89
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

If you drive normally I’ll let you pass. But if you’re up in my ass flashing highbeams when I’m still overtaking? Grab a snack buddy cause we’re going nowhere and we’re not going there fast either.

[-] Monument@piefed.world 1 points 1 week ago

What I’m hearing is you require other drivers to drive deferentially in such a way that caters to your ego in order for you to drive safely and avoid conflicts, otherwise you drive like a sociopath for sport?

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago
[-] Monument@piefed.world 0 points 1 week ago

I must have.

My wife is an anxious passenger. I usually set the adaptive cruise control to whatever matches prevailing traffic, and stay in the outermost lane unless I have to pass someone. Most of my driving is honestly trying to make sure if someone does something stupid, I’m reacting to it in a calm way.

A lot of people have big feels about controlling the road.
The adaptive cruise control is interesting - if I’m a few hundred feet behind someone long enough for it to “lock in”, I know their speed because my car is pacing them.

It’s fascinating to see people suddenly accelerate after miles of the same speed on a relatively empty road because I moved into the passing lane, or (conversely) slow down because they’re alongside a slow vehicle and not in danger of being under-passed by another driver. The ego and herd mentality is something to behold.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It’s fascinating to see people suddenly accelerate after miles of the same speed on a relatively empty road because I moved into the passing lane, or (conversely) slow down because they’re alongside a slow vehicle and not in danger of being under-passed by another driver.

This is why if I'm on a road with one lane in each direction, when I pass, I PASS. Nothing is more terrifying than when someone takes their sweet time passing, barely going faster than the car in the lane next to them. Plus then you have to deal with the people like you're describing. They don't want to go as fast as you, but they do want to prevent you from passing them.

What I've found is that this type of passive aggressive driver is also a coward. Let's say they're going 60 and I want to go 65. I come up behind them to pass. If I try to pass at 65, there's a good chance they'll increase their speed to 65 in order to prevent me from passing them.

I don't give them the opportunity. As far as I'm concerned, when you're passing in a lane of opposing traffic, speed limits don't exist. If I'm risking a head-on collision, I want to get in and out of that lane as fast as possible. So instead of going 65 while passing, I'll rocket up to 85 and rapidly pass them. The passive aggressive assholes are cowards and won't speed up that much to prevent you from passing. So I rocket up to 85, get the passing over with before they can do anything about it, and then slow down to the speed I actually want to travel at. By that point, the slowpoke is well in the rear view mirror. They don't tend to speed back up either. By then their monkey brain just sees you as another car on the road, far away from them, not a challenge to their ego.

[-] Monument@piefed.world 1 points 1 week ago

The people in my neck of the woods will range from 65 to 85 sometimes! It’s why I’ve adopted a more passive approach - because people are randomly hyper aggressive.

[-] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Jesus fucking christ calm down you lunatic

[-] Monument@piefed.world 1 points 1 week ago

Oh, sorry. Comment snuck up on you too fast? Put you ill at ease while you thought you were the only person on the internet?
What are you gonna do, claim personal offense and use that as justification to return the offense ten-fold?

There is another option. It’s minding your business.
We can’t know the justifications or dispositions of others, but we can choose not to pick fights with strangers. In fact: choosing to avoid confrontation could save a life! Someone else’s, or even your own - you don’t know who you’re messing with on the road. 🌈💫

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 week ago

If you're that car in the first place, you're blocking traffic. Get the fuck out of the way.

[-] StillAlive@piefed.world -1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, play chicken with a maniac driving a 2 ton vehicle. Good luck.

[-] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Driving at the speed limit is not ‘playing chicken’

[-] StillAlive@piefed.world 1 points 1 week ago

'Legally right' means dick to these people.

Let them pass lest they do something reckless and take you with them in the process.

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This sign is legally binding.

[-] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Sadly, only in some states is it legally binding.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Though I read a story (I think on lemmy, though it's been a while) of someone trying to meet an ambulance in the middle of nowhere (Texas, I want to say?) as their friend was bleeding out, basically.

A lady did what you describe and it took critical time away. The friend ended up dying just before they met the emts.

Not everyone who looks like they are a dick, are one.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Anecdotes aren't data.

Ride my ass so closely that you put me in danger, and I'm taking my time.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago
[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Okay but they're not. Right? Data points by themselves aren't data. That's why they have a different name.

If you look at one data point, then everyone with red hair is a billionaire because I saw one once.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 week ago

Data

data

different name.

?

[-] prettybunnys@piefed.social -1 points 1 week ago

“Instead of letting the dangerous driver past me and away from me I am making the situation worse by attempting to intervene”

[-] architect@thelemmy.club -2 points 1 week ago

Just move the fuck over and don’t subject everyone to this bs. My husband does this and twice now these psychos acted erratically and followed us home. How the fuck is it worth it? Move over let them pass and get pulled over if it’s that bad.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

What I'm hearing is "don't dress like that if you don't want to get assaulted". Is that right?

I'm going to move over. But if you're up my ass then I need to have much farther stopping distance from the car in front of me, to account for the decrease in response time from the follower. Which means I can't pass as quickly or get over as fast.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

There's "don't dress like you want to be assaulted" and then there's "don't look up your local sex offender registry, find the most violent rapist you can, drink a handle of vodka and eat three edibles, break into their house when they're away, and tie yourself nude to their bed."

I absolutely don't blame rape victims for their rape, at least in any sane scenario. But if someone did the latter, yeah, I'm sorry, I'm going to say they asked for it. If someone literally goes out of their way to deliberately get raped, well then at that point it's consensual sex, not rape.

[-] socsa@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago

Shit happens and sometimes you won't be there for it and that's just life. It's not a justification to put everyone else on the road in danger.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Easy to say when it's not you bleeding out, but alright fam

[-] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

Thats what emergency flashers are for.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Emergency flashers... on your typical like Nissan Altima (or whatever)?

The two vehicles were headed to a central meeting point to save critical time, in the actual middle of nowhere.

[-] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago

Yes, it's the red triangle button, give it a shot sometime!

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That's not an 'emergency flasher' button, it's the hazards, and it's for when you're broken down or crashed, or (illegally) stack your home depot run 17 pallets high.

I'm a first responder (at least, used to be) and that button is known in the states as the 'park wherever you want' button and nothing else.

Fun fact, using the hazard indicators while moving on a public road can be a cited offense. But you have fun going wee-woo and playing pretend emergency man. Maybe lose the snappy attitude though, it's indicative of your age and knowledge.

[-] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

https://legaloverview.com/is-it-illegal-to-drive-with-hazards-on/

Here's a article about the differences, goes into detail about Texas

Texas law enforcement generally takes a common-sense approach to hazard enforcement. Officers focus on genuinely dangerous driving, not technical violations of hazard rules... Texas gives drivers wide latitude on hazard use, but using them without any valid safety reason can still draw attention.

I am fairly certain a person bleeding to death would be a common-sense usage due to driving well above the speed limit to get help.

My comment was snarky because, as you said, people in the states don't use them for anything but parking illegally and many don't know what it's for. I have had to explain what it's for to people decades older. Again from the article:

State laws use various terms including “hazard warning lights,” “emergency flashers,” “four-way flashers,” and simply “flashers.”

I was raised on Emergency Flashers, you obviously weren't, and thats fine, but don't try talking me down because you think you're right without checking first. Lots of people coming in here with an unlinked story that, tbh, sounds extremely far fetched to justify someone not switching lanes as fast as the person most certainly speeding wants gets on my nerves real quick.

[-] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

If you do what the comment describes it's fine. But if you do it to an ambulance you deserve to be shot as I do think we can all agree there is a distinct difference between any regular car and an ambulance.

[-] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 0 points 1 week ago

I think the story goes that the ambulance was driving towards a car containing the patient, and the car containing the patient was also driving towards the ambulance.

[-] Akasazh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It's tragic but that is an infrastructure failure more than anything else.

I'm my tiny country we have trauma helicopters for stuff like that. You should never get into your own car with stuff like that.

Secondly how did it is to have a alarm line operator tell you to get into your own car to meet the ambulance half way. How did that work?

[-] architect@thelemmy.club -2 points 1 week ago

In rural areas they Will communicate with both of you.

Once again, move the fuck over. You aren’t the police.

[-] Akasazh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Way to miss my point. Have better ambulance coverage.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 week ago

Two things can be true: the ambulance coverage should be better and you aren't the traffic police, you don't know their situation, move the fuck over.

Guess which one you have more control over.

[-] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Guess which fast driving car situation is more likely?

That's right. Assholes.

[-] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Cute story. Still not correct to drive like a psycho unless your vehicle has sanctioned emergency lights that are active.

[-] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago

Then it's an educational failure because they didn't use emergency lights.

[-] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You don't know that they didn't use emergency lights, and it ultimately doesn't matter either way. Someone died a preventable death because of people like you trying to police others' behaviour.

Edit: made my comment a little less mean

[-] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

No one here remembers them saying this in the post it seems, and no that death didn't happen because someone wouldn't get over. I'm not policing anyones actions here any more than saying "there is a standard procedure for this that could've also impacted the death." Fwiw that person in the example pic here doesn't have enough clearance to switch lanes at 70+ mph safely, which would be 6+ cat lengths and would be risking lives moving over.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

The examine pic needs to fit on their back tailgate.

[-] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago

No, they don't really need it at all

this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
89 points (95.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40319 readers
1723 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS