NSFW probably
content warning for the article and anything related sexual violence, sex abuse (sorry this wasn't here initially)
Unsurprisingly a little less than half were law enforcement related. The rest fit the bill for people we would guess are chuds. Just from the observed data I am 100% on her side.
"However, the judge refused to allow the records to be admitted in court as evidence, and denied Wuornos' request for a retrial." Well now.
the movie portrayal still haunts me 20 years later and everyone i watched it with hated it and turned out to be assholes later; that makes me wonder if the movie could serve as litmus test for people's empathy.
You should either take this down or give it every content warning. Holy shit that woman lived a horrifying life. I'd heard of the movie but never seen it, I had no idea.
Seriously, every CW: SV, CSA, SV against a sex worker, murder, just... shit.
You're right, I apologise, report stuff like this in future
I wasn't really thinking about it, it's a picture of a shirt I saw online and a shit joke about the american circus
You can edit the post title to add cws and stuff if you need to.
I added them to the body before the wikipedia article (which is far more unnecessarily brutal than I remember it being)
I can take it down and repost with a censored write up explaining who Aileen was, but are you suggesting I need to content warning a photo of her?
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank