349
Back to the landowner class, eh?
Still have to come up with a way to get the renters off next.
Rent increases moving along nicely.
And now that homelessness is illegal, the ~~prison~~ slave labor force will be growing
“The pursuit of happiness…” if you’re a property owning white male. Going back to our roots, unfortunately.
Honestly Republicans are among the lowest income families and most of them rent, requiring land ownership could very well cost Trump the presidency.
And exactly no legal case will be made in relation to this, because you can only make a case if you have standing, and what homeless person has the time or money to do that?
Yes, time, because it takes time to appear in court and work with attorneys, and when you're homeless, you kind of need to spend that time just getting by.
This is what groups like the ACLU are for, though I'd imagine that kind of help really depends on the strategic context. It's difficult to make any case in this climate knowing the highest court is so corrupted.
You'd still have to find a willing petitioner who has standing, and is able to go all the way through the (likely) multi-year process.
Wait a second, I bet you could do that with a vandweller or an RV retiree? But then I am also thinking ... how do you determine what district or state someone is qualified to be registered in if they don't have an address? This gets complicated, I think.
Most homeless people do not start homeless, so they will have established residency somewhere at some point in their lives. Even if it hasn’t been updated since they were kids. You are always assumed a resident of a place until you change it to something else. It doesn’t really expire
Whatever method they use to charge homeless people with crimes I suppose. They might have to set up a PO box or something somewhere.
Crimes are charged where the crime took place, where you live doesn't matter.
You can be charged with a crime in a place you don’t have residence.
Yes, I'm saying if you can process someone for a crime without a home address you can do it for a lawsuit. It's not some insurmountable hurdle.
You can’t, it’s different. Charging someone with a crime is easy, and even if the person doesn’t talk or have ID they are given a John Doe identifier and a random number and will go through the criminal proceedings.
In civil cases that information cannot be left blank, otherwise a clerk cannot file it and the courts won’t place it on a docket.
The right violates the constitution all the time without consequences. Rule of law really is an illusion at this point.
Always has been an illusion.
More just selective enforcement
Yet again they are targeting the vulnerable of society, and trying to disenfranchise them. But if course, the cruelty is the point.
Golly, that sounds unconstitutional as fuck...
The sad part is it's probably not. We started off only letting land owners vote, I have a feeling were like one self serving interpretation of the law away from going back.
“I don’t see anywhere in this constitution that says we can’t throw people off the voter rolls! Now, when does my vacation come in?” - Uncle Thomas
I bet I can guess the skin color of the average homeless person's skin color in Georgia.
Since when did skin colours have skin colours?
Freckles
Just make everyone in the US get a national ID number.
And I don't mean social security number, but a real ID number with checksums and protections built in.
I guess the rights of Americans are just suggestions. fucking assholes.
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
349 points (99.4% liked)
News
23301 readers
1043 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS