459
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago

And I love them for it. Seriously comfortable society is built on and by nerds.

[-] slice@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago

Yeah I love it too. It was quite an interesting deep dive into that topic.

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago
[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 days ago

vsauce music starts playing

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 days ago

"what" is a word, correct.

[-] Hupf@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago

What is Truth and what is God?

[-] superkret@feddit.org 56 points 1 week ago

If you want a clear definition, ask a mathematician:

A word is any written product of group elements and their inverses.

Or a computer scientist:

A word is a fixed-sized datum handled as a unit by the instruction set or the hardware of the processor.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 6 days ago

Maybe ironically, neither one would be appropriate as a linguistic definition.

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

i wonder what the inverse of the letters in the english alphabet are. since it has a non-prime number of letters (26 to be exact), we know that some letters won’t have inverses. i wonder which letters don’t have inverses. i guess it would be pretty easy to find out if you use the standard alphabet ordering and then port the alphabet over to ℤ/26ℤ, but that’s not a particularly satisfying answer.

[-] Malgas@beehaw.org 3 points 6 days ago

Or, in either field (formal language theory bridges both) it can mean any string of symbols, letters, or tokens.

[-] folekaule@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago
[-] four@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 week ago

"word" is a four letter word

[-] dessimbelackis@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

I think you’ll find that in actual fact “bird” is the word

[-] pseudo@jlai.lu 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The definition still applies.

[-] prex@aussie.zone 4 points 6 days ago
[-] spicytuna62@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Don't you know? About the bird?

[-] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Birds are not real, though, are they?

[-] Entropywins@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

And it begins...probably be 2 days until I get the song out of my head

[-] orb360@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

My body is ready!

[-] lugal@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

Please, it's w*rd, we want to keep this f*mily friendly

[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago
[-] lugal@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

Watch your l*nguage, my dear

[-] railwhale@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 week ago

Recursive ~~acronyms~~ definitions

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

that's a bit wordy

[-] archonet@lemy.lol 15 points 1 week ago
[-] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago
[-] lugal@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago

Still even people new to writing have a good intuition about that but formalizing this intuition is a different story

[-] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago

Saussure feelings

[-] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

As a linguist, I'd just shrug.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 days ago

"everyone knows what a word is, that is the definion"

[-] shneancy@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

the cries of alien archaeologists from the far future echo in the distance

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
459 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

11004 readers
3312 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS