527
Literally 1984 rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GluWu@lemm.ee 66 points 3 months ago

This is a masturbation only museum you filthy animals.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 61 points 3 months ago

Love Museum, Seoul, South Korea

The day love died:

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 months ago

Bummer. Looks like there are some captures of the old site from the wayback machine

still some photos of exhibits floating around if you search

[-] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 3 months ago

Zoomed in on her face, accidentally got a jumpscare from the kid behind her.

[-] Old_Jimmy_Twodicks@sh.itjust.works 39 points 3 months ago

Getting strong Lionel Hutz vibes from the comma placement..."No, sex!"

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Better get rid of this bar association logo too.

[-] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I know someone who's gonna be really disappointed.

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 9 points 3 months ago

My god that character behind her scares me the first time I saw him

[-] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

See, that comma is doing some interesting work here. My interpretation is that sex itself is not allowed to enter the museum. I'm not seeing any rules prohibiting patrons from engaging in naked fun time.

[-] FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago
[-] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Or dressed as an astronaut and a banana, i don't kink shame.

[-] NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee 30 points 3 months ago

I see where your confusion came from. You're looking for the interactive museum.

Just down the road.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 30 points 3 months ago

That museum is great, but "museum" is perhaps too high falutin of a term for it. As I recall they had one thing that could be considered an exhibit, about the history of drawn erotica in Korea. The rest was like sexy statues and such.

Still worth the trip.

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 15 points 3 months ago

Sounds a bit like the sex museum in Amsterdam. Weeee bit of cultural stuff thrown in but mainly just shock factor for the tourists.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 3 months ago

Museum of Sex in New York seemed alright. Had a collection of Tijuana Bibles. It's been a while since I went, but I dunno if I'd consider any of it particularly shocking given what it's meant to be. That can be very subjective, of course.

One thing is that a well run academic museum does collections first and exhibits second. 99% of what they have is stored away for safekeeping, and can only be viewed and handled by qualified academics who make an appointment. I'm not sure any of these places would qualify.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

Even that one seemed to have a little more historical gravitas, but that was definitely great too.

[-] nicki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 3 months ago

Just pretend to be part of the exhibition.

[-] Visstix@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

There's always a reason why they had to put it on a sign.

[-] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

I can't believe I'm about to type "love museum" into the internet.

...

I can't believe the first result was an exhibition about Vincent van Gogh at the National Gallery.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 12 points 3 months ago

Filed under false advertising, wtf?

[-] Jimbo@yiffit.net 10 points 3 months ago
[-] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 months ago

It's a love museum, after all, not a sex museum.

[-] Samsy@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago

Challenge accepted!

*fucks a burger

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
527 points (100.0% liked)

196

16442 readers
1804 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS