57

DDHQ made the call after declaring Trump the projected winner of Pennsylvania and Alaska, which got him to exactly 270 electoral votes.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 81 points 2 weeks ago

I had so much hope for climate change and abortions rights and this burger man wins. Wtf is this state of world. The world will be on fire soon and the people can no longer do anything peaceful to stop it.

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

It is important to escape our self-built echo chambers. Many independent journalists and commentators spoke of an increase in minority support for Trump and Harris not reaching the Biden numbers.

We must focus on building up a grassroots movement that is for the working class and moving away from the duopoly.

Stay hopeful!

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Young people too. Being an asshole is starting to get popular again. And a running narrative has been that Trump's policies were good, people just don't like him because he's an asshole. And 18 year olds don't even remember the "grab them by the pussy" tape or anything he did that first year because they were 10.

[-] skeezix@lemmy.world -5 points 2 weeks ago

Wtf is this state of ~~world~~.

US. State of the US. We don't need latent american exceptionalism to add to the problem.

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 16 points 2 weeks ago

You are not wrong Russia invading Ukraine Isreal invading Palestine and kicking China playing games with Taiwan Everyone globally saying how but jobs like Trump are sprouting up. It hurts that I can't see one place to go or feel safe from the muricans.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

No, world. Where the US "leads" a lot of the rest of the world will follow, and the MAGAs are Hell-bent in leading us all off a +4°C cliff.

[-] MightyCuriosity@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 weeks ago

As a non US citizen I'm genuinely curious: how could people vote for this convicted, deranged, senile, racist, homophobic grandpa? Like what arguments do they use?

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Inflation.

But I think racism and homophobia as well as religion is another big reason. It just was articulated a lot less by people.

[-] MightyCuriosity@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

That means Trump will fix the inflation and Kamala wouldn't?

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 21 points 2 weeks ago

No it means because the inflation happened on the watch of the Democrats that the Democrats are getting blamed for it even though a lot of it was caused by how Trump handled COVID.

But US voters have a very short memory. And Trump is a very good liar.

Also I forgot to mention gender played a huge role in this. A lot of this is about misogyny and racism underneath the surface.

Unfortunately, the Democrats should have ran a white man. Because that's the state of this country really.

[-] SeikoAlpinist@slrpnk.net 19 points 2 weeks ago

The media normalized him. Just like they did to Hitler.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Inflation. "The economy" was the #1 polled issue among Republicans by far. We saw this as well with Bush and Trump's win in 2016 - for a lot of people, a scary amount, if you just promise "hey I'll make the economy better."

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

No evidence, but this smells fishy

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

You're the only other person I've seen mention this at all. I said it earlier, you, me, everyone, everyone's cousin, and also the FBI were very well aware that Trump & Co were definitely attempting to cheat the election, they've proven their intent to do so, and proper certification and electoral votes aren't even until mid December. I don't understand how this is possibly being uncontested right now. There are way less votes than everyone expected, it comes out in Trump's favor with exactly the thin margin he needed to win, and everyone is just running with "Yep he's won we know this 3 hours after election night there is no need to follow up further"

I, for one, don't believe a bit of this for at least the next month and expect some major findings in the next few weeks. I also might just be on the copium, who knows.

[-] chrischryse@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Can't Harris request a recount?

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
57 points (82.0% liked)

politics

19126 readers
1906 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS