88
submitted 10 months ago by VILenin@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] duderium@hexbear.net 57 points 10 months ago

Is every business in the USA basically just living off of the handouts from imperialism and not really providing much in the way of services? Not just thinking of Boeing. Like the USA is having trouble supplying Ukraine, Hollywood movies are terrible (moreso than usual?), etc., etc. Like the entire USA is just designed to appreciate the value of assets based on holding a gun to the head of the global south.

[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 35 points 10 months ago

Since the financial crash finance capital has been hollowing out every single industry in this country, and that’s gone into overdrive since covid

Something something decline in the rate of profit

[-] Kaplya@hexbear.net 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Financialization.

88% of all S&P500 companies (2017 data) now have their top shareholders as one of the Big Three institutional investors (BlackRock, Vanguard, or State Street). This number was 25% in 2000.

Almost every major American corporation you can think of, with few exceptions like Amazon, Facebook, Tesla, Walmart etc., are practically owned by institutional investors. People like Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk are really the few exceptions left of individual capitalists you see in America, and even their controlling stakes in their own companies are slipping.

The rest of Corporate America are owned by the “faceless” bourgeois class who invests in the corporate assets through institutional investors while being divorced from making key decisions about the companies. The only purpose left is for the line to go up, even if it means all the established corporations are stripped bare in the process.

This is what financial oligarchy really means (I really don’t think most people truly apprehend the significance of this).

Hollywood movies are terrible (moreso than usual?)

The same thing is happening with Hollywood. If you’re interested in the nitty gritty details, read this paper titled Financialized Hollywood: Institutional Investment, Venture Capital, and Private Equity in the Film and Television Industry

The upshot is that all the major media companies: Disney, Time Warner, CBS, Comcast, Netflix, Verizon, AT&T are all essentially owned by the same Big Three (BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street), collective owning an average of ~15% controlling stake in those companies and wield disproportionate amount of influence.

[-] star_wraith@hexbear.net 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I have a prior career in equity research and M&A. It was always shocking to me how little direct involvement there was with institutional investors. They typically just try and find competent people to sit in their place on the board, but these board members are so disconnected from the businesses themselves. Most board members sit on the boards for multiple companies and are involved with any one company for a day or two each quarter, and that’s about it.

I am also very curious to see how the growth of passive investing, index funds, managing investments by sector/asset class, really any sort of investing other than single business-level among institutional investors impacts the future of capitalism. Vanguard invests almost entirely this way. 40 years ago this type of investing was much more rare, now it’s the dominant form. They aren’t interested in the performance of a single company, only the performance as a sector / asset class / economy.

[-] Kaplya@hexbear.net 6 points 10 months ago

I have been doing some research into this (also where I got the figures above from), and it seems that the institutional investors generally don’t actively engage in the decision making process (i.e. leaving it to the board of directors), but what they found is that the board of directors could already have adjusted their behavior, on their own, to track with the investors’ goals.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-and-politics/article/hidden-power-of-the-big-three-passive-index-funds-reconcentration-of-corporate-ownership-and-new-financial-risk/30AD689509AAD62F5B677E916C28C4B6

Through an analysis of proxy vote records we find that the Big Three do utilize coordinated voting strategies and hence follow a centralized corporate governance strategy. However, they generally vote with management, except at director (re-)elections. Moreover, the Big Three may exert “hidden power” through two channels: First, via private engagements with management of invested companies; and second, because company executives could be prone to internalizing the objectives of the Big Three.

[-] privatized_sun@hexbear.net 21 points 10 months ago

neofeudalism is about extracting rents

[-] Hexbear2@hexbear.net 18 points 10 months ago

Yes, the USA is in terminal decline, it has been since the dotcom bust. The USA gets a little shittier every year.

[-] professionalduster@hexbear.net 43 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
  1. it was 10 weeks old? fuck
  2. is the 737 MAX a death machine or what? the fuck is up with Boeing. neoliberalism...?
[-] 420stalin69@hexbear.net 25 points 10 months ago
[-] professionalduster@hexbear.net 20 points 10 months ago

haha

we are doomed

[-] GinAndJuche@hexbear.net 42 points 10 months ago

I’m still willing to bet they’ll get the safety waiver. Boeing is too influential to not get its way.

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 44 points 10 months ago

When I was an Inspector the regional FAA manager in Arizona would roll over for any small business tyrant throwing a tantrum, Boeing could get a plane made of paper and duct tape certified if they wanted

[-] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 11 points 10 months ago

I worked for a jet company for a while and the ease with which the FAA accepted business arguments blew my mind and scared the shit out of me. The chances of failure were still small, but I could get anything through by comparison (fairly close if you take specific values)+it's not profitable to change

[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 42 points 10 months ago

Alaska Airlines when they land: "I'm gonna give you a $5 food voucher to fuck off."

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 36 points 10 months ago

Expires in 20 minutes, only for use at the one restaurant on the other side of the airport

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 13 points 10 months ago

better run if you want to make it in time, hope you don't have any bags

[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 38 points 10 months ago

It's normal for 10 week old planes to still be teething. Nothing to see here.

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 35 points 10 months ago

Wow so snowflakes can't handle a little wind on their faces. If your first reaction is to freak out from the plane coming apart at 30,000 feet maybe you should carry a safety blanket 😂😂😂

[-] LeopardShepherd@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago

Hahaha triggered libs!! 😜😂🤣😵‍💫🤡

[-] Sphere@hexbear.net 22 points 10 months ago

GROUND ALL BOEING AIRCRAFT PERMANENTLY

[-] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

See you say that, but their early attempts to make the MAX self-grounding were poorly received.

[-] Sphere@hexbear.net 10 points 10 months ago
[-] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 5 points 10 months ago

Happy birthday to the ground!

[-] Quaxamilliom@hexbear.net 18 points 10 months ago

Typical American burger bun construction.

[-] red_stapler@hexbear.net 18 points 10 months ago

That aircraft (MAX, naturally) has an emergency exit that not every airline uses. When not in use it's plugged and covered up. Seems like the plug failed or something.

[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 10 months ago

except no one has indicated it was an exit, it was just part of the fuselage

[-] red_stapler@hexbear.net 5 points 10 months ago

Yes, it’s part of the fuselage meant to permanently block an exit.

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 17 points 10 months ago
[-] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 14 points 10 months ago

The McDonnell-Douglas merger destroyed Boeing's engineering culture.

[-] Barabas@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago

Who knew that cutting out any thoughts of build quality to earn the shareholders some extra money would backfire.

One of the inherent problems with capitalism is that it always tends to this shit. Once you are a market leader companies just start cutting quality. Nobody cares about long term thinking, just immediate gains.

[-] Hexbear2@hexbear.net 13 points 10 months ago

I'm genuinely fearfull of flying on Boeing Aircraft. I fucking hate that the U.S. Government let them buy McDonald-Douglas. The MD88, now that was a real aircraft.

[-] motherofmonsters@hexbear.net 11 points 10 months ago

David Zaslav has gone too far with the 737 HBOMax

[-] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

MRW they've finally gotten it right.

[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 10 months ago

I didn't see any mention of it being the door. As far as I've read and seen it was just a section of the plane.

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 8 points 10 months ago

It is an optional emergency exit, if you don’t want it they plug it. But it is still a “door” that you can theoretically open from the outside; you just find a wall on the other side.

[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 10 months ago
[-] DengistDonnieDarko@hexbear.net 6 points 10 months ago

pete "actually plane doors come off all the time."

[-] sooper_dooper_roofer@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago

Boeing is in a mid-freefall since 2018

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 3 points 10 months ago

cool to see that planned obsolescence is coming to passenger airplanes now

this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
88 points (100.0% liked)

news

23568 readers
645 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS