144
submitted 10 hours ago by Brkdncr@lemmy.world to c/games@sh.itjust.works

They had no problems taking everyone’s money. Maybe companies should limit the number of sales when deploying a product tied to services they operate and need to scale.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 hour ago

Why does a flight simulator of all things need to be a live service game?

[-] HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee 8 points 52 minutes ago* (last edited 52 minutes ago)

Because it uses an extremely detailed 3d map of literally the entire planet, which can't (yet) be stored on a modern gaming pc offline.

[-] Baggie@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 hours ago

Bullshit, you own a cloud service and know how to scale a service to meet demand, you just fucked up.

[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

A new Flight Sim is out already? God dammit, I barely had time to play FS2020... Less than 10 hours.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

Sounds like a fake humblebrag.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 79 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

The peak concurrent users for the game thus far has been less than 1/10th of that (EDIT: slightly more than 1/10th of that). They were well within the bounds of what they simulated. They just screwed up.

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Where are you getting that number?

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 9 hours ago

Yeah from what I hear, they kept the shitty self-downloader of the first one that is obscenely slow and counts as "playtime" because the game is open while downloading.

This is on Microsoft, they can make as many excuses as they want, but they fucked it up.

[-] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It's ok tho they're making server complexes out of wood now!

/s

[-] einlander@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

Didn't account for the initial interest peak.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 23 points 9 hours ago

No, that's what I'm saying. That peak is well under what they claimed they simulated.

[-] Album@lemmy.ca -3 points 9 hours ago

Peak concurrent was marred by the game not being playable. It's not really a good indicator here.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 19 points 9 hours ago

It is, because everyone trying to download assets from the game servers were doing so from the executable that Steam tracks as running.

[-] Venator@lemmy.nz 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

You don't have to buy it from steam, might've been more users from gamepass and xbox than steam?

[-] taladar@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 hours ago

It is a flight simulator, somehow I doubt it has more console than PC users. Consoles are just too limited to satisfy that particular demographic. Can't even connect half a dozen different input devices to a console.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 43 minutes ago

In classic Microsoft style, "Xbox" doesn't necessarily mean the console. It's also the name of their gaming service and the store you can use to buy games on Windows.

[-] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 hours ago

Dunno what the sales for the new one are like, but the 2020 ms flight sim had a lot more mass appeal than any older flight sims, but maybe a lot of xbox players were put off by the pre download requirements?

Also when it's on game pass the barrier to entry is a lot lower, as a lot of people might install it with the intention of only playing it for like 5 minutes to see if they can see thier house or something, which they probably wouldn't pay full price on steam to do 😅

[-] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

But yeah it definitely sounds like thier test for 200k players probably had bigger instances provisioned than what they ended up using in the production release 😅

You'd think they'd be able to do some sort of auto scaling when demand goes up though... 😅

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

Perhaps, but 10x as many? I suppose it's possible, but I don't think it's likely.

[-] Album@lemmy.ca -4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

It's not, because downloading assets was not working, and with it not working eventually the user will shut it down thus having an effect on peak concurrent. It's not even that complex. If people can play your game they will stay on it increasing the count, if people cannot play your game they will not, thus decreasing the count.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

Exactly. The peak number of people trying to download it simultaneously was about 24k. They didn't all stick around because it wasn't working, even though that's about 1/10th of what the devs expected and prepared for the demand to be. They didn't get anywhere close to 200k people all hitting that server at once.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 hours ago

There’s no cloud, just someone else’s (underspecced) computer.

[-] darthsid@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago

The devs of MS are fairly incompetent - look at all the first party games they’ve released, including ones from purchased studios.

[-] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 2 points 21 minutes ago

The devs of MS are fairly incompetent

Or corporate executives push unrealistic expectations onto them

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 41 minutes ago

Al the Age of Empires games, apart from AoE1 DE, are excellent.

[-] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

With Microsoft it can sometimes be really hard to tell if it was the devs, management, or both tbh.

Does it really add that much more than the terrain we had 20 years ago?

[-] caboose2006@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

With mods you can get FSX looking pretty good

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 28 minutes ago

If it's the version I'm thinking of, that's circa 2007, yeah? I remember the fully 3D interior panels being a little crunchy looking but using it mostly to practice instrument stuff with the traditional 2D panel overlays at ERAU. For which it was perfectly adequate.

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

Woah woah woah buddy did you even take a second to think about the profits? Selfish.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 6 points 8 hours ago

I thought about the profits and now I totally get it. Why are so many people trying to hurt the innocent money???

[-] Randelung@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

No play, only buy! dog frisbee meme

this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
144 points (97.4% liked)

Games

16796 readers
556 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS