45
So the NYT can use the active voice after all.
An assailant ran over the 80-year-old man with an all-terrain vehicle, leaving him badly injured.
All this hand wringing over political violence when someone runs over (not kills) and 80 year old with and ATV, but crickets and "it's unclear what the suspect's motivation was" whenever some chud does a mass shooting.
Chief Tami Sleeman of the Hancock police said the incident was one of three involving the 22-year-old suspect last weekend. He also used a shovel to destroy the windows of a parked truck with a sticker supporting Mr. Trump, the chief said, and vandalized the tires of a parked vehicle that had a sticker supporting law enforcement
If Aaron Sorkin wrote Falling Down
I thought the American legal precedent is that drivers are allowed to kill pedestrians?
*left wing or liberal pedestrians
Is it castle doctrine if you live in your car?
I believe the precedent inherited from English common law is that if you don't own a house, you can be legally killed for any reason
Not if politics is involved.
Not if you have a good reaaon
cops and trump supporters gaslighting about how "we don't want political violence" uh sure you don't. just when it's against you. lmfao.
Some unfortunate ambiguity with the pronouns in the title, I thought it was the 80 year old who committed suicide at first.
shouldve just put a banana peel in front of his door idk
He'll get over it
Aww. Rip based valdalism and vehicular assault kid. 
Where's the liberal driller when you need him? How hard is it to kill an 80 year old?
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
45 points (97.9% liked)
chapotraphouse
13949 readers
866 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS