454
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by zaxvenz@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world

Sen. Ted Cruz has begged President Donald Trump to stop listening to the tariff hawks in his administration and “take the deal” countries are offering to lower trade barriers.

https://archive.ph/RBX67

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 222 points 2 months ago

Isn't this dude a Senator? He can help end the stupid tariff war any time he wants. If he can grow a spine and bring 4 friends with him he can at least put pressure on his pals on the house of representatives.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 173 points 2 months ago

Ted Cruz famously has no friends.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 2 months ago

Infamously, he's the Zodiac killer

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

His dad killed JFK. It's a whole family thing for the man who refuses to call people by the name they've chosen.

[-] errer@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago

“If you killed Ted Cruz on the floor of the Senate, and the trial was in the Senate, nobody would convict you.”

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 70 points 2 months ago

Isn’t this dude a Senator?

“If you killed Ted Cruz on the floor of the Senate, and the trial was in the Senate, nobody would convict you"

~ Lindsey Graham

Might also be worth noting that his wife is a managing director at Goldman Sachs. I have to imagine she's spent the last week in meltdown mode.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 27 points 2 months ago

“I probably like Ted Cruz more than most of my colleagues like Ted Cruz, and I hate Ted Cruz."

-Al Franken

https://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/31/politics/al-franken-ted-cruz/index.html

[-] Sibshops@lemm.ee 48 points 2 months ago

Yeah 2/3 of congress can end the whole trade war. This is just showmanship.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 2 months ago

You don't even need that much. At least at this stage, Trump is abusing existing laws as a sledgehammer against the economy. While Trump can veto new laws passed by "just" 50% of the Congress, they would at least have some leverage to pressure him.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

But he won’t. Because he’s a morally defunct crumpet.

[-] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

How dare you impune crumpets by comparison.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 13 points 2 months ago

Oh, fuck, we have invoked the wrath of Lemmy's infamous crumpet stans.

[-] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

You crumped around. Now it's time to find out.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

In my defense, I really love watching these dumbasses trying to figure out what the heck a crumpet is, and then getting angry because they don't know and just assume it's something awful.

[-] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I can pretend, if that helps move things along:

"IT'S THE EXACT SAME THING AS AN ENGLISH MUFFIN!"

The trap is baited. Now, we wait.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Bruh...

If we're waiting for Raphael Cruz to grow a spine we'll never stop waiting.

There's a reason the title includes "begs" and I'm honestly surprised he's doing that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

It is so he can look like he was putting up a fight.

[-] scytale@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago

Yeah, he's probably seeing that his constituent supporters are starting to feel the negative effects. He's just putting on a show.

[-] booly@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

The Senate has already passed a bill that limits the President's power to set tariff rates on Canada. The House probably won't take that up.

Right now, there's also a Senate Bill with 7 GOP senators signed on that would limit the President's power to unilaterally set tariffs (requires 48 hours notice to Congress, can't last more than 60 days without Congressional approval, gives Congress fast track procedures for voting down new tariffs). There are some serious constitutional flaws in it (most notably the legislative non-aggrandizement doctrine, but also an issue with tying to sidestep the bicameralism and presentment requirement), though, and I'm not sure it would hit the point where it could overcome a presidential veto.

So right now it's not clear whether this GOP opposition would actually build into real legislation that could actually have an effect, or whether this is all showmanship trying to influence Trump himself to roll this back.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 73 points 2 months ago

Trump's aides love tariffs because Trump loves tariffs. He's been obsessed with them his entire life.

Rafael isn't criticizing Trump, he's giving him an escape hatch, trying to pretend that this is all "bad advice".

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

NPR played a clip from 1987 of him calling into some radio show to bitch about trade imbalances.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Exactly. He's been holding onto this notion for decades, and no one has ever disabused him of it. Now he's a mentally declining old idiot and it's too late to teach him that he's wrong.

This is why Bessent is trying to bail. He's never been a fan of this "tariff everyone" approach, and it's now finally occurred to him that he's going to get the blame to cover Trump's ass.

[-] P1k1e@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Can't tell narcissists they're wrong, they just lash out. If he believes he's right he'll make 8000 excuses as to why his plan failed. IV seen it before in the family my aunt married into. Even when wrong they were never wrong, until a "higher ranking" narcissists in the family bullied them into submission. Sadly, no higher ranking narcissist than the president

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago

From the US Constitution:

"Article I, Section 10, Clause 2:

No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it’s inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress." source

I won't call you Ted, because I know how much you hate people forcing preferred names. Rafael Cruz, you have the power granted to you by the US Constitution to stop the trump tariffs. You don't need to ask trump. The power is yours. Use it!

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

How Congress delegates its tariff powers to the president

According to the Congressional Research Service, there are six statutory provisions currently in place that control how the president and the executive branch can use tariffs. Three provisions require federal agency investigations before a tariff can be imposed. The other provisions do not require an investigation before actions are taken.

...

Among the three provisions that allow the president to act on his own to impose tariffs without an investigation, only one has ever been used: the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977. The act allows the president to declare an emergency under the National Emergency Act (NEA) and then use his extensive economic powers to regulate or prohibit imports. The CRS says that President Trump was the first chief executive to use this act in February 2025, when he announced tariffs on Canada, China, and Mexico. The emergency stated by the president can be terminated at this request, or by a joint resolution of Congress.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Those Acts are laws written by Congress. Congress also has the power to write new laws amending or removing the previous ones. Again, its still in Rafael's (and his coworkers) hands to stop trump's tariffs.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago

It's really amazing how the GOP members of Congress have willingly given up their power.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 16 points 2 months ago

It’s really amazing how the GOP members of Congress have willingly given up their power.

I have to chime in on this one. The President didn't just suddenly get all this authority; both mainstream parties started handing it over willingly decades ago.

The Executive Branch of our Government, led by the President, is in control of far too many things.

[-] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 4 points 2 months ago

That's fair, but the are handing him these wins. All of his picks have been smooth sailing and if they had a spine they could impeach him right now. It's not that there are no ways to stop this, it's that he's "too big to fail" and the Rs let it get this way.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

The abdication is real.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 months ago

I can’t hear him. I stopped listening to Ted Cruz.

[-] ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

Why is rafael still using a preferred name?

[-] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 9 points 2 months ago

I think I'll call her Rachel from now on

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

My God, I FORGOT that!

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

I bet Trump doesn't listen to Rafael because he doesn't go by his birth name....

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

and he’s an immigrant

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 17 points 2 months ago

Well he is in luck. My senator is introducing a bill to limit his ability to impose tariffs:

https://www.npr.org/2025/04/09/nx-s1-5354912/trump-tariffs-senate-bill-bipartisan

[-] Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago

Leopards everywhere today! What the hell is going on?!

[-] Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago

Must be nice being in a position where when things go right (does that actually ever even happen with these fucking people?), you take all of the credit. But when things go wrong, it's because of your aides and advisors.

[-] harmsy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Runaway Ted's mistake is thinking Trump wants peace. Trump doesn't want peace. HE WANTS PROBLEMS! ALWAYS!

[-] El_Scapacabra@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Mo Donnie Mo Problems

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

I bet his tariff-loving aides have shorted a bunch of stocks and are making hand over first right now.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

It's not done going down yet.

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

What deals? Trump's tariff against the US numbers are made up, they are US trade deficits. Are other countries supposed to lower this number somehow? Is he forcing them to stop exporting to the US? Well that's going to have the same effect as tariffs, right? Or is he going to force them to buy more US products? First of all, that's straight up Mafia behavior; but also the US just doesn't manufacture that much to begin with.

How is this going to make any sense.

[-] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Is there a video?

[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You wanted him, you got him. Now live with the consequences like big boys.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
454 points (98.9% liked)

News

29987 readers
2399 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS