308
optimal amount of syrup (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Etterra@discuss.online 3 points 2 hours ago

I keep telling people that you can make nice, even months if you just have 13 of them but nooooo, 13 is a prime number, you can't divide it by 2, 3, 4, or 6! Boo fucking hoo, I want every month in the year to start on the same day of the week.

[-] enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 hours ago

TIL the shape in waffle is to hold syrup.

[-] stan_stanminson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 8 hours ago

Why we don't make one giant square to hold even more syrup?

[-] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 13 points 5 hours ago

Because then it gets too soggy in the middle. The magic of the waffle is that the tops of the square dividers stay mostly dry until you start cutting into them. So you get freshly syruped waffle throughout the eating process.

[-] yuriRO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 7 hours ago
[-] robyn@lemmy.org 8 points 8 hours ago

The evil waffle

[-] gressen@lemmy.zip 54 points 9 hours ago

Except the 17 square version holds less syrup than the 16 square version because you need to reduce the size of the squares to fit more of them.

[-] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 27 points 8 hours ago

For those who didn't know you can just pour as much syrup as you like, regardless of the square count.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 35 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

If you take the original 16 squares and reduce them each in half, you can have 32 squares. Doctorate now, please.

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 28 points 8 hours ago

If the squares are half the size, you get 4x the number of squares, assuming you're measuring side length and not area.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 23 points 8 hours ago

Oh hey sorry I didn't know you went to school for this shit. Fine. you make the waffles.

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 13 points 8 hours ago

I should put "Bachelor's in Waffleology" on my resume

[-] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 3 hours ago

Dr. Waffleologist!

[-] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 hours ago

Keep it up and you'll be the next Waffle King!

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 14 points 8 hours ago

One square is the optimal waffle if you’re optimizing for syrup volume alone.

[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 4 points 8 hours ago

I will put you to work testing this theory.

Proceed with waffle preparation and delivery, I'll be waiting, and will provide my own syrup. Please note all waffles are to be gluten-free, as my body hates me and the things I enjoy.

[-] moody@lemmings.world 2 points 7 hours ago

If you serve the syrup in a cup, then the syrup to waffle ratio is infinite.

[-] bumblefumble@mander.xyz 3 points 5 hours ago

I post this comment quite often, but a number divided by zero is not infinity, so the syrup to waffle ratio would actually be undefined.

[-] TheTetrapod@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Fine, as the quantity of waffle approaches zero, the syrup to waffle ratio approaches infinity.

This tracks because I'm always left with syrup on my plate after finishing the waffle. So I've independently verified your hypothesis.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 7 hours ago

Give this man a medal

[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 2 points 5 hours ago

This ruined my day.

[-] palmtrees2309@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago

Aren't Hexagons the bestagon for tiling a plane for most holding capacity while reducing the "walls" than any shape?

[-] Zwiebel@feddit.org 16 points 7 hours ago

This here is just the best known solution to packing 17 squares specifically

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 6 hours ago

The honeycomb theorem is actually better than that: there isn't any way to divide up the plane with equal-area shapes (even if it's not a tiling in the sense of having any pattern) it won't be better than hexagons.

But that video can die in a fire!

[-] elbucho@lemmy.world 22 points 10 hours ago

I wonder if John Bidwell is haunted by his discovery. I know I would be. That shit is cursed as fuck.

[-] unnamedau@lemmy.ca 15 points 9 hours ago

on one hand, i want a 17-square waffle maker. on the other hand i think i would get brutally murdered by anyone i ever tried to make waffles for

[-] GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 5 hours ago

If they don't appreciate the 17-square waffle, they don't deserve it.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I don't think waffle enjoyers want one more square in the same waffle, they want a specific shape and syrup/butter ratio per square. This waffle bricks that with its thick sections.

[-] kozy138@slrpnk.net 5 points 9 hours ago

Shapes are dumb.

[-] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 hours ago

Great. Now cut that into 8 equal bites without spilling any syrup.

Fuckin' dumbass. THIS is what is meant by "book smart but not street smart".

this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
308 points (97.2% liked)

Science Memes

19612 readers
1676 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS