70
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
70 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13959 readers
676 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
From what I was told, there was all of that. I have zero doubt the U.S can build the infrastructure it needs. You can see the demonstrations of these in Florida or when the U.S Civil Engineers actually decides to do something with a public project; and that's something more commercial/environmental with less manpower and funding.
Will it do it for civilians? Absolutely not. Only for essential/top-demand things in the military. All of the other stuff is handled by private citizens/contractors.
The United States has consistently failed billion+ dollar audits for it's already incredibly labyrinthine defense industry. While I don't doubt that it is mostly grift and corruption, I also don't doubt that the U.S is consistently funneling dark money into horrors and projects like these.
I can absolutely believe for a moment that when it comes to military infrastructure deemed essential and important to the military, it can be built. New technology, R&D however? No. The matter of moving mountains and everything you described can be done with todays technology. I don't believe they're hauling grey aliens across the country in tunnels reaching the mantle/core of the earth in Hyperborea.
I would believe that there are unloading stations with surface-level connections across the country. Not all of it is "Deep underground". There are railroads to military sites and those aren't commonly accessible to the average person. Other people in the military have said similar things about underground access points. It's all anecdotal, of course.