521
submitted 1 month ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 132 points 1 month ago

As a Washingtonian, I’m so fucking sold.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 41 points 1 month ago

I think a lot of us in Washington and Oregon would be all for this. And we can leave the eastern sides out. Northern California is obviously welcome.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago

Northern California is obviously welcome.

Except for Silicon Valley, right? Or does Canada have better antitrust and worker's rights regulations and enforcement too?

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 12 points 1 month ago

The Bay Area can be excised to form the new US charter city-state of Galt’s Gulch.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago

Galt’s Gulch

Sounds like a sexually transmitted disease that you can also get from reading too much Ayn Rand 😂

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Workers rights are of provincial jurisdiction with some industries being under federal jurisdiction (like banks), so it would mostly be up to the new provinces.

Healthcare coverage is made mandatory by the federal side but is of provincial jurisdiction (so it's not handled the same everywhere).

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] don@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

Same fucking here!

[-] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 60 points 1 month ago

Vermont... I think we could get this done pretty quick... In fact, I bet the rest of the US wouldn't even notice... Bonus, we'll bring Bernie.

[-] Rusty@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 month ago

Vermont is already a honorary Canadian province for producing so much maple syrup.

[-] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 month ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

I'm so down for this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 60 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Minnesota welcomes Canada with the traditional poutine and tatortot hotdish border potluck

Please don't leave us behind

[-] HowAbt2morrow@futurology.today 8 points 1 month ago

Imagine the US losing the pacific coast?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sooo, as a Canadian, I'm pretty sure I have the authority to speak for all of us, and as much as I'd love to have you all, I'd rather not tempt fate and accidentally start a war.

Also, Indiana, Idaho, South Dakota and Wyoming, you're expressly not allowed in.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] BoobaAwooga@lemmynsfw.com 43 points 1 month ago

Honestly most northern states would probably want to join Canada. Michigan sign me tf up

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Oregonian here. I am ready to pledge allegiance to the king any minute

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago

It's funny how much more favorable the comments are on this compared donnie's original comments.

Canadians on joining the US: "oh hell no!"

Americans on joining Canada: "me too please!"

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

California should totally join Canada.

Having similar values, California will finally be able yonreally become what it wants under Canadian law. It being a ginormous economy is nice too for Canada and would just plain bankrupt the US in one go.

They can have Alberta in return if they want

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

entire west coast: let us in!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheDeepState@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

I think each individual state should be able to choose whether they stay in the US or not. Every ten years, the citizens of the state voted. If you vote to leave, you can’t come back for ten years. It would take place at the same time as the census.

[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Yes, the one aspect of the civil war that I have never agreed with was that a stare can not choose to leave the Union. If a terratory can vote to join the Union, I see no reason why they couldn't vote to leave it. On that note, I would also support the idea that the other states should have the right to vote out a state they no longer want in the Union.

[-] HomebrewHedonist@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

You’re right. Self determination is a right we all have.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

If the whole "annex Canada" stuff was just a distraction, this might become a reality, fascists like Trump are highly irrational, and might give them the 3 most western states, especially California.

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Am Californian, would seriously consider joining Canada.

Trump could reflexively say whatever (as he does) but so much cargo comes through here his business people wouldn't let him do it. Too much of a tariff risk.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

As an American, let me just say, 🎶 Oh Canada... 🎶

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Here's a nice compromise position - Canada becomes a republic; in exchange, the West Coast and the East Coast down to Maryland (or Virginia) join as unincorporated territories or whatever the Canuck equivalent is.

please save us from Y'All Qaeda

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Geobloke@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

This. This is how you fight trump

[-] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

As a Washingtonian, I would LOVE for this to happen. It’s a shame she’s joking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] michaelnik@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

I think it's all noise to distract from issues US should solve on its own.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 month ago

Speaking at a press conference last week in Ottawa, May called out the president-elect, saying, "Hey, Donald, have we got a deal for you? You think we want to be the 51st state huh? But maybe California would like to be the 11th province. How about it? California? Oregon? Washington?

I live in California and I'd like this. But then the USA would never have a non-GOP president ever again and that's against my conscience.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Pick me! Pick me! oh oh oh!

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, right. If California joined they’d be subsidizing health care for the rest of Canada through transfer payments since every province would be considered a “have not province” compared to California.

This is like inviting your billionaire uncle to move in with you and also open a joint bank account.

Edit: just to put some numbers on my point, the GSP (gross state product) of California is $4 trillion, nearly twice that of the GDP of Canada which is $2.18 trillion. Canada’s economy would effectively triple in size by bringing in California.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 32 points 1 month ago

She's trolling trump. It's not a serious proposition.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

One can still fantasize about a brighter future, can they?

[-] don@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

Yes, by all means. Considering how dismal it’s about to be in the states, the only ones that would revile you for imaging a brighter future are mostly those who voted to make it darker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Isn't this kinda already the case when you compare California to other states? In terms of subsidizing the rest of the country, not healthcare.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Canada has a massive program of equalization transfer payments where taxes collected in rich provinces go to subsidize poor ones. The US does not have anything like this. None of the state governments have their budgets subsidized by other states.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's federal taxes so it's the federal government that's subsidizing some provinces and not others to make their potential tax revenue per capita the same, the goal is to make sure those provinces aren't left behind.

If the program didn't exist Albertans would still pay those taxes, they would be used to pay for other Canada wide programs.

Bonus: Lil'PP signed on the the current calculation of transfer payments, it was put in place during the Harper years.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Yes subsidized healthcare is the goal.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Steve@communick.news 9 points 1 month ago

What about New Mexico?
If the US can have Alaska, we can join Canada, right?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 7 points 1 month ago

Those aren't the states I picture as being closely connected to Canada, but maybe that's because I'm jealous

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Maryland. I'm in. It's closer than you think.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Yes. One million times yes. Let's watch the GOP fucking implode when the largest GDP State (CA) leaves their ass. It's insane they are whining about our fires... Idaho was far more on fire this year than us in California. And that was all forest, not literal neighborhoods that 100% raked their fuckin leaves.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
521 points (98.0% liked)

News

25243 readers
1648 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS