98
Don't worry, I'll be reminding crackers of this in 2028 or 2032 when they inevitably field this bazinga-ghoul against fuckin. God Emperor Bannon or some shit. God death to the settlers, death to the techbros, death to Amerika.
good luck. there's a huge list of heinous shit Kamala has done and the liberals are just ignoring it with bUt TrUmP
Some more of his vetoes, mostly from last year:
-
A union-supported bill that would have banned driverless testing of autonomous trucks
-
A bill that would have banned solitary confinement lasting longer than 15 days - something that the UN considers torture.
They won't care. They'll just say YEAH BUT WHAT ABOUT whoever the Republican candidate is like they always do. This cycle is eternal. Material reality is irrelevant to any and every proud American voter.
And this is why I tell them to their faces I hope I get to watch them die. Amerikans are not my people at this point; give a fuck if I was born here.
I fucking hate my piece of shit governer ao goddamn much
Most newest AI models aren't allowed to be used in the EU, because Meta, Google, etc are training them on random people's personal data. So they just pulled out of the EU, instead of fixing their training data. More or less as a punishment to the EU for daring to regulate AI.
I don’t know that I’d really call being denied access to AI a “punishment,” if people in my region were blocked from using AI I would call that a “blessing”
it's probably so the megacorps with a stiffy for AI throw a hissy fit that they can't "fix" the "skilled labor shortage" with AI
the people with more power, capital, and influence are more likely to be pro-cutting edge technology because they also don't care about potential ramifications on society
Damn, EU won that battle.
Fucking awesome being a burgerlander. I’d like to think of myself as a hardened warrior conditioned by the most grueling conditions worldwide kkkapistan has to offer. Or a hamster if you want to be a douche >:
Democrats being spineless cowards as usual. They're still relentlessly mocked by the same people whose scorn they so vehemently fear. What's even the point?
Democrats please just change your mascot to a chicken, because that's what y'all are.
“I do not believe this is the best approach to protecting the public from real threats posed by the technology," And will offer no real alternatives either as usual
libs will tell you not to let perfect be the enemy of good and then do this
What's the point of passing the bill if they're not willing to override the veto? They're just letting Gavin Newsom be the spoiler, even though others would step up to spoil if he did not
Capitalism was already sending us towards a climate apocalypse whats a little AI apocalypse on top of that?
A treat?
We believe that the most powerful AI models may soon pose severe risks, such as expanded access to biological weapons and cyberattacks on critical infrastructure.
This is hilarious reasoning. Also, how would a kill switch work on open source models?
The danger of these models isn't jailbreaking or a Terminator type scenario. The risk is in job cuts, energy and water consumption, overproduction of hardware, faulty information, and other mundane risks. The only thing that this bill actually does is make companies liable for the harms their models cause, and even isn't that strong as it is the cost of doing business. This is effective altruist infighting.
this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
98 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13686 readers
910 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS