682
And 299999999 is divisible by 13 (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 weeks ago by m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
36 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TwilightKiddy@programming.dev 87 points 3 weeks ago

The divisability rule for 7 is that the difference of doubled last digit of a number and the remaining part of that number is divisible by 7.

E.g. 299'999 → 29'999 - 18 = 29'981 → 2'998 - 2 = 2'996 → 299 - 12 = 287 → 28 - 14 = 14 → 14 mod 7 = 0.

It's a very nasty divisibility rule. The one for 13 works in the same way, but instead of multiplying by 2, you multiply by 4. There are actually a couple of well-known rules for that, but these are the easiest to remember IMO.

[-] urda@lebowski.social 63 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks I hate it

[-] veroxii@aussie.zone 9 points 3 weeks ago

This math will not stand man!

[-] darkpanda@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago

If all of the digits summed recursively reduce to a 9, then the number is divisible by 9 and also by 3.

If the difference between the sums of alternating sets digits in a number is divisible by 11, then the number itself is divisible by 11.

That’s all I can remember, but yay for math right?

[-] TwilightKiddy@programming.dev 8 points 3 weeks ago

Well, on the side of easy ones there is "if the last digit is divisible by 2, whole number is divisible by 2". Also works for 5. And if you take last 2 digits, it works for 4. And the legendary "if it ends with 0, it's divisible by 10".

[-] darkpanda@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

There’s also the classic “no three positive integers a, b, and c to satisfy a**n + b**n = c**n for values of n greater than 2“ trick but my proof is too large to fit in this comment.

[-] JamesStallion@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Fucking lol

[-] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Its never divisible by zero, and its always divisible by one

[-] wicked@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago

Never say never. 1/0 = 0

[-] LordTrychon@startrek.website 1 points 3 weeks ago

Interesting read. Thank you.

[-] levzzz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

The 9 rule works for 3 too The 6 rule is if (divisible by 3 and divisible by 2)

[-] candybrie@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

I think it might be easier just to do the division.

[-] m_f@midwest.social 62 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

⅐ = 0.1̅4̅2̅8̅5̅7̅

The above is 42857 * 7, but you also get interesting numbers for other subsets:

     7 * 7 =     49
    57 * 7 =    399
   857 * 7 =   5999
  2857 * 7 =  19999
 42857 * 7 = 299999
142857 * 7 = 999999

Related to cyclic numbers:

142857 * 1 = 142857
142857 * 2 = 285714
142857 * 3 = 428571
142857 * 4 = 571428
142857 * 5 = 714285
142857 * 6 = 857142
142857 * 7 = 999999
[-] Usernamealreadyinuse@lemmy.world 46 points 3 weeks ago

42857 for those who wonder

And for ops title: 23076923

[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 33 points 3 weeks ago

Actually disgusting

[-] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Never realized there are so many rules for divisibility. This post fits in this category:

Forming an alternating sum of blocks of three from right to left gives a multiple of 7

299,999 would be 999 - 299 = 700 which is divisible by 7. And if we simply swap grouped digits to 999,299, it is also divisible by 7 since 299 - 999 = -700.

And as for 13:

Form the alternating sum of blocks of three from right to left. The result must be divisible by 13

So we have 999 - 999 + 299 = 299.

You can continue with other rules so we can then take this

Add 4 times the last digit to the rest. The result must be divisible by 13.

So for 299 it's 29 + 9 * 4 = 65 which divides by 13. Pretty cool.

[-] grubberfly@mander.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That is indeed an absurd amount of rules (specially for 7) !

It should be fun to develop each proof. Particularly the 1,3,2,-1,-3,-2 rule, which at first sight seems could be easily expanded to any other number.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks, Satan

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Wait until you learn of 51/17.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks, I hate it

[-] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

With 17, I understand that you're referring to how 299,999 is also divisible by 17. What is the 51 reference, though? I know there's 3,999,999,999,999 but that starts with a 3. Not the same at all.

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

57 / 17 = 3. That messes up with my brain.

[-] scutiger@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Your math is wrong.

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

That it is. And it's not just my math that is wrong.

[-] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 3 weeks ago

I know you opened your calculator app to check it.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago

49 is divisible by 7, so why not?

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

Can we just say it isn't? Like that's an exception, and then the rest of math can just go on like normal

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

So what? Being a prime number doesn't mean it can't be a divisor. Or is it the string of 9s that's supposed to be upsetting? Why? What difference does it make?

[-] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago

Phew, for a moment I worried that 2.9999... was divisible by 7 and I woke up in some kind of alternate universe

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 points 3 weeks ago

…9999 is exactly equal to -1.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 3 weeks ago

But only in base 10.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 1 points 3 weeks ago

Well yes of course. If it was a different base, writing it that way if the symbol was even available would be a different number.

[-] SerpentPeaked@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

Isn’t every number divisible by 7?

[-] ilovededyoupiggy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 weeks ago

Yup, this is just a coordinated smear campaign from Big Integer.

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Yes technically almost every number is divisible by another in some way and you're left with a remainder that spans plenty of decimal places.

But common parlance when something is said to be divisible is that the end results is a round number...

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
682 points (97.8% liked)

Science Memes

11278 readers
3397 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sal@mander.xyz
fossilesque@mander.xyz
SciBot@mander.xyz