535
submitted 3 months ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

I watched ABC FAKE NEWS this morning, both lightweight reporter Jonathan Carl’s(K?) ridiculous and biased interview of Tom Cotton (who was fantastic!), and their so-called Panel of Trump Haters, and I ask, why would I do the Debate against Kamala Harris on that network?

Who's surprised he's trying to chicken out?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Geek_King@lemmy.world 119 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If he does drop out of the debate again, I bet they could get him to recommit by going all Biff Tannen on his ass:

"What's the matter McTrump? Chicken?"

He'll bristle, and say he's no chicken and agree to debate Kamala.

In all seriousness, I was surprised agreed to debate her at all, given that he has nothing to gain. Best cash scenario, he tries the same approach he used with Biden, turning his mouth into a fire hose of lies, and Biden couldn't keep up. With Kamala, she'd just laugh at his lies, and actually refute him with facts, he'd look just awful in comparison.

At this point I doubt he'll actually show up to the debate.

[-] cowfodder@lemmy.world 87 points 3 months ago

One of the issues he has is that ABC and the Dems want real time fact checking.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 74 points 3 months ago

The nerve! Not allowing him to just stand there and lie without being challenged!

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

How would real-time fact checking even work? Would the moderators actually do their job for once and call it out, or would they just do little VH1/"Pop Up Video"-style graphics where they would highlight whether they would try to correct the record on certain things being said?

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 27 points 3 months ago

Here's my proposal.

During each candidate's first turn to speak, no fact checks are shown, but the fact checkers will use the other candidate's turn to come up with corrections. Then when it's the first candidate's turn again, the start of that their speaking time is used to read the corrections from their previous statement. If the corrections take the whole speaking slot, too bad so sad.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

If corrections also rollover into the next speaking window, Donald could just do his first slot and then go golfing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Either would be better than what's happening now.

[-] HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

Would the moderators actually do their job for once and call it out

That's actually not the job of moderators. This idea that moderators should do fact-checking only came about in 2016 because of Trump.

The network probably should have a team of fact-checkers. But fact checking in real time isn't easy.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

I would like to have the moderators do anything at all, though, that would be nice. Like cut off a candidate who goes over time. Maybe force candidates to answer the question asked or forfeit their time.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Hopefully both, and there's a Lie-O-Meter that determines how truthful a statement is as its being read, and then a counter of provably false statements made

Not like a here is a one in a billion outlier so the truth is a lie. If crime is down, but up in a small, specific area, the statement "crime is down" would be true.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

"I heard McDonalds has a new menu item now, they're calling them Chicken McTrumplets... Bawk... bawk... bawk... bawk"

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I never thought he'd go through with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 113 points 3 months ago

Great. Give Harris the time slot for a big town hall speech and Q&A. Every 15 minutes, read a reminder to everyone watching that Trump declined to debate.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 51 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Keep the two podiums and put a wax figure of Trump in a chicken suit behind the other one. Put the camera on it with dead air for a few seconds every time it's his turn to speak.

[-] notabot@lemm.ee 31 points 3 months ago

Use cheap, low density wax and it'll slowly melt under the studio lights over to course of the program, which would be hilarious.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 26 points 3 months ago

The chicken suit is too on the nose. And a cardboard cutout is probably way cheaper than a wax statue.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There's no such thing as "too" on the nose when it comes to needling Trump and his gaggle of dipshits.

I agree with the cardboard cutout part, though: half-assed shoddiness represents him more authentically and he deserves no better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] teft@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Ice sculpture so as the night progresses the sculpture gets sadder looking.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

I am betting that she will be there whether he is or not. No reason to miss an opportunity like that.

[-] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 24 points 3 months ago

Just do the debate, give his time to a ticker that just says “trump was too scared to be here, I concede the rest of my time.” For every question.

Seems fair.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

Christopher Hitchens once debated himself on religion when his debate opponent didn't show up. It was pretty brilliant.

I'm trying to find the YouTube video, but I can't find it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 83 points 3 months ago

I didn't expect this meme to come up again so soon. /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 61 points 3 months ago

But he wants to debate on Fox. The station that was held legally liable for lying for him. The station that has to admit to being "entertainment" not news. Yeah, that's a better choice.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago

Yep. Donald is too weak and cowardly.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 27 points 3 months ago

It's the bone spurs

[-] d33pblu3g3n3@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago

Donald Trump is a coward. But we all knew that already.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago

Why did Donald Trump cross the road?

He was running away from a debate with Harris.

[-] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago

Keep running you fucking coward

[-] 4lan@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm so glad they don't have any time to replace him. Almost every right leaning person I know is so irritable and volatile lately. They know what's coming

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] misterundercoat@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago
[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 34 points 3 months ago
[-] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

Orange Chicken

[-] Wildfathom9@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

Trump considers dropping out of having his dumb ass handed to him.

[-] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Make him afraid some more

St. Alia of the Knife

[-] teft@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Fear is the mind killer, as they say. And trump doesn't have much mind so it shouldn't take much fear.

[-] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

What an absolute coward. Isn't it the conservative maga "tough guy" crowd who calls everybody pussies? Is trump not being a total pussy?

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 3 months ago

Trump just upset because it turns out facts don't care about his feelings.

[-] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 3 months ago

He can’t do the debate because of woke. And bone spurs.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Woke is old and busted now - DEI is where they're at now. Still the same meaningless racist nonsense the way they use it though.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 21 points 3 months ago

"What we really need is an honest debate with principled moderators on a network built on trust and seeking veracity of all claims: Fox News! Only the most Trustworthy™ will do, Sean Hannity and Laura Inbread... wait... Ingrate... No.... Ingram! Right right Ingram."

[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 16 points 3 months ago

No where near enough random capitalization to make that believable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 months ago

I think literally everyone called this one.

Like, even his biggest supporters didn't expect him to not chicken out.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

lol what a bitch

[-] skeezix@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Bok Bok Bok

[-] Xatolos@reddthat.com 13 points 3 months ago

Wait, Don Old is dropping out of a debate (again) with Harris? Weird

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Smells like his adult diapers are already full ;-)

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
535 points (97.7% liked)

News

23388 readers
1775 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS