196
US navy apologizes for razing of Native Alaska community in late 1800s (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In ceremony in Kake, military acknowledges bombardment of village that destroyed it and led to many deaths

In a ceremony Saturday afternoon, the US navy apologized for firing upon and torching the Alaska Native village of Kake in 1869.

Surrounded by tribal Chilkat weavings, historic photographs and other Lingít artwork in the Kake elementary and high school gymnasium, R Adm Mark B Sucato expressed the military’s regret, in the first of two apologies planned by the military for bombardments of Alaska Native communities in the late 1800s.

“This has been 155 years in the making,” said Joel Jackson, the president of the Organized Village of Kake, of the apology to the Lingít (often known as the Tlingit) people. “It’s becoming real because we never talked about it and now we are.”

The event also included remarks from other tribal leaders and elders, a blessing from the tribe and a navy chaplain, and performances by the local Native Ḵéex’ Ḵwáan Dancers and the navy band.

A second ceremony is planned for 26 October, the 142nd anniversary of the navy’s 1882 bombardment of the nearby village of Angoon.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] superkret@feddit.org 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The "Kake War" was initially started by a US sentry kicking a Lingít chief in the butt when he visited Fort Sitka on an invitation.
The chief then disarmed the sentry and walked away with his rifle.
A detachment was sent into the chief's village, but was repelled by the tribesmen, so the village was put under siege.
They surrendered, but after the surrender, two unarmed Lingít trying to leave in a canoe were killed anyway.
According to their laws and custom, the Lingít demanded retribution in goods for the killing, but were denied, so they captured and executed two fur traders as retaliation.
The USS Saginaw then set sail to "restore order", found all the Lingít villages deserted and put them to the torch, which killed an elderly woman who had stayed behind, and caused the deaths of many Lingít in the following winter since their stores and hunting canoes were destroyed.

[-] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 month ago

I love how they apologise for their crimes after centuries, knowing full well that they will get away with their current atrocities.

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

They'll apologise for current actions in about a century. Seems to work well so far.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Better than just, y'know, never. That's what happens most of the time.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

Never is just as meaningful if the US government doesn't actually stop fucking doing it.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Unless you're counting war materiel sent to the IDF, I'm not sure what villages we've indiscriminately shelled in recent years.

[-] Montagge@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

Iraq and Afghanistan

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

Fighting opposing military forces in a village and indiscriminate shelling of a village are not the same thing. Unless you can think of a time some random village got shelled for no reason?

[-] escapesamsara@lemmings.world 5 points 1 month ago

Yes, the entirety of both wars had indiscriminate shelling of non military targets. The US from every perspective was the bad guys for the last 20 years globally due to their explicit murder of over 1.5 million known civillians

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

Still waiting on that specific example. I'm also a little leery of the "explicit murder of over 1.5 million known civillians" claim. Source on that one?

[-] Montagge@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago
[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

From the first article:

The Kurds told reporters covering the offensive that there were a thousand Islamic State fighters at the mountain base.

While another source disagrees, this is a "he said she said" situation.

From the second:

Ground-launched cluster strikes caused hundreds of civilian casualties across Iraq. Human Rights Watch documented cases in most of the major cities, including al-Hilla, al-Najaf, Karbala’, Baghdad, and Basra. Doctors at local hospitals provided statistics that supported individual testimony of deaths and injuries. The majority of these casualties resulted from the heavy use of cluster munitions in populated areas where soldiers and civilians commingled.

The third quotes the very paragraph above from the second, but quotes around and omits the line about areas where soldiers and civilians comingled.

From the fourth:

Although human-rights activists insist that the coalition could have done more to protect civilians, Townsend is right: unlike Russia, America does not bomb indiscriminately. The U.S. razed an entire city, killing thousands in the process, without committing a single obvious war crime.

Note, US propaganda aside, I absolutely agree that war crimes were committed, specifically with regards to the use of certain types of munitions. This is a separate allegation from deliberate targeting and indiscriminate destruction of exclusively civilian populations though.

War is hell, after all. All war is hell. It always kills civilians if they are present, yet it remains legal if pursued with appropriate "care". It takes more, then, than fighting occuring within residential areas to demonstrate the targeting of civilians.

[-] escapesamsara@lemmings.world 2 points 1 month ago

Wikipedia has brief introductions to both concepts for you since it's the first time you've heard about america's involvement in the middle east.

[-] DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

you really did just refuse to link wikipedia while citing it as your source

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

Uh huh. I'll go "do my own research" right away, thanks.

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The US military shell Native Hawaiian land for "practice" with no intention of cleaning it up. They're not killing anyone but they're basically making native land uninhabitable for anyone else after/if they leave

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, that sorta counts. Definitely shitty.

[-] pageflight@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I would count that, yes.

[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

My Lai would like a word

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -2 points 1 month ago

I don't know why I keep getting surprised at the rampant ignorance of the average liberal, but I do.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Little more likely you've simply been misled. Someone below quoted four sources, and the very best they had was one man's testimony which was contradicted by the Kurds.

Note, the keyword is indiscriminate. Not shells aimed at fighters in a village, but a village with nobody fighting from it. That part is key.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

Bless your heart.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Also they won't even apologise for most of them

[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Never learned about this in my history classes back in school.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago

If they covered every instance of the US military destroying a bunch of native villages, you'd be in history class full time till you retire.

[-] theherk@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The joke only being enhanced by the fact that most of us will never retire.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you did, you'd almost certainly have been taught some bullshit revisionist fiction showing friendly US officials probably eating with the Lingít people and teaching them how to do what the Lingít excelled at.

Honestly given the indignity, it's probably better they aren't mentioned in our K-12 "history"

[-] pageflight@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

No mention of reparations as part of this apology.

Although the community of Angoon received a $90,000 settlement from the Department of the Interior in 1973, it has long sought a formal apology.

Mentioning that previous amount just highlights that they aren't doing more / something significant.

[-] Stern@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Although the community of Angoon received a $90,000 settlement from the Department of the Interior in 1973...

Approximately $638,000 now, after inflation. Do with that knowledge what you will. (I recommend being somewhat upset.)

this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
196 points (98.5% liked)

News

23284 readers
1309 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
dezmd@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
Blackbeard@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world