70
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 4 days ago

Just to put this into perspective. Gothard base tunnel in Switzerland was 35 miles long and cost 13 billion dollars. To go coast to coast with those costs would be trillions. And that tunnel wasnt built to be hardened against nuclear attacks, or bunker busters either. If you go deeper it gets more expensive. You need climate control systems to control geothermal heat. You need pumps to keep it from flooding. You need ventilation systems ever so often to bring in air from the surface. You need emergency exits so if part of it collapses people arent trapped inside.

When making them that long you have to dodge volcanoes, aquifers, natural cave systems, mines, seismic activity hotspots etc. Making dozens to hundreds of mile long detours for each. It would take decades just to dig them, and where would you put all the rock, and soil you take out? Your basically digging up multiple entire mountains worth it has to go somewhere.

I mean seriously the USA can't even build a single HSR line on the surface do we think they'd somehow build an entire underground network of rail when its 100x harder and more expensive?

[-] 666@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

To go coast to coast with those costs would be trillions. And that tunnel wasnt built to be hardened against nuclear attacks, or bunker busters either. If you go deeper it gets more expensive. You need climate control systems to control geothermal heat. You need pumps to keep it from flooding. You need ventilation systems ever so often to bring in air from the surface. You need emergency exits so if part of it collapses people arent trapped inside.

From what I was told, there was all of that. I have zero doubt the U.S can build the infrastructure it needs. You can see the demonstrations of these in Florida or when the U.S Civil Engineers actually decides to do something with a public project; and that's something more commercial/environmental with less manpower and funding.

Will it do it for civilians? Absolutely not. Only for essential/top-demand things in the military. All of the other stuff is handled by private citizens/contractors.

The United States has consistently failed billion+ dollar audits for it's already incredibly labyrinthine defense industry. While I don't doubt that it is mostly grift and corruption, I also don't doubt that the U.S is consistently funneling dark money into horrors and projects like these.

I can absolutely believe for a moment that when it comes to military infrastructure deemed essential and important to the military, it can be built. New technology, R&D however? No. The matter of moving mountains and everything you described can be done with todays technology. I don't believe they're hauling grey aliens across the country in tunnels reaching the mantle/core of the earth in Hyperborea.

I would believe that there are unloading stations with surface-level connections across the country. Not all of it is "Deep underground". There are railroads to military sites and those aren't commonly accessible to the average person. Other people in the military have said similar things about underground access points. It's all anecdotal, of course.

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
70 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13956 readers
758 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS