74
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 43 points 2 weeks ago

the demon inhabiting mitch mcconnell would move heaven and earth to stop that judicial nomination from being approved

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

But only after making signals that he would be accepting of it so they create the opening and then say "we have a mandate from the population, we will appoint the replacement! We'd like to welcome in advance Aileen Cannon to the SCOTUS for her service in defending Donald Trump despite the actual law."

[-] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago

Giving your turn at the lathe a whirl?

[-] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

Would he though? If the new justice isn’t as liberal-leaning, even if they are bit younger I imagine he would take that deal. I mean, put yourself in the shoes of a liberal. If you could replace Clarence Thomas with a slightly more moderate republican, you would probably do that.

[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 34 points 2 weeks ago
[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 31 points 2 weeks ago

Bluesky joke

“Comply in advance” might as well be the party platform...

[-] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 29 points 2 weeks ago

This is how you stack the Supreme Court with republicans

[-] pudcollar@hexbear.net 24 points 2 weeks ago

Are they afraid of having any remaining liberal-leaning justices?

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Trump is already likely to get two more justices. Thomas and Alito could (will?) retire. And if that happens - Trump could appoint people in their 30s. Why wouldn't he do that? I guess the dems want to work as hard as they can so the court is in firm GOP control for decades.

[-] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

instead of 6-3 you can get 7-2

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago

Baby, we're looking at 9-0 by 2028 at the rate we're going.

[-] TheModerateTankie@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago

Watch Trump just expand the court.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago

Or contract it 🪓 it's legal after all!

[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago

Ok so is there really anything wrong with Sonia Sotomayor's physical or mental health?

Or is it just racism and misogyny that their party veteran insider white man gets a pass for 5 years of red flags but a Latina is told she needs to retire at age 70 after only 15 years on the Court?

[-] LanyrdSkynrd@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago

She has diabetes, but that's not a death sentence, especially when you're wealthy.

[-] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

I've been saying for about 4 years that she needs to retire so that we can replace her while Biden is still in office. Maybe she'll live to 150, but her health isn't great and the supreme Court is already really stacked.

But like everything else in the Biden admin, he dithered and waited and now it's too late

[-] Red_Sunshine_Over_Florida@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 15 points 2 weeks ago

What. The. Fuck.

[-] frauddogg@hexbear.net 6 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Barx@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

lmao they are amazing

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
74 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13551 readers
738 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS