50

And the wild part is I remember for a time G*mers screeching about wanting critics like Roger Ebert to take games seriously as an art. Now they got their wish, developers are treating their projects like art, and they don't like it because it dares to make them uncomfortable sometimes.

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HarryLime@hexbear.net 32 points 1 month ago

I saw some chud on twitter post triumphantly that the Sydney Sweeney deodorant commercial was a cultural victory and a return to the good old days of twenty years ago. The sum total of their imagination is a hot lady selling them soap. Utterly dismal existence.

[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago

I sometimes think it would be great to be that fucking stupid, no worries no thoughts head empty. But then i remember they're never happy either.

[-] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago

this is absolutely site tagline material.

[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

You think we can make a deal with chuds that in exchange for getting fully automated luxury gay space communism, we promise that ads will have naked anime women selling them shit?

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's also a preview of how mass media will look under the next stage of fascism. No themes, no complexity, no message, just guys bein dudes and women being props. No art, only toys.

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

Pretty scary. Total Stepford Wives-ied reality.

[-] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

The whole popularity around ai robot girlfriends fucking terrifies me.

[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

MFW Americans are such Disney adults they want to double down on all the things that made it slop in the first place.

[-] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago

Why are fascists so opposed to art having anything more than a surface-level meaning, anyway?

[-] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

because fascists view art as the maintenance of aesthetic. to a fascist, art must inherently pursue and preserve a standard of 'beauty'. it feels nonsensical, but fascism is an ideology fundamentally centered around mythos and culture. An 'uncouth' or 'ugly' culture is 'd/generate', whereas a 'moral' and 'pretty' culture is 'pure'. fascists view art as the battlefield, because fascist analysis places the aesthetic at the level of importance that we place material conditions.

[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

CHUDs constantly go on about “beauty” but fascists single-handedly turn country music into a punchline.

They’re not even good at living out their own values.

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If they had paid enough attention in school to understand art can do more than deliver booba images, they wouldn't be fascists.

Genuinely, though, it's because fascism as a mass movement is currently in its transitory stage where it hasn't found a solid economic foothold. The American petit bourgeoisie is not anxious enough to really cause fascism to crystallize into a solid movement with a complete platform. This is useful for fascists because being vague and abstract allows them to appeal to more people who are just alienated enough to reject liberalism. Keeping everything down to just aesthetics in this ridiculously childish way is all they can do, which ends up working against them as well. I expect that if they had a more organized movement, the aesthetics would remain just as shallow and they still wouldn't understand art, but they'd be at the book burning stage so we'd have bigger problems at our hands than which side has better art.

[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Art is communication, communication facilitates understanding, idk quite how to articulate from C to D but that sounds dangerous for the fascist project

Also rejecting deviation means clamping down on personal expression, leaving just the one acceptable surface aesthetic

[-] Owl@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

They're just being dishonest. They're okay with art that has a deeper meaning so long as the deeper meaning is also fascist.

[-] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because they're simple minded rubes

[-] peppersky@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

if we call videogame remakes and the shitty ass movies chuds watch art we've already given up art.

[-] Huldra@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

Whatever chuds are mad about with the SH2 Remake is definitely not caused by the project being treated like art, maybe besides the grander point but that game is a capital P product.

Really they should be happy they get a game designed from the outset to provide the player with x amount of gameplay for the price tag.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
50 points (98.1% liked)

games

20527 readers
128 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS