551
Cambrian ruleiod (lemmy.world)
submitted 10 months ago by aaro@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Bezier@suppo.fi 89 points 10 months ago

The spore period

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] shatterling@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago
[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago
[-] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 43 points 10 months ago

They managed to procreate successfully. Can you say the same about yourself?

[-] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago

This is the peak of evolution. It's been downhill ever since.

[-] bamfic@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago
[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

Hard agree.

Some evil cabal intolerant to vast variety of species orchestrated mass extinction so that now we are all this uniform fish-bird things.

I want to go back.

[-] Barzaria@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Fun fact, prior to the Cambrian explosion animals did not have hard parts. There is a theory in a book called "in the blink of an eye " that some animal evolved eyes followed quickly by the evolution hard parts and the Cambrian explosion. They're were three phyla of animals before the Cambrian explosion and whatever the current number is now I think it's like 28 after the Cambrian explosion which took place in a very short period of time. link to book edited comment to have better search

[-] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago

Your “link to the book” seems to be a link to a search from that title with a billion results that aren’t the book you’ve described.

[-] Barzaria@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Go home, evolution, you're drunk... or tripping balls on a heroic dose, sounds more like it.

[-] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

Those are images made from the data recovered from their fossils. I guess they didn't look like that at all. If the same process was done with human skeletons we'd have a very good laugh.

[-] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 10 months ago

Those are trilobites, part of the arthropod phylum. They have exoskeletons (i.e no inner bones), so they would probably look quite a lot like their fossils. Comparing them to vertebrates like humans (or dinosaurs, or whatever) in this context makes no sense.

[-] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

And an exoskeleton can't have anything covering it because... ?

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Because that's what the "exo" part means.

[-] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It's not a phase mom this is who I am

[-] urheber@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 months ago
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
551 points (100.0% liked)

196

17586 readers
497 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS