179
submitted 4 days ago by GiddyGap@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 75 points 4 days ago

Yup. Congrats 15 million Democrats and progressives that didn't vote, you just gave us the greenlight for Democrats to never run a imperfect Democratic candidate.

Congrats! You did it!

[-] ME5SENGER_24@lemm.ee 31 points 4 days ago

I’m really getting tired of this narrative. It completely invalidates that +73M people voted for Trump. More than 73 million people thought he was the right choice. It’s less important that Harris got 15 million less votes than Biden and more important that more than 73 million brain dead morons exist in this country and there’s an extremely high chance that at least 25% will procreate and continue our Idiocracy long beyond our lifetimes.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Well too damn bad because it's true. Those 73 million were always going to vote this way, every Democrat knew that, every progressive knew that. They always vote for a Republican even if that guy is a convicted felon and rapist, we all knew that going in and they did exactly that because scorpions are going to scorpion.

Ever Democrat and progressive knew the stakes, they knew what the opposition was going to do and they didn't show the fuck up.

Hell no, these fascist condoning, racist condoning jerks get a lot of blame here as well they should.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 21 points 4 days ago

And it will have repercussions for decades and decades. Many, even many younger people, will now not see any changes in the overall makeup of SCOTUS in their lifetime.

[-] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

It's crazy. He was already tied for sixth most SC justices appointed (with seven other presidents). If Alito and Thomas retire and he replaces them, he'll only be behind Washington, FDR, and Taft. His numbers for other judicial appointments were already very high as well.

People really do not appreciate how long we'll be feeling the consequences of this if we survive this term and move on to someone sane.

[-] akilou@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago

It's not 15 million, it's a few tens of thousands in a handful of swing states. Millions more Harris voters in New England, New York, and California would have had the same result.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yes it is. Don't misconstrue the results.

Trump is currently winning the popular vote (73m to 69m). A vast majority of total votes are counted so it won't go up more than another million or so from there.

Trump lost the popular vote in 2020, 81 million to 74 million.

Trump's margin in swing states is currently well over 100,000.

Trump's total vote count basically didn't change at all, but there are currently 12 MILLION people who just didn't show up to vote for democrats. Sure the electoral college was "decided" by a few hundred thousand, but this was a collosal collapse of democrat voter turnout nationwide.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

What they're saying is that 12 million more votes in States where Democrats already won wouldn't have changed a thing, it's the Democrats that didn't show up in swing States that are to blame.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

It would have won the popular vote, which many on Lemmy are far more concerned about than who wins or loses overall.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I think people are pissed that she lost the popular vote because it shows the extent of her loss and how much people didn't care in general, but the truth is she only needed the popular vote in some specific states in order to win and that's much less than the 12m votes people keep talking about.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

The election once again crushed popular Democrat talking points. Republicans can win the popular election, good turnout isn't a bad thing for Republicans, and spending more leads to winning.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

The general turnout wasn't good though, Trump didn't get as many votes as he did in the past either.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Except the swing states, which almost all had record turnout.

[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

...I think the people who voted for Trump probably played the bigger part though.

[-] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 12 points 4 days ago

not true. trump's 2020 numbers were largely the same as his 2024 numbers.

harris got 14,000,000 less votes than biden did in 2020.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

Look at swing state votes. Harris actually did better in some swing states than Trump did in 2020. And Trump beat all of Biden's 2020 swing state totals.

The rest of the votes are from states that don't matter thanks to the electoral college. You can have all the pop vote you like, doesn't matter if you don't win the EC.

So yes true, the Trump voters have everything to do with, you know, electing Trump.

[-] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago

She didn't do better in swing states tho, if that were true Trump wouldn't have won in those swing states.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

In the swing states, Harris did just about as well or better than Biden. Trump just got more, even more than Biden in 2020.

Wisconsin

Biden 2020: 1.63 million

Harris 2024: 1.667 million

Trump 2024: 1.697 million

Michigan

Biden 2020: 2.804 million

Harris 2024: 2.72 million

Trump 2024: 2.802 million

Georgia

Biden 2020: 2.473 million

Harris 2024: 2.543 million

Trump 2024: 2.66 million

Pennsylvania

Biden 2020: 3.459 million

Harris 2024: 3.352 million

Trump 2024: 3.491 million

Nevada and Arizona are taking their sweet time finishing counts but the story looks similar. 2024 Trump beats even 2020 Biden. So it's not so much that they didn't turn out for Harris, it's that more turned out for Trump.

[-] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

I would argue that this data shows that this election result is what the American people want. They either didn't mind it happening and didn't vote against it, or they actively voted for it. Democracy in action. It just kinda really sucks that this is what you guys chose.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

I was not trying to refute that Trump is what the American voters chose.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The sad truth is Biden only beat Trump because of covid and there was no pandemic this year. Biden was always a terrible candidate and it took a disease that killed a million Americans to get him elected, didnt he try like four times before this and never make it past a primary? After all that he decided to slow walk through this yeaes primaries despite critisicm, then drop out after they couldn't be ran again. Biden has A LOT of blame for this election.

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

There you go showing data that refutes popular position. Harris lost because people didn't vote for her, not that people did vote for the orange man.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

There is no fucking maybe here. You, your children, your grandkids and their kids, at least, will have, not only a conservative majority, but a fully unqualified, sycophantic trump cultist majority. Period.

America got the late stage 4 diagnosis last Tuesday. We won't spontaneously combust the next day, but we are effectively dead (as a united states) at this point- the democracy experiment was ultimately a failure. We couldn't keep the Republic.

[-] draneceusrex@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

SCOTUS appointments are the longest lasting consequences of a president being elected, and should be one of the highest considerations. But I guess the price of Doritos and a fucking squirrel won out this year.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 13 points 4 days ago

SCOTUS has been McConnell's main focus his entire career for this very reason. And, unfortunately, he's been extremely successful. It will have consequences for decades if not generations.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 31 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

In before "[liberal judge X] should have retired so Biden could have nominated their replacement". You all know damn well it would have gotten held up in the Senate because "election year". Yes, Schumer wouldn't have blocked it like McConnell and VP Harris could have broken the tie since a simple majority is all that's needed to confirm, but there was absolutely no guarantee Manchin and/or Sinema would have played ball.

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah so why bother at all, right?

Your opponent doesn't have to do anything if you don't even try.

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

as critical as i usually am of the democrat’s strategy of doing nothing, i think it was the right call here. if the appointment of a new justice did get blocked (which it very likely would have), then that would translate to yet another justice being appointed by trump. and that’s simply too big a risk to take

[-] Dhar@lemmy.ca 29 points 4 days ago

SCOTUS already green-lit Trump's ability to simply remove the undesirable justices, why wait for them to retire?

[-] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

They don’t even have to use unconventional routes to remove judges from the SCOTUS, all they have to do is impeach. ‘But, they don’t have the numbers in the Senate!’, once a few congressmen fall out windows, everyone else will rubber stamp whatever else the GOP wants, to include impeaching leftist judges and expelling leftist congressmen who don’t fall in line.

Yep. I’ll be genuinely shocked if Congress doesn’t start to look a whole fucking lot like the Duma.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

They look pretty duma to me already.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Okay, but that's the same "unconventional routes" with extra steps. What's the point of doing it indirectly instead of directly?

[-] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Total control, they can impeach every democratic judge and expel any and every democratic congressman/woman if they don’t play ball. And you still have the appearance of following the constitution.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago

I guess it will be safe to kill all of them then...

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Thanks Democratic party for being such an out of touch dog shit party. You caused this.

[-] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

They'll still blame everyone except themselves, they already are.

[-] kirbowo808@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 4 days ago

Yayyyy…… can’t wait for even more rights to be dismantled…… (not)

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
179 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19089 readers
1903 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS