nah, i'm not really gonna get on board with "this institution is corrupt, so it should get much worse and we shouldn't have publicly supported higher education anymore."

Thats not what althusser advocated for at all wtf

For starters, it doesn't work very well to call right wingers out on not being right wing enough. Because they tend to just not care about ideological consistency or honesty, you're not really getting a hook into them with this. What you are doing instead is accepting the premises they've set, even if it's just as a hypothetical. You allow them to set the agenda and to frame the conversation. That's exactly what they want, and all you're getting out of it if you succeed in pointing out their "flaws" is that they aren't as Hitlerist as they could be, which is a W for them with anybody outside of the most hardcore nazi crowd that's so unhinged they do not even care about being strategically mask-on where it is opportunate, which is a fairly small subset of their base. All their less zealous supporters can go "look, he isn't as bad as you make him out to be, you lefties just call everyone you disagree with a nazi". On an argumentative level, you're entirely playing into their hands when you come after them like that.

This also means that you forego pushback against the policy you're debating because you are only discussing its execution, not that it exists in the first place. In the case of immigration and militarizing the border, we've observed a constant rightward shift over the last couple of decades. Being anti-immigration is now a bipartisan issue in the US (and a multi-partisan one in the EU). Thousands of deaths at the border are not something that worries "moderates" any longer, being seen as weak on securing the border is. I'm not blaming that on failed rhethoric strategies, but i do see these strategies as a reaction to a previous rightward shift on the issue amongst liberal parties. They know that imperialism and climate change will lead to increasing migration, they also know that this gets racists riled up and they know that under capitalism, they will never be able to end imperialist war or mitigate human impact on the climate. So their reaction is higher fences, more drones, more internment and deportation to keep refugees out.

Ford produces the hate crime that is the F150 Lightning, yes.

Tesla isn't an electric car company it's a tech bro finance company.

They're the highest valued car company in America and they make like 20 cars a month and recall half of them.

They haven't had a new car in years other than the cybertruck which has largely turned the company into a laughingstock to anybody not printing money from stock options.

Tesla will be either exempted, or this shit is going to hang over Musk as a sword of Damocles in case he's gonna misbehave

Someone else mentioned the electric F-150. GM has done a couple of electric cars on and off over the past decade or so - I've definitely seen a few Chevy Bolts and Chevy Volts around in my city.

I can't imagine any of them being particularly impressive

I think Trump will do whatever the MIC and other companies want him to do, unless it goes too much against his ego. That is one of the main reasons why I have some doubt he will end the Ukraine-Russo war. The Arms Industry is currently making a lot of money.

If you can't get yourself irradiated while playing computer games then can you even call yourself a free person?

People tell me "omg a Vance presidency would be so horrible!!" But they fail to consider that Trump OD'ing on party drugs before his inauguration would be so fucking funny it's unreal. The white washing news reporting, the Q theories, the solemn libs, a second Jan 6th.

Comrades it would be SO funny. I'd laugh until they gave me grippy socks.

trump has credibly shit his pants in public many times and as recently as like two weeks ago lol