270
How does that work with the tax exempt status from IRS?
Evangelicals have been trying to get rid of the Johnson Amendment for many years so they can receive tax freedom and engage in politics more freely: https://www.npr.org/2018/03/22/596158332/another-effort-to-get-rid-of-the-johnson-amendment-fails
So they’re ballot harvesting? I thought rePUBEicans were against ballot harvesting. Does that mean that 2000 mules was a DIY video instead of false and misleading information?
Their accusations are usually confessions, after all..
Boy are they going to be upset when they learn what Dejoy did to USPS processing infrastructure putting mail-in ballot processing at risk. Truly a "leopards ate my face" event here.
Nah, they'll just blame Muslims or immigrants or something fucking stupid, they're not intelligent people.
Haitians are eating our ballots!
Oh, damn, I just found my ballot in the basement. Oops!
Can someone explain to me how four years into the Biden administration, the USPS is still saddled with that Trump-era turd?
Podcast I've been listening to for years has been signing off with "Fire DeJoy!!!" on nearly every episode... (The Professional Left)
I need a new podcast, pitch it to me?
Oh, The Professional Left. I meant to add that...
if slate is to be trusted, it's not trivial: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/02/biden-cannot-fire-usps-louis-dejoy.html
The republican party is a pervasive blight on our government.
Tax 'em. They don't get to have religious exemptions AND be proactively politcal for their own gain.
Besides the obvious hypocrisy, one thing to get from this is that conservative leaders understand that you need to organize to win elections. Let's make sure they're out organized
Find how to register to vote for where you are
Find opportunities to volunteer for dems around you and online
Write letters to voters in swing states or in competitive downballot races
They're not skeptical of mail-in ballots, they're skeptical of non conservative mail-in ballots
Religion is a cancer and the ignorant and afraid are its malignant tumors.
I bet they're helping they choose candidates too, but let's not talk about that.
ZOMG, are they doing....ballot harvesting?
/clutches pearls
I thought that when organizations like ACORN did something like this it was going to be the end of civilization and they had to be taken down with nonsense from the likes of James O'Keefe, for the good of mankind?
Churches are social organizing spaces, they have been involved in politics since the very beginning. As long as they are doing it the right way, by encouraging voting but not voting for a particular candidate, and running voter registration drives, driving people to the polls, that's good. We want more people to vote.
It's not hypocritical to once be skeptical and then learn that something is OK. That's called learning.
I blame people for being obtuse when they were complaining with zero evidence that there was a problem, I don't blame people at all for working legally to increase voting.
They often endorse conservative candidates outright or imply who to vote for through heavy social pressure.
often
There's zero evidence that it's happening "often" so I'm mostly using the space to point out that there's more to "church" in America than the white evangelical politics-forward churches they see represented on TV. Those pastors are on TV because they are the exception.
Man you've got me conflicted. On the one hand, Internet edgelord atheists are annoying twats when it comes to projecting their specific Christian trauma onto the world, but that doesn't mean they are wrong about Christianity specifically.
Also not sure if we "want more people to vote." The average American is wildly unqualified to decide the future of a nation.
Not to diminish from your point, yes absentee ballots are good, just
by encouraging voting but not voting for a particular candidate
You know this isn't happening.
Every church I've ever been to has been carefully non-partisan on candidates. It's not just tax status, they don't want to cause parishioners to feel unwelcome because they need the attendance.
I know some churches are being overly political, sure, but I absolutely believe the majority are doing the right thing.
Then you've had good churches. But don't discount something just because you've been lucky.
And I can list as many that I've been to that don't. Anecdotal evidence holds
They're not. Every church I've ever been to has preached that Democrats are demons.
As long as they are doing it the right way, by encouraging voting but not voting for a particular candidate
Yeah that's not what's happening. They get a sermon every Sunday about horrible immigrants and the woke agenda. Then at this event they get told to make sure they vote Christian. It's specifically the evangelical churches and mega churches doing this.
And at least one religious college where I live. They were bussing students to polling stations
Yep. They understand it's about getting their people to vote while making sure the other group doesn't
Associated Press - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Associated Press:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-churches-ballot-gathering-evangelicals-1d1a48c53f8e970fb3f31a7650f200fb
this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
270 points (98.6% liked)
politics
19096 readers
1762 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS