722

Humans and Stripes (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 2 years ago by ink@sh.itjust.works to c/curatedtumblr@sh.itjust.works

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 49 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 130 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Apparently there's no actual evidence to suggest cats can see them. Lame

[-] 18107@aussie.zone 53 points 2 years ago

Even if cats could talk, and could definately see the stripes, I'm convinced that they wouldn't tell anyone.

[-] Crapattf2@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

They'd gossip about them with other cats behind your back

"Kevin's stripes make him look like a moron"

\ Kevin whistling while sweeping the kitchen oblivious to the fact that he has stripes let alone stupid looking ones and that cats can talk

[-] PissinSelfNdriveway@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 years ago

Don't fucking ruin it Gary.

[-] ironeagl@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago

Their name is Steeve.

[-] GCostanzaStepOnMe@feddit.de 65 points 2 years ago

I know it's the wrong sub for this opinion, but that's a fucking annoying way to post.

[-] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 years ago

It's convenient for mobile users, I can see how it would be frustrating for people with landscape/horizontal monitor though.

[-] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 years ago

I am using google chrome and I found that opening the post's image in a new tab, clicking on the image once to zoom in, and then adjusting the zoom setting to 250% made the image easier to view and scroll. I hope that helps.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

As aliens describing us? Or a large screenshot?

[-] cubedsteaks@lemmy.today -1 points 2 years ago

desktop here, was easy as hell lol

[-] FarceMultiplier@lemmy.ca 53 points 2 years ago

If cats can see them, then surely we can make tech that converts those wavelengths to one's humans can see, so we can admire each other's stripes.

[-] xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The only actual use for Apple's Vision Pro headset

[-] InfiniWheel@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago

And open whole new untapped method of racism

[-] healer_56@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago

not sure i can follow, but is this true or some collective trolling/joking/pranking or something of the sort ?

[-] ebits21@lemmy.ca 59 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blaschko's_lines?wprov=sfti1

At least the pattern part seems true.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

This should be at the top.

[-] JackOfAllTraits@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago

This is a wild ride

[-] dmention7@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago

Try it again while high... I am shook 🤯

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

I believe "bruh" is the appropriate gender neutral pronoun.

[-] soviettaters@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Bruh is interchangable with bro

[-] elxeno@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago

How do you do, fellow striped humans?

[-] PissinSelfNdriveway@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago

Theeee fuck?

[-] InfiniteStruggle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

Anyone know whether we can see these stripes in some way? IR cameras? Ultraviolet spectrum?

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

My Charlotte after I asked her to tell me what kind of stripes I have:

[-] snowyday@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

You guys are twins!

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Huh?

[-] snowyday@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Just a little joke that you both have similar markings

like this

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Fair enough, but that's not me lol 😁

[+] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social -35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sort of off topic. But if you are putting a disclaimer that something is "gender neutral", just use a different word. Y'all? Fam? 😂

For those that say these are inherently gender neutral, how many bros have you slept with? Would you sleep with a man? This is all literally patriarchy. Male isn't the "default" human experience.

[-] yeather@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 years ago

Bro and dude have effectively become gender neutral for referring to someone. It's not patriarchy, it's how a language evolves.

[-] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago

I agree on dude, and can see bro coming but at present in my daily life bruh is the neutral. And I do hope it wins or else it's mankind all over again

[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

I call some of my female friends "dude." What's that count as, Language Arbiter?

[-] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Firstly, does thinking a "(gender neutral)" at the end of sentance is really weird and awkward truly make me the language police? Come on, it's clunky at best, a weird lazy lamshapde to virtue signal at worst. Just use something else if your intent is to have something gender neutral.

But to answer your question. If your lady friends don't mind being called dude, then why should I?

[-] I_Miss_Daniel@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

I read that as lampshade.

[-] ChrisMcMillan@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Me two

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago

Are your female friends city people who've travelled to a rural area?

[-] Katzastrophe@feddit.de 16 points 2 years ago

Your argument doesn't really work, because 'bro' isn't a word used to describe sex partners, in the same vein, you would never say "I've slept with the boys", but you could use the sentence "I was hanging out with the boys".

[-] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Sure, I'm not really trying to play a semantics game so much as call attention to the fact that these are inherently gendered terms. If you were to say "hanging out with the girls (gender neutral)" or say "hanging out with the boys (gender neutral)", you are just being awkward and should just change the word.

[-] Katzastrophe@feddit.de -2 points 2 years ago

That's fair I suppose, to me, "bro" is an inherently gender neutral term, though "girls" is gender neutral to me in the same vein.

Adding on the 'gender neutral' is kinda redundant, and I can see why it would be annoying, actually, it's annoying me too now, because if the writer simply used "bros" and not "bros (gender neutral)", the expression's gender (gender/non-gendered) would not have been moved to gendered, and most people would understand it to be a gender neutral expression.

[-] Sacha@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Bro.

[-] match@pawb.social 8 points 2 years ago

I fuck bros all the time but I'm gay and non-binary

[-] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

Genuine question because that confused the heck out of my brain.

What does gay and non-binary together mean? Are you only attracted to other non-binary people?

[-] match@pawb.social -1 points 2 years ago

I had a straight non-binary friend once; ze was small and androgynous and ze would generally date "lumberjack witch" enbies or other people who were differently gendered from zir.

[-] cubedsteaks@lemmy.today 3 points 2 years ago

uh, I definitely want to sleep with my bro's

[-] nottheengineer@feddit.de -1 points 2 years ago

What are you on about? There's not even a male pronoun in the whole post

[-] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

Look at Tumblr post #5 in the image.

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023

722 points (98.0% liked)

Curated Tumblr

5167 readers

2 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

Here are some OCR tools to assist you in transcribing posts:

web
iOS
FOSS Android Recs per u/m_f@discuss.online: 1 , 2

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Apytele@sh.itjust.works

ethaver@kbin.earth