474
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 113 points 2 months ago

School of Satan incoming...

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago

Going to have the best band class in all of Ohio.

🤘

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

Looks like midwestern metals back on the menu boyssss

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Copper, Pyrite, LETS FUCKING GO!

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 2 months ago

law paused while they try to work out how to make it legal to only allow good Christian schools

How it usually goes as soon as another religion tries to do it.

Or puts up religious imagery

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 71 points 2 months ago

If ever a religious institution wanted a clear path to taxation, this is surely it.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 53 points 2 months ago

well if we were following the rules this wouldn't be happening in the first place.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 62 points 2 months ago

This is bad. I'm so tired of people doing bad things. Stop undermining public education you donkeys.

[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

It is pathetic in a way how desperate they are to prop themselves up with taxpayer funds. They know their ideas can't succeed on their own merits. They need state muscle to help coerce people to believe their myths.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Freeloading companies need to be taxed properly.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 59 points 2 months ago

So that’s a prima facie violation of the establishment clause.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 30 points 2 months ago
[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago

Heh, I didn’t realize we had an animated Clarence Thomas gif

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's the judge in the Simpsons if you want to find more

Ahhhhhh I forgot about that character. Haven’t watched the Simpsons in ages

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

It's hilarious that there's a huge chance it's still just Clarence Thomas.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Very ~~faschy~~ facie indeed

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 47 points 2 months ago

I'm a Fiscally Responsible Republican and I'd MUCH RATHER have My Taxdollars go to Church then to STARVING AMERICAN CHILDREN!

-Ohio Republicans knowing their State REJECTED Federal Dollars to Feed Starving Children because it was Deemed Fiscally Irresponsible!

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago

This is literally their thinking.

They alone want to control who gets to benefit from charity. They want to be the arbiters of who is worthy of God's love and who should suffer under his might.

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

When a religion is good, I conceive it will support itself; and when it does not support itself, and God does not take care to support it so that its professors are obliged to call for help of the civil power, 'tis a sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one.

  • Benjamin Franklin, in a letter to Richard Price.
[-] Enthusiasticwhale@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

Man... Whatever happened to separation of church and state

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago
[-] Enthusiasticwhale@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

If we're using tax payer money to fund religious private schools it ain't separated

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

I meant that the separation of church and state got separated from our government.

This is definitely a pretty clear violation of the separation clause.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Oh it’s ok I got a more secular education at a religious school in Ohio than my public school friends did

[-] normalexit@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

So how do I do something to help? I live a few states over and don't want my representatives getting any ideas.

[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

I just donated to Freedom From Religion Foundation, which files lawsuits challenging attempts like this to undermine church-state separation

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 months ago

I've heard that the young'uns call "ohio" things that are weird and cringey.

[-] sarcasticsunrise@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I think it's mainly used to describe something depressing, but weird and cringe work too

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Not quite, Ohio is where the weird or broken things come from

[-] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Can confirm, I live in Canada and my 13 year old daughter and her friends make Ohio jokes

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

"Riots are the language of the voiceless"

-Usually. Sometimes it's just drunken assholes.

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Mostly football (futbol) fans.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Proving why Gen Alpha memes/uses skibidi Ohio.

[-] stinerman@midwest.social 5 points 2 months ago

Gerrymandering is a hell of a drug.

[-] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Problem -

Reaction -

Solution

OHIO

It's not related really, but seeing this article about Ohio doing something stupid reminded me of this article, and specifically the Instagram propaganda shown off within.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago

Propublica - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Propublica:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.propublica.org/article/ohio-taxpayer-money-funding-private-religious-schools
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
474 points (99.6% liked)

politics

19145 readers
2288 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS