535
submitted 2 years ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

I watched ABC FAKE NEWS this morning, both lightweight reporter Jonathan Carl’s(K?) ridiculous and biased interview of Tom Cotton (who was fantastic!), and their so-called Panel of Trump Haters, and I ask, why would I do the Debate against Kamala Harris on that network?

Who's surprised he's trying to chicken out?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Geek_King@lemmy.world 119 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If he does drop out of the debate again, I bet they could get him to recommit by going all Biff Tannen on his ass:

"What's the matter McTrump? Chicken?"

He'll bristle, and say he's no chicken and agree to debate Kamala.

In all seriousness, I was surprised agreed to debate her at all, given that he has nothing to gain. Best cash scenario, he tries the same approach he used with Biden, turning his mouth into a fire hose of lies, and Biden couldn't keep up. With Kamala, she'd just laugh at his lies, and actually refute him with facts, he'd look just awful in comparison.

At this point I doubt he'll actually show up to the debate.

[-] cowfodder@lemmy.world 87 points 2 years ago

One of the issues he has is that ABC and the Dems want real time fact checking.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 74 points 2 years ago

The nerve! Not allowing him to just stand there and lie without being challenged!

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

How would real-time fact checking even work? Would the moderators actually do their job for once and call it out, or would they just do little VH1/"Pop Up Video"-style graphics where they would highlight whether they would try to correct the record on certain things being said?

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 27 points 2 years ago

Here's my proposal.

During each candidate's first turn to speak, no fact checks are shown, but the fact checkers will use the other candidate's turn to come up with corrections. Then when it's the first candidate's turn again, the start of that their speaking time is used to read the corrections from their previous statement. If the corrections take the whole speaking slot, too bad so sad.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

If corrections also rollover into the next speaking window, Donald could just do his first slot and then go golfing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Either would be better than what's happening now.

[-] HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

Would the moderators actually do their job for once and call it out

That's actually not the job of moderators. This idea that moderators should do fact-checking only came about in 2016 because of Trump.

The network probably should have a team of fact-checkers. But fact checking in real time isn't easy.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

I would like to have the moderators do anything at all, though, that would be nice. Like cut off a candidate who goes over time. Maybe force candidates to answer the question asked or forfeit their time.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Hopefully both, and there's a Lie-O-Meter that determines how truthful a statement is as its being read, and then a counter of provably false statements made

Not like a here is a one in a billion outlier so the truth is a lie. If crime is down, but up in a small, specific area, the statement "crime is down" would be true.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

"I heard McDonalds has a new menu item now, they're calling them Chicken McTrumplets... Bawk... bawk... bawk... bawk"

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

I never thought he'd go through with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 113 points 2 years ago

Great. Give Harris the time slot for a big town hall speech and Q&A. Every 15 minutes, read a reminder to everyone watching that Trump declined to debate.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Keep the two podiums and put a wax figure of Trump in a chicken suit behind the other one. Put the camera on it with dead air for a few seconds every time it's his turn to speak.

[-] notabot@lemm.ee 31 points 2 years ago

Use cheap, low density wax and it'll slowly melt under the studio lights over to course of the program, which would be hilarious.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 26 points 2 years ago

The chicken suit is too on the nose. And a cardboard cutout is probably way cheaper than a wax statue.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There's no such thing as "too" on the nose when it comes to needling Trump and his gaggle of dipshits.

I agree with the cardboard cutout part, though: half-assed shoddiness represents him more authentically and he deserves no better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] teft@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Ice sculpture so as the night progresses the sculpture gets sadder looking.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

I am betting that she will be there whether he is or not. No reason to miss an opportunity like that.

[-] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 years ago

Just do the debate, give his time to a ticker that just says “trump was too scared to be here, I concede the rest of my time.” For every question.

Seems fair.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

Christopher Hitchens once debated himself on religion when his debate opponent didn't show up. It was pretty brilliant.

I'm trying to find the YouTube video, but I can't find it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 83 points 2 years ago

I didn't expect this meme to come up again so soon. /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 61 points 2 years ago

But he wants to debate on Fox. The station that was held legally liable for lying for him. The station that has to admit to being "entertainment" not news. Yeah, that's a better choice.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 56 points 2 years ago

Yep. Donald is too weak and cowardly.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 27 points 2 years ago

It's the bone spurs

[-] d33pblu3g3n3@lemmy.world 48 points 2 years ago

Donald Trump is a coward. But we all knew that already.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago

Why did Donald Trump cross the road?

He was running away from a debate with Harris.

[-] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago

Keep running you fucking coward

[-] 4lan@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm so glad they don't have any time to replace him. Almost every right leaning person I know is so irritable and volatile lately. They know what's coming

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] misterundercoat@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago
[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 years ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 34 points 2 years ago
[-] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

Orange Chicken

[-] Wildfathom9@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

Trump considers dropping out of having his dumb ass handed to him.

[-] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Make him afraid some more

St. Alia of the Knife

[-] teft@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

Fear is the mind killer, as they say. And trump doesn't have much mind so it shouldn't take much fear.

[-] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

What an absolute coward. Isn't it the conservative maga "tough guy" crowd who calls everybody pussies? Is trump not being a total pussy?

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 years ago

Trump just upset because it turns out facts don't care about his feelings.

[-] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 years ago

He can’t do the debate because of woke. And bone spurs.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Woke is old and busted now - DEI is where they're at now. Still the same meaningless racist nonsense the way they use it though.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 21 points 2 years ago

"What we really need is an honest debate with principled moderators on a network built on trust and seeking veracity of all claims: Fox News! Only the most Trustworthy™ will do, Sean Hannity and Laura Inbread... wait... Ingrate... No.... Ingram! Right right Ingram."

[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 years ago

No where near enough random capitalization to make that believable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 years ago

I think literally everyone called this one.

Like, even his biggest supporters didn't expect him to not chicken out.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

lol what a bitch

[-] skeezix@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Bok Bok Bok

[-] Xatolos@reddthat.com 13 points 2 years ago

Wait, Don Old is dropping out of a debate (again) with Harris? Weird

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Smells like his adult diapers are already full ;-)

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
535 points (97.7% liked)

News

36429 readers
1118 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS