505
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Cable companies, advertising firms, and newspapers are asking courts to block a federal "click-to-cancel" rule that would force businesses to make it easier for consumers to cancel services. Lawsuits were filed yesterday, about a week after the Federal Trade Commission approved a rule that "requires sellers to provide consumers with simple cancellation mechanisms to immediately halt all recurring charges."

The 5th Circuit is generally regarded as the nation's most conservative, but the 6th Circuit also has a majority of judges appointed by Republican presidents. When identical lawsuits are filed in multiple circuits, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation randomly selects a court to handle the case.

The NCTA cable lobby group, which represents companies like Comcast and Charter, have complained about the rule's impact on their ability to talk customers out of canceling. NCTA CEO Michael Powell claimed during a January 2024 hearing that "a consumer may easily misunderstand the consequences of canceling and it may be imperative that they learn about better options" and that the rule's disclosure and consent requirements raise "First Amendment issues."

"Too often, businesses make people jump through endless hoops just to cancel a subscription," FTC Chair Lina Khan said. "The FTC's rule will end these tricks and traps, saving Americans time and money. Nobody should be stuck paying for a service they no longer want."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Fuck the circuits. It's absolute bullshit that entities can game the system and shop for "favorable" judges because of the appellate courts.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Yeah even if you literally cannot get their service and they have to cancel you (which happened when I moved) they still talk and talk and talk way more than is necessary for a cancellation. They even look up your location data so they can confirm what you already told them their own app said, screw these fuckers.

I swear if you're the kind of sociopath that's pro-Trump, them saving this rule alone should be enough to get you to vote Harris.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

They made their own bed here by making it so ridiculously hard.

I was going to a gym and I moved to get out of that $20 a month contract I had to write a letter and deliver it to them by hand.

When I canceled my DirecTV service I was on the phone for over an hour. Half of that was spent waiting for someone.

If you want me to have to talk to somebody before exiting a contract I'm okay with that but I need to talk to them right then and I need them to take no for an answer.

Also the whole raising the rates until people terminate and then offering them lower rates is absolute bullshit

[-] yonder@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

I think waiting on the phone for an hour just to argue with someone to cancel a subscription is reasonable, as long as the signup process also involved waiting on the phone for an hour before an agent tried to talk you out of buying the service.

But if I signed up on a website in 30 seconds, it should take tine or less to unsubscribe on the same website.

[-] Grangle1@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago

Well, no shit, that's what the rule is SUPPOSED to do! No more impossible-to-cancel subscriptions, please.

[-] JordanZ@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

It’s your internet. Who cancels that without already moving to another ISP? I work from home so not having internet even for short durations is a non-starter. Forcing me to talk to someone is an absolute waste of everyone’s time. They have a zero percent chance of keeping me because I already left. I just want the bills to stop for a service I disconnected from.

I understand the whole ‘game’ for pricing/discounts but when you legitimately are leaving then this is just dumb. I think the whole game around discounts is dumb too but that’s capitalism.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

if im cancelling, you trying to talk me out of it is not only a waste of my time it is a fruitless endeavor. just cut it and move on,leeches

[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

But usually the retention departments have the most leeway to give you discounts 😀

Just call and threaten to cancel and suddenly you get 50% off for 6 months or something.

(Works very well with Audible, the further you go in the cancel flow on the website, the bigger discounts you get - you can repeat the “I quit” threat about once a year.)

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

doesnt matter. shoddy service isnt worth any kind of discount.

[-] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I have great service. I just hate that I have to play the game of "pretending to cancel".

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

my current service is also pretty good. the one i got when i moved here 4 years ago was trash though. not for anything they did other than advertise availability here which was sketchy about a week after i signed up. held on for a year hoping it would improve since the area was seeing more people locating in the area but nope. same crappy service. so cancelled and went back to a previous vendor as they had been making acquisitions nearby.

[-] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I have been very fortunate to have good service for essentially the entirety of my life of broadband. Only going back to when optimum first showed up, they were the only game in town, and it would have issues during times of day when there was too much traffic at the node. Since FiOS showed up (not to shill), it's honestly been phenomenal, when you put aside the typical bullshit the providers pull. The actual service of packets in packets out, or whatever the Internet is, has been great.

Maybe if their retention rate drops they'll just lower their costs to those rates, or better their services.

[-] w3dd1e@lemm.ee 56 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I’m so sick of the 5th Circuit. We need legislation to end judge shopping. Every damn article about some terrible decision seems to come out of the Fifth Circuit.

“We live in the United States of Texas, Louisiana & Mississippi.” —The American Prospect

[-] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 116 points 2 days ago

a consumer may easily misunderstand the consequences of canceling and it may be imperative that they learn about better options

See, if it's easy to cancel, then a consumer can leave your service, try something else, and then cancel that and come back if they don't like the alternative.

Also, imperative for who? Your bottom line?

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 51 points 2 days ago

Also wouldn't the argument apply to subscribing as well? Consumers may not understand the consequences of subscribing to said service. Therefore, "click to subscribe" should also be banned.

[-] Archer@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Won’t someone please think of the shareholders!!!

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago

I read this as: "the customer has contract terms with us, where if they cancel they must pay termination fees and other fees where applicable and if they cancel they might financially harm themselves"

To which the obvious response would be, well you would list those on the page that you click. (But also... why your business model rely on cancelation fees?)

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Definitely then the issue lies with click to subscribe, and not with click to cancel.

If the customer is insufficiently informed of any penalties for cancelling, then he shouldn't have been allowed to subscribe in the first place.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Also if that’s the case they shouldn’t be able to automatically renew at the end of a contract

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 1 day ago

I guess they prefer getting customer chargebacks which will cost them bank fees than just letting people cancel.

[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Lol!!! This is fantastic! They shouldn't be trying to talk them out of cancelling to begin with!

[-] unphazed@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

I will say this much... I am knowledgeable that a lot of people cancel because they can't figure out how to use the service, or don't know enough about the service to know they'll need 4+ apps or addons to get what they have currently. Informing them after they tell you what they want sometimes makes them realize switching isn't better. Shouldn't be a long call though, about 15 min.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I learned something the last time I had to deal with phony charges. If you tell Visa to not pay for a service or product that you never got, then they won't pay.

Not that visa is great. They steal your money too. But at least it's a mechanism to help yourself.

[-] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 94 points 2 days ago

That’s the whole point

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 43 points 2 days ago

Just for reference: in my State (somewhere in Latin America), since 2007, we have a law that TL;DRs to "if you offer a service through a certain mean, you must offer the cancellation method through the same mean; plus by phone, or internet, or snail mail".

It works like a charm because, contrariwise to what Michael Powell is claiming, customers aren't such disgustingly stupid trash that will "accidentally" hit the cancel button, nor they deserve to be punished by making cancellation a fucking pain in the arse. (There's probably similar laws elsewhere.)

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

But, Calling and threatening "I want to cancel" is the only way to get them to lower the $120 fuck-you price back to the market accurate $40 I signed up for.

[-] apocalypticat@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

You can still threaten to cancel. It will be even more effective when the power of cancelling is in your hands instead of theirs, and as easy as one click. Not sure if you were being sarcastic.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

I wish the FTC would tackle that next. Why should I pay twice as much for the exact same service my neighbor has because they signed up a month ago? I don't mind rewards being given for signing up but the first bill (aside from installation fees) shouldn't be any lower than mine.

Internet also needs to be regulated like a utility because it basically is one at this point.

Friendly reminder that under Obama internet service providers we were classified as utilities under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934.

Trump appointed Shit Pie, who reversed that rule as well as the net neutrality rule.

People, if you haven’t already, please vote.

[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

My phone plan just dropped the $10/month discount for autopay because they’re price-gouging shit garglers. The second I clicked on the “port out number” option, they put up a banner offering $10/mo off for the next year. I do appreciate not waiting three hours on the phone just to turn down the offer anyway. MVNO it is!

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

When I want to cancel I want to cancel. I don't want to be put in line for over half an hour and then have to have a painful argument with some poor employee who gets punished if I somehow figure out the secret code that makes them cancel the account. And then have to do it all over again one month later because the account didn't cancel because of "technical problems".

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 days ago

If they make it that hard to cancel, they should make it that hard to subscribe.

[-] systemguy_64@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

But how will we force you to listen to some agent in the Philippines ramble on about how great the service is, and offer you a 6 month promo rate that you will forget about??

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 26 points 2 days ago

The fact that they are able to make these arguments and a judge takes it seriously... Is all you need to know who rules the peasants.

First Amendment now protects a corpos right to fuck you over.

But when private comapany blocks your speech on their platform for any reason is not 1a issue?

Hmmm, do these clowns have to be logically consistent or do they just win every time.

[-] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 days ago

"Won't someone please think of the shareholders‽"

Sucks to suck, I'm so looking forward to easy cancellation from services.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago

I really hope they roll this out to all services, including:

  • gyms
  • banks
  • insurance

If the customer really wants to undo it after, I'm sure the company can help with that...

[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

As someone living in the EU, I am shocked by these stories.

In my home country in the east you, you can basically cancel most things monthly, or just stop paying, and they’ll figure it out and kick you off the service after a few weeks.

In Germany it can be a bit more annoying, but cancellation is always legally well regulated.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Things are usually pretty easy, but there are bad actors in each case. Most gyms will end your service if you stop paying, but some will consider it debt and hit your credit until you pay. Likewise for most banks and some insurance companies. To "properly" close these services can require a fair amount of effort, such as physically going to the gym/branch to cancel, mailing a specific form, or calling and waiting on hold on the phone to get to a rep. It's usually pretty easy, but there are a lot of companies that make it as difficult as they think they can get away with.

I'm sure a lot of it is technically illegal, but very few people will actually file a lawsuit.

That said, most of the time it's perfectly reasonable, which is why it's important to check how the customer service is before signing up for something.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago

Do gyms next.

Oh, and can we also extend this to banks? Sometimes closing a bank account or credit card is like pulling teeth (have to call between 9-5 EST, must navigate stupid phone menu first, then you need to listen to and agree to a disclosure agreement, etc. If I want to cancel, I should be able clear the account and cancel.

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago

My gym required me to go the location I signed up and cancel in person lul. I just told them I don't live in the country anymore and I'm calling from abroad, they can either cancel or get charge backed. They canceled quick.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago

Good! Even though I HATE these BULLSHIT Services that cost me THOUSANDS a Year that I can't Opt Out of it's in MY Best Interest to let Corporations SCREW ME because I'm a Republican who HATES Corporations but I Hate GAY KIDS More something something TRANS ON ME!

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 12 points 2 days ago

NCTA CEO Michael Powell claimed during a January 2024 hearing that "a consumer may easily misunderstand the consequences of canceling and it may be imperative that they learn about better options" ...

Perhaps the consumer has "learn[ed] about better options" at another company, or that a "better option" for them is to not purchase the service at all from anyone. I'm sure the ... ::flips pages:: ... cable company is offering a completely holistic assessment of the consumer's needs to help them make the best decision for themselves, right?

...and that the rule's disclosure and consent requirements raise "First Amendment issues."

"It is our First Amendment right to browbeat people into ~~not being our customers anymore!~~ staying as our customers when they tell us they don't want to be!"

(edit oops)

[-] Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Yippee! The death of cable is fast approaching, hopefully.

[-] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

Just in time for the rapid enshitification of streaming services...and the cycle repeats. Greedy people always ruin all the good things we have.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
505 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

58893 readers
3733 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS