93
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] operacion_ogro@hexbear.net 52 points 1 week ago

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times - wow, really? Jaime, pull that up. It was the age of reason AND foolishness? Crazy.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago

"Bro... broooooooo, you know that when you, you know, light a candle... you are also literally casting a shadow?!"

"Holy shit. Mind equals blown."

improvement of literature intensifies

[-] Trudge@lemmygrad.ml 44 points 1 week ago

Consuming a tremendous amount of energy and water in running AI models to paraphrase a book when you can read the book in same amount of time or less is capitalist innovation

[-] FishLake@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 1 week ago

I truly don’t get it. Especially when audiobooks exist.

[-] dRLY@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

There are a lot of books that don't have (and likely not going to have) audiobook versions. So there is some use for getting better text to speech with the extra stuff an AI could add. And of course have accessibility options that don't have such robotic sounding with bad pronunciation.

That being said, shit is about profits first and the other stuff is not the focus. While I would love to listen to some books with the voice of the authors (or even could be neat to hear voices of podcasters I like read them). I would rather hear hear them read by people that either just really like it as a hobby or wanting to practice voice acting if the authors/podcasters aren't in control of their voice an AI is using. Which reminds me that I should check LibriVox for some non-official audiobooks that I want to read but am too busy to do so.

[-] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago

Requesting a Cumtown version that adds a laughing Greek man and Gay Michael Douglas to everything

[-] KurtVonnegut@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

geordi-no Greek Chorus

geordi-no Greek Cackling

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I really didn't miss anything of value by never listening to that, did I?

[-] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago

If you can't appreciate an hour-long bit wherein Eric Clapton repeatedly states a desire to shrink someone down and put them in his ass or become very large and have someone go into his ass and in either case control him with an array of wires and levers like some sort of giant robot then I don't know what to tell you

[-] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

If you have an appreciation for Beavis and Butt-Head, you kinda did.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

For me, a lot of the entertainment value of Beavis and Butt-Head was how other characters reacted to them as they wandered around being dumbasses.

I don't know if I'd enjoy Beavis and Butt-Head just sitting together and exchanging jabs nonstop.

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

It was 3 funny dudes kinda working on jokes and sometimes it didn't work and sometimes they'd land a huge hit and it was the dumbest funniest thing. It was kinda like being a fly on the wall in a comedy writing room and you get to hear all the bits and not just the stuff that made it to broadcast. A "warts and all" experience.

Like the idea of a stereotypical east coast Italian dude who has depression but he can't admit it because of machismo so tells his therapist he's "self-pissed." That bit had me dying of laughter when I was dealing with my own demons and was in denial about getting therapy. I was working outside in 113 degree heat and I was laughing so hard it made me light headed and I was like "lol please don't let me die of heatstroke because I passed out listening to this stupid fucking podcast."

There's some super cuts you can find on youtube that have the best bits. Probably the best way to experience it.

[-] Phish@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

It's got some truly hilarious bits and it's definitely become sort of a time capsule for the years it was going on, but there are also some bits that I have a very hard time with despite being generally hard to offend.

[-] Flyberius@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It is funny at times. Their takes aren't always terrible either. It is extremely offensive though.

Gay Michael Douglas at the bottom of the sea having sex with crabs will never not have me dying of laughter.

[-] BobDole@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

Stav Bot lives!

[-] Coca_Cola_but_Commie@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago

Excited for the future where everyone is totally illiterate.

[-] supafuzz@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

the future is already here, it just isn't equally distributed yet

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 1 week ago

No way! AI is now capable of text to speech?! Something we've had since the 80s? The future truly is here.

[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago
[-] KurtVonnegut@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

That's like saying "heh, you ate your veggies... like John Harvey Kellogg." smuglord

[-] BashfulBob@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago

I'm reminded of the TrashFuture episode intro where they had ChatGPT write dialogue based on ingesting fifty prior transcripts and coming up with a unique ten minute dialogue. Absolute fucking gibberish, but it did have a handful of riffs that you'd see pop up consistently between episodes.

Excited for all written works to be transformed in this novel and value-adding way.

[-] anarcho_blinkenist@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago

what does this even mean? There has been text to speech for web pages forever (I have to click a whole bunch of fire hydrants to find out)

[-] anarcho_blinkenist@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago

I found out basically it is nothing different from what has already existed in basic text to speech. This is basically just "entrepreneur" repackaging of the same thing that already exists to get people to buy a new thing and justify their investment lol

[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

More proof """"AI"""" is more of a marketing term than actual artificial intelligence. It's dot com/blockchain/cloud shit all over again.

[-] anarcho_blinkenist@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

no there are actual novel uses and even incredibly good uses of machine learning, This is just absolutely not one of them

[-] supafuzz@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

the "innovation" here is that the AI summarizes whatever corpus you feed it (often in a shallow or incorrect fashion) and then writes a bland NPR podcast script to tell you about it in bland NPR voices

[-] anarcho_blinkenist@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

that's so bad lmao. because that's literally what the writers of the thing already did to get you the information in the article/book whatever

It's gonna be really funny when people use this on AI written articles and then it gets AI summarized and you get telephone gamed by your own products

[-] ChicagoCommunist@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

If it's the one I've seen, it tries to parse the information then regurgitate it in a conversational podcast format. Seems like a useful tool for people who learn better that way, but I doubt it works very well above a high school level.

[-] anarcho_blinkenist@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yaeh bcause what I listen to a podcast the one thing always on my mind is "WOW these guys are really good at getting to the fucking point"

[-] take_five_seconds@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

bruh just get an audiobook

mf reinvented text-to-speech

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

But hear me out, what if text-to-speech, but it comes from a datacenter that dries up lakes and burns coal? so-true

[-] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 1 week ago

The day we have to offload tts computation to a datacenter will be a grim one

[-] Aradina@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago

Love that companies can control not just the sources of information but the way it's delivered.

[-] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I feel like text to voice has existed for a while. Matt Lech from MR mentioned he used to like turning books into audiobooks and playing nba 2k back in like 2019

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

Yeah but was it text to voice in the format of an obnoxious bunch of trust fund failson clowns rambling it back to you while trading edgy barbs? libbing-out

This is a tool called NotebookLM, an "AI first" notebook and study tool. This seems to be a tool for those technically literate enough to want AI in this, yet not competent enough to just string together Obsidian and Llama3.1. AI in notebooks is a marginal boost in productivity at best, and detrimental at worst. Deeply unserious product that is computationally inefficient qua computational inefficiency.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Just when you thought attention spans and social estrangement and socially-induced narcissism couldn't get any worse, Silicon Valley proudly introduces something to make the problem even worse! so-true Now a planet-burning treat printer will entertain you slop hogs with the only thing more sloppy than your regular slop: your own slop, recycled back to you with an obnoxious "influencer" format!

[-] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

They targeted the McElroy brothers. The McElroy brothers.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

So text to speech from like 20 years ago?

[-] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

It's so, so much worse than that. It injects Joss Whedon-esque banter.

[-] Parsani@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

It uses more electricity now

[-] MayoPete@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

OK, but hear me out... Capital Vol.1, mixed with poop jokes

[-] PointAndClique@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

Das Crapital

[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

Okay so I hadn't considered that it is possible for AI to completely and utterly ruin literally all white culture but now that I'm seeing that's a possibility I gotta say critical support to it

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It could ruin all culture it can reach colonial-style, in an Uno Reverse way that reinforces ruinous whiteness! so-true

What if the Mahabharata with Joe Rogan style commentary?! lmayo

[-] Homer_Simpson@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago
[-] HelltakerHomosexual@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

my mother showed me this and its actually fucking insane like i might be tempted to use it

[-] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

friend-visitor-1 "So you've got 20 yards of linen, right?"

"...Right." friend-visitor-2

friend-visitor-1 "And 20 yards of linen equals one coat, right?"

"...Uh huh." friend-visitor-2

friend-visitor-1 "But the coat has a use-value that satisfies a particular need, you know? But like, to produce the coat, you need a purposeful, productive--"

"Bro! [PLAYS SOUND BOARD SAMPLE OF A FART]" friend-visitor-4

friend-visitor-3 "Bro."

this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
93 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13480 readers
926 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS