117
submitted 11 months ago by Evilphd666@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

what-the-hell Not The Onion

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 55 points 11 months ago

i appreciate the framing, but this is arguably weirder because the thing they're actually doing is installing spyware on their phones and computers that monitors all of their internet traffic. they're christian anti-fap extremists.

[-] regul@hexbear.net 44 points 11 months ago

Spyware on the Speaker of the House's phone, you say?

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 11 months ago

Don't worry. There is a zero percent chance that it could ever be exploited to where a third party could gain remote access to the Speaker's electronic devices to monitor his internet activity. The app he's using is secure.

Source: Trust me, bro

[-] AernaLingus@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago

Time to get maia arson crimew on the case

[-] Crucible@hexbear.net 29 points 11 months ago

Yup. This is what evangelicals are talking about when they say they care about 'being held accountable'

[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 10 points 11 months ago

the first time i heard this described was...an odd evening for sure

[-] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 48 points 11 months ago

Can you Americans get rid of these weird soulless pod people already

[-] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 23 points 11 months ago

sorry, my father and i monitor each other's voting habits too

[-] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 11 months ago

No they can't. It's a "democracy" you see.

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 37 points 11 months ago

The family that busts together sticks together.

[-] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 23 points 11 months ago

Bust together, stuck together

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago

There's an alternate punchline to this, but I finally found my line for what's too revolting to write

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I seriously contend that sexual repression is its own kink for Christofascists and they do get off to it on several levels, from secret-taboo gimmicks to exclusivity and denial-of-access to the poors of the secret-taboo gimmicks to the sheer authoritarian power rush of it all.

Mitt Romney's "Eyes Wide Shut" parties come to mind.

Even the desire to force others to conform to that repression seems like its own sexual pathology.

[-] edge@hexbear.net 27 points 11 months ago

This got posted in two separate communities so I'll repeat my comment here:

Seems like it's more that he's monitoring his son's porn intake in a way that makes it sound less like over-controlling spyware being imposed on the son and more like mutual accountability.

He's either already ideologically committed enough to fundamentalist Christianity to not watch porn, or more likely just has another device. So there's nothing for his son to "monitor".

[-] drhead@hexbear.net 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It is abusive either way. It's bad enough that the reinforcing mechanism being used is shame since that is absolutely not a healthy way to deal with mental health conditions, but in this case it's being disclosed to someone with power over them. And you know damn well that "don't be queer" is part of what they're being held accountable for.

edit: should probably clarify that almost nobody in these programs actually is using porn enough to where it is actually compulsive. For most organizations like this, the broader purpose it serves is similar to those Scientology confessionals where they release your whole file if you go against them. It's cult behavior. They want leverage.

[-] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Imagine what the CIA must have on him.

Edit: after reading it feels more like an evangelical thing than a sex pest thing. Not that those are mutually exclusive. Who knows what the future will bring? Dennis Hastert seemed like a normal guy when he was elected and look at what we know about his past now.

[-] Mokey@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago

yeah it's either something hilarious and weird or it's my day one guess that he's just closeted.

[-] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 22 points 11 months ago

Imagine thinking this is a totally normal and cool thing to do

[-] take_five_seconds@hexbear.net 19 points 11 months ago
[-] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 26 points 11 months ago

Help me step brother I'm stuck in my family values

[-] take_five_seconds@hexbear.net 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

hey son, watcha jerkin to today?

[-] VernetheJules@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago

are ya ~~winning~~ cumming son?

yes-honey-left

no dad

[-] SaniFlush@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago

Whatever happened to those good old fashioned values on which we used to rely?

[-] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 11 months ago
[-] Deadend@hexbear.net 17 points 11 months ago

The family that goons together 🤮 🤮

[-] 2Password2Remember@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago

least weird republican

Death to America

[-] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 10 points 11 months ago
[-] HauntedBySpectacle@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago

His son's name is literally Jack Johnson. His fucking name is Jacking his Johnson. His identity is masturbating.

If this were parody, it would be completely hamfisted. I wonder if Mike Johnson has ever searched for a ham fisting porn category

[-] GarfieldYaoi@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Now the CHUD ideology makes sense. They see real life through the same lens as porn.

  • All their racist assumptions? It's them being unable to control their raceplay fantasies from shaping their worldview.

  • They assume all LGBT people want to fuck them? Again, that's their sexual fantasies dominating their worldview.

  • Why they're misogynist? They see themselves as 'big daddy' from their porn and this is why they are too insecure in their masculinity to accept objectively good things like pro-environmental policies and the like because they think they'll be less like the macho porn man they see themselves as.

[-] HauntedBySpectacle@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago

I don't know if it's possible to say one lens precedes the other, and if it is, the order is probably different for different people. Pornbrain may get you to right wing thought, or vice versa, but it's all from a deep feeling of insecurity and resulting pleasure from hierarchy.

[-] GarfieldYaoi@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

These people think they are genetically superior to you.

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago

It’s called goon squad not goon individual

[-] JamesConeZone@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago

I grew up with these brain worms and am very familiar with this and have even had the spyware on my PC in the past. Taking all questions

[-] wahwahwah@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago
[-] JamesConeZone@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

In short, purity culture, misogyny, and unquestioned toxic masculinity.

Long answer, evangelicals believe three key myths: (1) having sex at a particular time with particular people is a matter of life/death, (2) men are monsters who cannot control their urges and thus must be forced, through shame and social controls, to not have sex and ruin their lives, (3) women must help guard men from themselves by not being sexy and are victims of deep misogyny via objectivation. The obsession with sex comes from these points and honestly "porn addiction" was talked about way more than any other addiction I remember from youth group/church

Evangelical men have male friends they call "accountability partners" that confess to each other when they looked at porn (not the other details). The idea is the shame of confessing with keep you from doing it. If that doesn't work, they will put spyware on their computers to keep them from even thinking about going to porn websites.

Why this father/son relationship? No idea, that seems weird to me but everything else is unfortunately very normal if unhealthy

[-] GarfieldYaoi@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

New bit: Fascism gets defeated because the left forms a red-brown alliance with r/KotakuInAction on trying to defend allowing half-naked women in vidya from Christian fundamentalists, the former losing interest in conservatism upon realizing that it means they can't wank off to said half-naked vidya women anymore.

Jokes aside, that's always what bothered me about misogyny. If men are supposed to be the "natural leaders" of women, why do traditional gender roles portray them as sex-obsessed gorillas? If God prefers men, why are men more susceptible to feeling the eeeeeeevil no-no emotion to the point it damages their functioning?

[-] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 11 months ago

I don’t see why this is so bad. It can help both of them come over this issue, no? It’s a little creepy having his son since he is a minor but if he were an adult I wouldn’t have an issue

[-] Parzivus@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago

Because its probably not an issue (beyond any other teenager) except for the fact that they're evangelicals and think you go to hell for 🔧 feral-hog

[-] SmokinStalin@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago

Wait his son's a minor? Nah the just fucky

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
117 points (100.0% liked)

news

23485 readers
679 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS