The scientific conclusion to be derived from this study is that the author has a potential passion for the game of Minecraft combined with a sense of humor to include subtle harmless references.

Further study is encouraged but logical expectations are that the authors neurological state may fall within the boundaries of autism spectrum disorder and that they have a high chance of being consider my friend, regardless of any non existing formal introductions between us.

No idea why we were studying this however.

Mimegraph

minceraft

I was wondering the same. The title and description say different things. Loss of fertile land is bad, but reduction of farmed area sounds like a good thing.

The infographic says crop farming. Ireland is green because of the grass which goes with animal farming.

The chart is lazy nonsense that ignores most of the farming in Ireland.

It doesn't mean anything, it only looks at crop farming area, that's it

The graphic mentions that a decrease in land area on the graphs might also imply increased density of farming, less commercial farming for economic reasons

No, it's not a bad thing.

Denmark being at 60% is horrible. It is land used by less than 0.1% of the population.

They don't even contribute to the GDP. Tthe entire business model relies heavily on EU susidies and couldn't exist without it. Always moaning about the weather, pricing and competition, fixing the papers to always show a net loss, yet still driving massive luxury cars because apparently Mercedes is the only brand that can drive on the paved roads between the fields.

However, politically, these thousand people who own or rent all the farm land have way too much power, because they have somehow managed to convince everyone living in the vicinity of this manure desert called agriculture that they somehow also benefit from the success of the business, even if they don't.

Fuck farming. It's a dirty industry.

It's not that they don't have flat ground in Norway, it's that most of it is vertical.

You try growing avocados in the mountains

So we have the Norwegians then Swedes and Finns, Russians(makes sense with the whole country being fucking tundra) and then Slovenia and Switzerland. And we are for some reason reducing the farmland here?? Insanity we already have ober 60% of the country being forest, basically no fucking suitable land for farming other places. We are not self sufficent with food and yet we reduce the amount of farmland.....

That's always been the way of it. Cities start where people settle, and people settle on the best land they can find. Then the city expands into the farmland surrounding it. This happened in Europe and Asia, and then NA. This isn't a Canada Bad thing.

Not really though, farmers keep too much land occupied and are bad for actual wildlife etc. Also it makes it impossible to build houses.

Damn, why then is Danish food basically just cream and pork.

Polders. :)