198
submitted 1 year ago by dead@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

That would raise average wages to about $63 an hour from $39 an hour over the life of the contract.

The union and the port operators said in a statement that they would extend their master contract until Jan. 15, 2025 to return to the bargaining table to negotiate all outstanding issues.

https://xcancel.com/MorePerfectUS/status/1841973125996585431

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/ship-queue-grows-us-ports-dockworker-strike-enters-third-day-2024-10-03/

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Walk_On@hexbear.net 85 points 1 year ago

I do hope they vote out their LIB leadership since workers were allowed to cross the picketline to help load military weapons.

[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 89 points 1 year ago

The typical American is unbelievably reactionary, I'd be shocked if the majority of the membership even mildly disapproved of assisting the burger reich.

[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

A majority of Americans support suspending arms sales to Israel. I can’t imagine that’s lower among union members.

[-] TheLastHero@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

they may "disapprove" but Americans aren't gonna betray the troops yet. And if they did they wouldn't be able to handle the heat (the government would literally try to kill them). There's no solidarity with other nations or even other workers in other sectors in the US, they were just striking for themselves.

[-] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

Is there any indication that they care? Or are we wishcasting about the I Love America Union

[-] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 50 points 1 year ago

Ngl it's still kinda bittersweet since they still agreed to load military equipment. Just more chauvinism, but I'm wanting too much for burgereich workers to have solidarity with international workers.

[-] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago

Just more chauvinism, but I'm wanting too much for burgereich workers to have solidarity with international workers.

Yer not wanting too much... you just feel what abolitionists feel when the Missouri Compromise was made

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ComradeLeonie@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago

Not quite sure why people here are that happy about it. If I understand this correctly then this isn’t even enough to cover current inflation, removes their right to strike for the next 6 years, has no hours-reduction, has no single payment to cover the past inflation. I don’t see how this is a win for workers. This seems like a huge win for the companies considering what else would have been possible.

[-] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

Well, yeah, but I'd be pretty happy if that happened in my industry.

[-] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No job is keeping up with inflation, even union jobs

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This seems like a huge win for the companies considering what else would have been possible.

To them it's a huge loss compared to what would've happened without the union - max 5% annual raises, if that.

has no single payment to cover the past inflation

That's like Netflix telling you "hey we didn't raise our prices enough to keep up with inflation, we'll now charge you for last 5 year's inflation in a single payment"

It won't fly because it wasn't in the original contract.

has no hours-reduction

Normally I'd agree with you that this sucks, but aren't they hourly? Hours reduction means pay reduction. If I was hourly, I'd want the ability to work more hours (AND obviously a higher hourly rate to begin with)

You're talking about this like this isn't a huge win for these workers, but that's just not true. Yeah there's been bad inflation, but minimum, mean and median wages have NOT increased nearly as fast as they should. Hell the minimum in the US has been unchanged for decades. And plenty of people still make minimum (or less in tipped jobs).

Now we just need more sectors to form unions, and strike successfully. In more countries than just the US. Here in EU we make less in tech than longshoremen do in the US whereas in the US, tech salaries are nearly uncapped. Unions could help. And obviously unions in the less well-paid industries are even more important.

[-] communism@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

To them it’s a huge loss compared to what would’ve happened without the union - max 5% annual raises, if that.

This is a ridiculous and liberal lesser-evilism. A pay rise below inflation is a pay cut. This is such an important point which trade unionists have been pushing since forever. We consistently see trade union leaders accepting pay cuts of this nature, against the will of rank and file unionised workers, when there is plenty of momentum for escalated strike action and an actual pay rise, with inflation, is entirely achievable. We absolutely need to be criticising the labour movement shooting itself in the foot.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] ComradeLeonie@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

That's like Netflix telling you "hey we didn't raise our prices enough to keep up with inflation, we'll now charge you for last 5 year's inflation in a single payment"

Who cares what these companies think is and isn't fair? They created this inflation for the past years, they pay for it. And besides that, why do workers need to adhere to a past contract in their current demands? Continuing the strike for a one-time inflation-payment would have been the right choice for the workers, so the union should have done so.

Normally I'd agree with you that this sucks, but aren't they hourly? Hours reduction means pay reduction. If I was hourly, I'd want the ability to work more hours (AND obviously a higher hourly rate to begin with)

Why does it need to be one or the other? That's what capitalists want you to think. Why can't it be an hour reduction and a pay increase together? That's something that would be great for everyone. Only increasing pay or only decreasing hours is always going to split workers based on their current economic standing. Doing both not only strengthens all the workers, it also positively affects their companionship.

Yeah there's been bad inflation, but minimum, mean and median wages have NOT increased nearly as fast as they should. Hell the minimum in the US has been unchanged for decades. And plenty of people still make minimum (or less in tipped jobs).

So because the minimum, mean and median wages have NOT increased nearly as fast as they should, we should… checks notes… not fight for better pay?

[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago

God damn 10% raises every year for 6 years? That's fucking sick.

[-] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago

It's 8% raise every year.

1.615^(1/6) ~ 1.083

[-] mactan@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago

ah falling short of inflation then

[-] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

There won't be 8% inflation yearly for the following 6 years unless another extreme geopolitical event unfolds

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

Chuckling off stage right. Sounds like Israel.

[-] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

There are decades where weeks happen, and there are weeks where decades happen. And the former means stagnation of purchase power and the latter means inflation lol

[-] Dessa@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

I think it's less likely a major geopolitical event DOESN'T happen

[-] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

We're at that moment of history aren't we?

[-] RaisedFistJoker@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

lol these guys shouldnt be celebrated, loyal dogs of the empire

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Tofu_Lewis@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

So I'm relying on more knowledgeable bears here, but this is basically a manifestation of unions without theory right?

Without state support unions will be assaulted by capitalistic mentalities and turn into gangs?

[-] macerated_baby_presidents@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

idk about state support. but yeah without bringing socialism in, there's nothing that makes unions directly fight for the working class as a whole, just for the interests of that segment of it. This strike could have had wider political implications, e.g. Maersk was one of the employers. The most extreme example is cop "unions" that actively fuck over the working class, but lots of unions sacrifice the rest of the class a little bit. For instance working people need public transit, Chicago's transit system has had a big operator shortage for several years, but the union made it really difficult to get a job as an operator (have to first do 1 year in an essentially unrelated menial role with few openings). Or you get Hoffa teamsters

[-] alexandra_kollontai@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

That's a really good point. Lots to think about.

[-] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Yerp, instruments for maintaining the system overall while giving concessions when the tension gets too high

so they've stopped the strike in exchange for a promise of a contract next year? and the promised contract is an 8% yearly raise? idk about this one

[-] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago
[-] Hestia@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

That was fast

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
198 points (100.0% liked)

news

24560 readers
558 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS