144
submitted 2 years ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/news@hexbear.net
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 85 points 2 years ago

Imagine keeping the names of all your spies on a payroll database exposed to the internet lol

[-] MayoPete@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago

On a file called mi6-final_FINAL_V4_DO_NOT_SHARE.db

[-] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

It’s likely most of them are office workers, handlers, and “embassy staff.” So nothing too damaging. Most of their sources are likely coded, but considering the CIA’s sources were all killed in china, I can’t imagine britbongs having much more sophisticated tradecraft

[-] joaomarrom@hexbear.net 75 points 2 years ago

it's Britain so I imagine someone in MI6 clicked the "SECRET-TRANS-CELEBRITIES.zip" file that they received in their government email and now they'll have to find a way to blame this on Hamas antisemitism

[-] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 48 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm interested to hear just how 'bad' it was - I of course don't trust the exact figure they put out, but its hard to know if they'll inflate the statistics because China Bad, or if they'll deflate the statistics because MI6/Britain is James Bond good.

It's so silly. All the spy stuff. It's like - well we hacked them, then they hacked us, then we hacked them, then they hacked us, then we hacked them, for as long as computers have been a part of each nations infrastructure.

So, 'Breaking News' everyone, spies are still spying. The spying will continue until they stop spying on us.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 55 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] SoyViking@hexbear.net 36 points 2 years ago

Some of these points are embarrassingly obvious. Of course your spy's cover as a diplomat is going to suck if he didn't went to the school all diplomats go to and doesn't live up to objective requirements like that of citizenship.

I wonder how amateurish these diplomatic covers are today and if it is only the yanks who are this bad at them.

[-] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 32 points 2 years ago

Somebody should write a comedy/parody of espionage thrillers around this. Owning your opponent so hard they think they're crawling with infiltrators is damn funny.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 2 years ago
[-] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago

Well there was also that too lol. The main CIA guy in charge of rooting out KGB moles was, you guessed it, a KGB mole himself.

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago

Something something owning the means of personnel

[-] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I remember reading that a lot of the CIA/FBI guys were cocky and refused to believe they could be infiltrated which led to delays in investigations for moles lol. That or they suspected minority agents instead of white ones.

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

Aldrich Ames, right?

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Half of these are so obvious I refuse to believe that's all of it or even is it and Totrov wasn't fucking with the CIA because it would do bad things to my mental health. Gotta say folks, that's bullshit, there's a more shadowy, more competent level of CIA at play that Totrov didn't know about

The Cold War over, a senior and very experienced officer was dispatched to Japan to seek out Totrov and offer him a vast sum of money for his "memoirs." Totrov’s retort was typically blunt. "Have you not read what is on my file at Langley? It says, 'Not to be Pitched.'"

Big dick move though

the fact that CIA officers replacing one another tended to take on the same post within the embassy hierarchy, drive the same make of vehicle, rent the same apartment and so on. Why? Because the personnel office in Langley shuffled and dealt overseas postings with as little effort as required.

I'm becoming the fucking joker here I've had better Opsec than that as a teenager doing dumb shit

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 years ago

The incompetence is absolutely stunning. CIA managed to build up so much mystique around itself, but when you read up on how they actually operate you quickly realize that this org is full of utter clowns.

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

I see your point but I still refuse to believe "Our last guy got found out, here's his spy job, his spy communications line, his spy car with which you go to the same spy house he did. You also lack 9/10 requirements for having this job on paper. Watch out for moles, the only reason we can imagine that the last guy got found out." is real and no argument can convince me of this for reasons stated above. I'm going full conspiracy theorist here, the truth is too horrifying to me and I instead opt to construct some shadowy cabal that pulls the strings and put this on as a front. I mean what, we couldn't forge some papers here?

I'd retire clothes for like 3 months when I was a drunk teenager stealing road signs for funsies just in case a witness description of "Black hoodie, jeans, average height man (probably)" got out and somebody else saw it and connected it to me revealing I was drunk of my ass near location X at the time. If I believe this, this would've put me in like top 1% of removed, apparently. I refuse to believe entire governemnts get toppled and the course of history changed by a bunch of dudes who couldn't get on the level of OPSEC of an alcoholic teenager, sorry. I now consider the CIA a front organisation putting out chaff to distract from the actual agency, the Even-More-Central-Intelligence-Agency (EMCIA), which is so good at their job none of us know about it

[-] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Resident spies tend to be easier to identify. You start off by assuming everyone wearing a suit and lanyard at an embassy is intelligence and you’d be correct 70% of the time. The guys who are gun running, meeting monarchs to traffic children, meeting friends of warlords and drug lords - they tend to be less identifiable.

You give them too much credit. I mean the KGB’s intelligence was the most sophisticated in the world and the USSR got toppled. No amount of intelligence is going to save you from incompetence and malice in more powerful positions. Not to mention, the CIA was communicating with sources through fake websites with passwords hidden in the page elements lol

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 years ago

I very much agree that what's being described are just comical levels of incompetence. Small children could run a more competent spy organization than this.

[-] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

Espionage is an open secret. No one serious considers embassies a place of diplomacy and administration unless it’s an insignificant country.

[-] SwitchyWitchyandBitchy@hexbear.net 45 points 2 years ago

At this point, common Chinese counterintel win.

[-] D61@hexbear.net 45 points 2 years ago

The government will not name the country involved, but Sky News understands this to be China.

confusion

The cyberattack was on a payroll ...

... All salaries will be paid this month.

wayne-jammin

The contractor system is not connected to the main MoD computer systems and has been taken down with a review launched.

A system so important that its management was contracted out.

No idea where the breach came from, or how it was done, or exactly who the contracting firm running that system is but "CHINA CHINA CHINA!"

[-] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

The US department of energy has its own paramilitary force that guards nuclear sites. Despite wearing camo, having a military commander, and considered so called “elite,” they’re just contractors from a private agency - not even self employed.

The DOE protective forces are all contractors, with the management of the force varying from site to site.

Don’t you feel safe that the most militaristic, bloodthirsty nation on earth hires mall cops to guard nukes? It’s even more weird than guys who protect spy bases or Area 51 because they usually wear the company’s provided uniforms but the FPF wear camp like soldiers lol.

[-] D61@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I still have it my head that 99% of the land based ICMB arsenal is 100% incapable of launching and I refuse to be corrected.

So, overpaying Paul Blarts to watch the fences around the silos while the military nuke techs sit in their holes playing video games and watching cartoons actually makes me feel pretty comfortable.

wear camp like soldiers lol

I'm sure this is a typo and you mean to say "camo" but soldiers on guard duty in drag queen getup makes me smile.

[-] Greenleaf@hexbear.net 44 points 2 years ago
[-] wombat@hexbear.net 31 points 2 years ago

china is reaching levels of basedness long thought impossible

[-] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I bet China must have reaaaalllly dedicated all its national resources and efforts over the last few years to achieve a hack of this magnitude.

Unrelated, remember when the UK treasury was trying to recruit a head of cyber security and only offered a salary of £50k?

[-] MayoPete@hexbear.net 18 points 2 years ago

"Oi, what you mean the bloke we paid 50k to put the passwords in plaintext on a public-facing server?"

[-] Sons_of_Ferrix@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

There was a bit of confusion about that cuz in England they call "passwords" Wordie-Daffer-SiteSeeSee.

[-] AmerikaLosesWW3@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 2 years ago

Hacker Man

ゴゴゴゴゴゴゴゴゴゴゴゴゴゴゴゴゴ

[-] MayoPete@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago
[-] WeedReference420@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago
[-] Commiejones@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago

Russia should take responsibility just for lulz

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 years ago

lol yeah like what's UK gonna do sanction them 😂

[-] theother2020@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

That sentence (title) just gets better and better

[-] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

:kim-philby-shining:

[-] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago
this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
144 points (100.0% liked)

news

24484 readers
418 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS