can we expect meaningful ethics reform on the court, you know, the place where ethics should be paramount?
And when can we expect meaningful ethics reform on the court, you know, the place where ethics should be paramount?
I have an official reply from the Justices to your inquiry:
"lol, get fucked, pleb"
That sounds about right...
"I have not yet begun to defile myself."
Oh, ok.
So, you're going to resign now, yes?
South Park ISP Support Guy (while rubbing his nipples): I'm sorry. We're just so sorry.
Shouldn't this be "…acknowledges he should not have accepted free trips from billionaire donor"?
I don't know all the intricacy of US politics, but people in position getting shit-tons of gifts in exchange of "nothing, really, just a friendly gesture" should raise some eyebrows.
Wait, I thought this was the onion
Maybe he should step down about it
I would be fascinated to see how this issue would be litigated up through the supreme court.
omg he admit it
He knows it won't change jack shit: he can't be held accountable, and it's not like he'll magically grow a spine either
He should have drank himself to death, but alas.
There is still time.
Next time in court try:
Your honor, I “inadvertently failed to realize" ...
He is just a high ranking Sugarbaby. Get these bozos out of here.
this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
475 points (99.0% liked)
News
30984 readers
1754 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS