422
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hope@lemmy.world 63 points 2 months ago
[-] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 52 points 2 months ago

Its possible in 3 spacial dimensions, which last time I checked is the number of dimensions we exist in.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago
[-] anothercatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

Could rotate it so it looks square ish

[-] Michal@programming.dev 9 points 2 months ago

In theory yes, but in practice those 4 people would be standing on a plane (i.e. Ground).

[-] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

You never hang with the homies in the ISS?

[-] vonxylofon@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Yep, it's a regular triangular pyramid.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago

That wouldn't project onto a 2D surface as a square though.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

An isometric projection of a regular tetrahedron could absolutely be a square.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 2 months ago

Grrr...yes. You're right. Isometrically.

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago

Neil deGrasse Tyson has no business next to the other 2.

[-] Carvex@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

But he's Black Science Man! How else would I know the sun is hot without him learning me?

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

In fairness, he actually knows a lot about astrophysics. The problem is that he likes to pontificate on all things science as if he’s degreed in every field.

[-] TheFogan@programming.dev 13 points 2 months ago

does he really do much pontificating? I've generally just seen him as someone that communicates upper high school, lower college level concepts in ways that are fairly understandable for those with little science background.

I mean yeah he comes off as a smug asshole in the process, but to my knowledge I've never seen him really pontificating on say the bleeding edge of what fields he's not in can do. Though maybe that's just something I've missed seeing him do.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I’ve seen both. Making science accessible is always a good thing. He also has moments where he’ll aggressively debate someone over the Amazon river basin or ancient civilizations when it’s apparent he’s out of his element.

[-] BCsven@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

I listen to his podcast. He often talks over guests and interrupts them to make sure everyone knows he knew something. Overall his show good, and the guest are amazing, but his ego ruins the feel of the interview a lot.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

He's sooooo insecure and it comes out in so many unpleasant ways.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I have to admit I find his opinion on every single common thing like it's some profound thought really jarring

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 2 months ago

Pythagoras wasn't the first to describe the relationship and he didn't prove it mathematically, but he still got his name attached to it for centuries.

That's life goal stuff right there.

[-] TheFogan@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago

Kind of like Lou Gehrig... lucky SOB did nothing, yet will be forever immortalized.

[-] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

As he said, he was the luckiest man ~~alive~~ on the face of the Earth.

[-] teft@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

Maybe they’re standing on a sphere.

[-] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

flat-earthers hate this one proof.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 2 months ago

hyperbolic-earthers you mean :D

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

That would make it even less possible

[-] teft@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

How do you figure? Make a tetrahedron of the points. Form a sphere around the points. Everyone is equidistant.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ah, I was thinking of curved space over the surface of the sphere. Right you are. No need for me to start getting non-Euclidean

[-] Forester@pawb.social 22 points 2 months ago

It's a minimum separation guideline not a a description of a geometry.

[-] Sphks@jlai.lu 6 points 2 months ago

Ooooh that's why people were angry. I didn't have to follow them anytime from 1.5m ?

[-] Forester@pawb.social 1 points 2 months ago

I don't know why, but my Lemmy client is insisting that I haven't read your reply yet even though I've marked it red five times. So now I'm responding

[-] Speiser0@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago

No, stop spreading misinformation! Because of you people will not be in the right positions and get covid. Downvoted.

calm down man, there is an invisible and pretty large mole hill in the middle.

[-] flora_explora@beehaw.org 10 points 2 months ago

That makes it even worse

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 9 points 2 months ago

Hyperbolic-earthers approve.

[-] not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Mmmm, pringles!

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I wonder how universal it is that my brain can't read "calm down, calm down" without it being in a Scouse accent

[-] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 4 points 2 months ago

Dunno about universal, but UK-wide certainly

[-] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago

Is your brain wearing a shell suit as it does that?

[-] JoShmoe@ani.social 6 points 2 months ago

I also don’t see a problem. I have however found an error.

print out the meme and highlight it using highlighter

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago

I love science memes, but this is just silly. It's so obviously "at least" 1.5 meters. If you're in this exact formation, you are 1.5m from 2 people... and about 2.12m from the other one.

[-] iii@mander.xyz 4 points 2 months ago

Then why not write >= 1.5m? Check mate atheist

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Because it's implied...? The graphic is based on health experts' advice that people stay at least 1.5 meters apart, not that they stay exactly 1.5 meters apart with weird synchronized movements.

Sorry, I'm doubling-down on my argument! But the real reason is probably because not everyone knows what > and < mean...

this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
422 points (95.3% liked)

Science Memes

15830 readers
2192 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS