Yeah, because if he comes back, he's going to be put on a media circuit where he's going to say what he saw there, which is a fucking concentration camp.

Anybody see the "Homegrowns next" comment during this meeting? That's us isn't it? We're the homegrowns I'm pretty sure.

So we’re officially there then. It’s fully out in the open now, even more so than before. Be very careful what you say online folks, join an org yesterday, we are in 1939 mode.

So the poor man is either dead because it's a fucking death camp or maybe still alive but will not be returned because of the stories he'd be able to tell, Jesus Christ...

idk what to even say to this, and here I thought the bush jr. years were bad with slapping the "terrorist" label on anything that moves. Please, please, please be careful with whatever you say online anymore because this shit could very easily escalate to black-bagging anyone for saying anything.

Wonderful thing about "rules based order" people... whoever is in charge gets to make the rules and the "rules based order" people can then go, "Well... see... the courts say its so, the police/miltary say its so, the executive branch says its so", and then poof there is now no conflict that needs to be resolved with the "rules based order" people. They can go along with something that just last week they were upset about because "well, these are the rules that we live with".

Yeah, absolutely cooked. I’m looking at it in the context it’s being represented in the mainstream.

Garcia did come here illegally years ago BUT he’s been here for so long blah blah blah blah

OK great. The minute you included that first part, you lost. Godamn, these resisters really fucking suck at resisting.

Almost like bourgeois law doesn’t apply to the bourgeois and it’s almost like we’re all living under a collective delusion that it does

I was reading the blog posts of some of my favourite liberals in response to this, and the whole thing is just "The US is turning fascist and there's nothing anyone can do and no one to coming to save us." Just pure brunch energy. So sad, so powerless.

Waiting on the Parlimentarian to save us...any second now.

Unless the National Parks Service Rangers or Postal Inspectors are willing to be the enforcement arm of the court's contempt charges, I'm not sure court rulings even matter any more.

steven miller just outright inverting the truth here as well, claiming that the 9-0 supreme court decision was actually in their favor

And they're making jokes about it.

“John ~~Marshall~~ Roberts has made his decision, now let him enforce it.”

If you were serious about checks and balances the judiciary would have a standing army. Failing that now's the time to remember you can deputize basically anybody into USMS service. Get cracking

The supreme court never demanded that the US government returns Abergo Garcia. The supreme court says that the US government just needs to "facilitate" his return. The demand from the district court that the US government "effectuate" his return from a previous district court ruling was considered unclear and exceeding the district court's authority. So in essence all the supreme court asked was for the US to make his possible return to the United States easier (facilitate), and not forcing the US government to return Garcia to the United States (effectuate). Liberals, who are wishing for some idealistic showdown between the supreme court and the US government out of a Harry Potter novel and wish casting a constitutional crisis, misread and misunderstood the demands of the supreme court order.

The rest of the District Court’s order remains in effect but requires clarification on remand. The order properly requires the Government to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador. The intended scope of the term “effectuate” in the District Court’s order is, however, unclear, and may exceed the District Court’s authority. The District Court should clarify its directive, with due regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs. For its part, the Government should be prepared to share what it can concerning the steps it has taken and the prospect of further steps.

Is it officially considered a "Constitutional crisis" yet? This kind of logic only works on toddlers, when you want to make an excuse about something and you know they lack the mental maturity to dispute it. Normal, rational adults all understand what this means.

So, when are the adults in the room going to step up and say something about it? Or are we all just going to pretend we're toddlers, and don't understand what this means?

Ah well nevertheless