144

spoilerMeta and Amazon are axing their diversity programmes, joining firms across corporate America that are rolling back hiring and training initiatives criticised by conservatives, citing legal and political risks.

The move comes just days after Meta Platforms, the owner of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, said it was ending a fact-checking programme criticised by President-elect Donald Trump and Republicans.

In a memo to staff about its decision, which affects, hiring, supplier and training efforts, Meta cited a "shifting legal and policy landscape".

Walmart and McDonalds are among the other companies to have made similar decisions regarding diversity efforts since Trump won re-election.

In its memo to staff, which was first reported by Axios and confirmed by the BBC, Meta - the owner of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp - cited a Supreme Court ruling concerning race in college admissions, while also noting that the term "DEI" (diversity, equity and inclusion) had become "charged".

The tech giant said it would continue to look for diverse staff, but end its current approach, which seeks to make selections from a pool of diverse candidates.

In a December memo to employees, Amazon said it was "winding down outdated programs and materials" related to representation and inclusion, aiming to complete the process by the end of 2024.

"Rather than have individual groups build programs, we are focusing on programs with proven outcomes — and we also aim to foster a more truly inclusive culture," Candi Castleberry, Amazon's VP of inclusive experiences and technology, wrote in the note which was first reported by Bloomberg on Friday.

Financial firms JPMorgan Chase and BlackRock, also pulled out of groups focused on risks from climate change this week.

The moves are a sign of the acceleration of a retreat that started two years ago, as Republicans ramped up attacks on firms such as BlackRock and Disney, accusing them of "woke" progressive activism and threatening political punishment.

Big brands such as Bud Light and Target also faced backlash and boycotts related to their efforts to appeal to LGBTQ customers.

Many of the diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives were put in place after the Black Lives Matter protests that erupted in 2020 following George Floyd's murder at the hands of police.

Recent court decisions have bolstered critics of the programmes, who said that they were discriminatory.

The Supreme Court in 2023 struck down the right for private universities to consider race in admissions decisions.

Another court of appeals ruling invalidated a Nasdaq policy that would have required companies listed on that stock exchange to have at least one woman, racial minority or LGBTQ person on their board or explain why not.

Meta said it was also ending its efforts to work with suppliers who are "diverse" but will instead focus on small and medium-sized companies.

It also plans to stop offering "equity and inclusion" training and instead offer programmes that "mitigate bias for all, no matter your background".

Meta declined to comment on the memo, news of which was immediately met with both criticism and celebration.

"I'm sitting back and enjoying every second of this," said conservative activist Robby Starbuck, who has taken credit for successfully campaigning against the policies at companies such as Ford, John Deere and Harley-Davidson.

LGBTQ advocacy group Human Rights Campaign said workplace inclusion policies help to attract and retain top staff and had been "directly tied to long-term business growth".

"Those who abandon these commitments are shirking their responsibility to their employees, consumers, and shareholders" RaShawn "Shawnie" Hawkins, the senior director of the HRC Foundation's Workplace Equality Program said.

Meta's move comes just days after the tech giant said it was ending a fact-checking programme criticised by Trump and Republicans and elevated conservatives to key leadership positions.

In a nearly three-hour interview with podcaster Joe Rogan Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg said he had always been concerned about being the arbiter of "truth" and was "ill-prepared" when the issue first heated up after the 2016 election.

He said the demands to take down information became unreasonable under the Biden administration. For example, he said the company faced pressure during the pandemic to remove content like statements about vaccine side effects.

That helped to generate a wider political backlash, he said, including his own.

"I feel like I have much greater command now of what I think the policies should be," he said, adding that he felt the US government "should be defending its companies ... not be the tip of the spear attacking".

"When the US does that to its tech industry, it's basically just open season around the rest of the world," he added.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] crime@hexbear.net 94 points 4 days ago

he felt the US government "should be defending its companies"

hey what's the marriage between state and business called again? yea

man this whole thing is terrifying, feel dumb for being so surprised but somehow it all feels sudden

[-] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 76 points 4 days ago

Yeah, none of this surprises me, but it keeps happening earlier than I expect.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 50 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Sooner that all of us expected and likely because they always wanted to but were muzzled by fake liberal inclusiveness

[-] crime@hexbear.net 11 points 3 days ago

Yeah, what's extra jarring for me is that I'm in the industry and most of my colleagues have genuinely seemed like well-meaning libs. Even when it doesn't apply to leadership, naively I'd've thought that changes like this would cause a lot of organizational turmoil because of how unpopular I'd expect the new policies to be. Guess they figured it was worth the risk.

[-] SupFBI@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago

People aren't going risk their livelihoods over this. In this economy!?

[-] crime@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago

yeah, exactly. and even if they were, Twitter miraculously not going belly up after the mass layoffs affirmed to these ghouls that other big tech companies can weather a mass exodus of employees

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 14 points 4 days ago

Class "collaboration" (in giant scare quotes) hmmmmm I truly wonder what this means again

[-] OrionsMask@hexbear.net 74 points 4 days ago

And here we see why every cracker suddenly knew what DEI was last year. Whitey already using Trump as an excuse to begin the attack on minorities that they've been planning the last few years.

[-] EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 63 points 4 days ago

Not that this isn't a bad sign, but I'm extremely skeptical that any of the DEI efforts to-date have been effective or genuine. This strikes me as more of a change in messaging than policy.

[-] AcidSmiley@hexbear.net 33 points 3 days ago

ofc they haven't been genuine. They're an incrementalist measure within the capitalist system, so they're ultimately a band aid. Doesn't mean that ripping off the band aid and rubbing the open wound with salt is better. I see all the time that it does make a direct, material difference when friends of mine are faced with transphobia in the workplace and find that HR supports them instead of telling them that we're "in a charged political climate" and them having human rights is "a controversial issue." Hiring quotas do not fix structural disadvantages either, but ofc it makes a difference when i see a job offer that claims that trans, inter and nonbinary applicants will receive preferential treatment. Does not change the fact that we're still massively more affected by unemployment, but when you're constantly between a rock and a hard place, you take what you can get.

I mean, none of that worries me as much as Zuck's willingness to immediately bend the knee, but this absolutely will change policies, precisely because DEI has always been capital performatively doing the bare minimum under public pressure. They will absolutely not just take off the DEI label and keep doing the same thing, working conditions and employment prospects for queers, women, racialized and disabled people will definitely get worse because of this.

[-] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 37 points 3 days ago

"we care about diversity"

Meanwhile the board:

flashbang

[-] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 39 points 3 days ago

While that's true, getting openly fascist isn't a good sign either

[-] Rojo27@hexbear.net 59 points 4 days ago

And here we see the cracker returning to its natural habitat, free of the shackles of diversity.

[-] dumbass@leminal.space 39 points 4 days ago

Cocaine better get cheaper if we're going back to the 80s.

[-] miz@hexbear.net 14 points 3 days ago

might have to settle for "not contaminated with fentanyl"

[-] HelluvaBottomCarter@hexbear.net 33 points 3 days ago

Turns out, if a bunch of "comedians" sit around and podcast about DEI all day, then CEOs will start changing their hiring practices.

[-] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 48 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The Western left experienced this 40 years ago when they fully bought into the post-war class collaboration with Capital under the Fordist-Keynesian social democratic model and believed this to the superior model to evil totalitarian Stalinism. Surely Capital would never betray them.

Seems like Western minorities are having to learn the same lessons all over again.

But will they ever learn?

[-] dkr567@hexbear.net 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Looks like terminally online screeching cracker are getting what they wanted, not that these corporates were ever serious about equality.

[-] ComRed2@hexbear.net 36 points 4 days ago

The yelps of a dying empire. Good riddance.

[-] miz@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago

garbage time of history

[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 38 points 4 days ago

Lmao an even worse brain drain is coming then

[-] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 36 points 4 days ago

Would be hilarious if companies said they would cease their DEI hires and just basically stopped hiring white people

[-] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 19 points 3 days ago

we will finally have big boobs in video games again pronouns

[-] happybadger@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago

I can't wait for proudly heterosexual games to return. It's disgusting that none of the newer pokemon have penises. Why even play?

[-] someone@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago

The straightest games ever are of course the ones with burly half-dressed men with rippling muscles, dominating weaker male opponents on the battlefield.

[-] happybadger@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago

That's what made pre-DEI pokemon so good. Pikachu was buff as hell, shirtless, unapologetically alpha, and you knew his penis stats.

[-] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago

Dicks out for game night

[-] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 34 points 4 days ago
[-] FeelThePower@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago

the crumbling is so apparent at this point it's insane. I really wonder how long burgerland will last.

[-] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 16 points 3 days ago

Oh no, BlackRock isnt going to do their diversity initiative anymore im so sad

[-] someone@hexbear.net 8 points 3 days ago

I have an idea for a troll bit. It would probably work best on right-wing social media. Convince some chuds that the real reason that American companies are ditching DEI policies is so that that they no longer have to hire straight white men at all to meet the corporate inclusion quotas.

[-] happybadger@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago

Like Vivek It Rhymes With Cake Ramaswamy said, white Americans just lack the sophistication to compete. They enjoy the wrong 1990s sitcom characters and their parents don't raise them properly. shrug-outta-hecks

this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
144 points (100.0% liked)

news

23683 readers
882 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS