161
submitted 4 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] deadkennedy@lemm.ee 29 points 4 months ago

Lost.

Not saved. Lost. Elon and the Musketeers lost this nation half a trillion dollars.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago
[-] Paul_1958@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago

And don't forget the 10 trillion in lost war plane sales due to "toning them down in case our allies turn on us', just like he has turned on Canada and Europe.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 months ago

You're spinning it wrong. "With the doge cuts, we saved you half a trillion dollars in taxes"

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

…that’s not what happened.

This is like a fuck off huge gas turbine generator spinning at full chat and then just starting to take parts off of it and snipping fluid lines. One of the features of turbines is that they will continue to run for a bit even when they’re heading in the direction of catastrophic failure, since it’s all angular momentum and no reciprocation. But it IS going to catastrophically fail.

This is the system just eating itself and money being - at best - siphoned into someone’s pockets, or more likely, just being outright wasted. The USAID cuts, for instance, basically locked an absolute shitload of consumables and perishables in warehouses to spoil. That’s what we’re talking about. And that’s only the most obvious example.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

Another 4 months and they could have lost enough to forgive all student loans. :/

[-] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Trump did say he's only just getting started.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

Well April 2nd is our supposed "national day of prosperity". Which analysts think means he is going to enact global tariffs as well as all the retaliatory tariffs he is planning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 22 points 4 months ago

I think we should organize and go demand everyone working for DOGE... stop. And not demand like with funny signs and chants, but like with 2nd amendment arms.

[-] Australis13@fedia.io 18 points 4 months ago

It should be blatantly obvious to anyone paying attention that the "Department of Government Efficiency" isn't really about efficiency.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 months ago

Just like the "ministry of truth" isn't about the truth.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 months ago

And now the "environmental protection agency" is about extracting profit at the expense of the environment

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

Environmental Plundering Agency

[-] theterrasque@infosec.pub 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's the TSA of efficiency

[-] elvith@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago

Remember, they're talking about efficiency all day long, but they're not mentioning effectivity with a single word.

Efficiency is how fast/cheap/ressource-less you can get something done. Effectivity is if you're even doing the right thing at all.

You can be super efficient, but still not be effective by doing something, so....

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I mean we can just say they aren't about efficiency because they don't research anything before they start making cuts it's simply I don't like USAID let's gut it, I don't like the SSA so let's gut it.

They know what they're doing even if Trump somehow gets the boot we're looking at probably 50 years or more to get back our world position if they don't fuck our economy up so badly it's effectively impossible to comeback.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Effectivity is if you’re even doing the right thing at all.

Not exactly. It's more about whether or not you've accomplished the thing you set out to do, irrespective of resources and irrespective of "right" or "wrong".

So in this case, if DOGE's actual goal is the dismantling of the administrative state (literally spelled out in Project 2025), then I would say that they've been very effective.

They don't seem to care about the efficiency aspect.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 17 points 4 months ago

Wait till you see how much we loose from killing the Department of Education. Education is like the easiest ROI

[-] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

It's not the quickest though. ROI timeline is 18 years minimum for tax from non-degree level jobs, 22/23 years for degree level, and 26 to 30 years for post doctoral.

It's sad. The quarterly pressure to generate value is one of the worst economic forces of capitalism which drives enshitification, job-instability from the "fire bottom performing 10%" so that you can post more "profits" from cost cutting, and the general short-term thinking that pervades all aspects of the culture.

It's the reason "nobody" builds things to last or metaphorically plants something now for the future: it's not profitable quick enough.

[-] Kage520@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Totally agree. Was talking to my brother who worked for the US Corps of Engineers. He said they have a decades long outlook for their projects. So if they want to remove a dam or something, studies are done to make sure that is the smartest move not just for the next few years, but the next several decades.

So refreshing vs the typical "new CEO wants to fire x% of the workforce to generate 1% more profit this year (ignore the fact that customers will leave when it's that much shittier here... That's next year's (and next Ceo's) problem)".

[-] myrrh@ttrpg.network 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] piecat@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Just like in corporate america, the savings hit this quarter so bonuses all around. Then the CEO jumps ship and it's someone else's problem next quarter.

[-] CircaV@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago

Oh so sad. Elect a clown expect a circus.

Install an unelected billionaire, expect theft.

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

MAGA/DOGE were bragging about getting like 100 billion dollars over ten years from tariffs while the US gains ~1.5 trillion dollars every year in income tax revenue.

Everything is bad right now.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Not for the rich, but that was the plan all along

[-] Letsdothisok@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

I think DOGE should send out stimulas checks because of all the money that is going to be saved.

[-] rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 months ago

This would be more than reasonable if they were actually doing what they said.

In real life, they're costing the US an insane amount of money, and working class taxpayers will carry the burden of paying for it as usual.

It could easily set a new record for largest transfer of wealth from the workers to the rich in human history.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PedroMaldonado@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

From what I hear.....elon, thief and their cronies are specifically wrecking government to push a corporate takeover...jeeze. it's like robocop.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

And/or destabilizing the country's economy and political power worldwide so our enemies like Russia can do whatever they want without the US interfering. The complete destruction of US soft power via things like USAID and the blatant attempts to destroy any collaboration with our allies seems to point more in that direction.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Different groups, different motivations, but they're headed in the same direction more or less so they're working together. Trump is working to install himself as a dictator under orders from Putin. He wants to be for the US what Lukashenko is for Belarus. Ultimately he'll be Putin's puppet but he'll largely have free reign within the US which is the only thing he cares about. He's destroying all the US soft power and doing everything he can to turn all the US allies against it. Domestically he's painting targets on the backs of as many minorities as he can in order to keep the useful idiots that elected him distracted.

Musk meanwhile is working to establish an oligarchy and to steal or destroy as much of the US government as he can manage. Ultimately his goals are fairly transparent as he's motivated entirely by naked greed. Since his efforts hurt US foreign relations as much as the domestic situation he's a useful tool to Trump in his efforts to neuter the US for Putin.

Then you've got the Christian nationalists in the GOP that don't really care about what's going on as long as they're allowed to trample all over the first amendment and declare Christianity as the official US religion with all the associated bigotry and discrimination. Since that plays to Trump's efforts to distract his supporters he's perfectly fine with it, but likely keeping a close eye on that group lest any of them think about usurping his crown, particularly when he still hasn't really gotten to go full dictator yet.

[-] krebssteven@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I would disagree on your Musk-analysis. He and the other techbros are not after the money but after the power and influence that being in these positions nets them. The monetary gain is a side-effect. The goal is to enforce their unrealistic ideas about how to reshape society. Look up ‘Longtermism’ and the ridiculous ideas of one Curtis Yarvin. Remember MAGAts are fond of yammering about the World Economic Forum and the Gates, Soros etc? How these are supposedly trying to reshape society into some big brother-esque dystopia?

That is what the tech-oligarchs are facilitating.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

The stupid "doge" thing was never about balancing the budget anyway. That's all bullshit red meat for the dumbasses that voted for donvict.

[-] oyo@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Imagine being so fucking dumb you use IRS data to go after immigrants who are paying taxes, thus ensuring no immigrant ever pays taxes again.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

You gotta give it to Elmo, few people would have been able to pull off that feat. I mean, losing that much money takes hard work and dedication, and I'm not even kidding hete. It actually takes a certain skill set (extreme incompetency combined with an unending unearned confidence) to be able to lose that much money that quickly. I was impressed with the money he lost from Twitter, but that's peanuts now, that's a rounding error in comparison to what he's losing the US now.

[-] smeenz@lemmy.nz 2 points 4 months ago

Hey now, let's not demean little Donny two-scoops, who has an almost equally well honed ability to lose money where it should be impossible.

[-] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

That money isn't lost, I think we all know who's going to divvy it up when all is said and done.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Making big losses attracts investors. - Elon Musk

[-] Elkot@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Anyone checked behind the couch cushions?

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago
[-] Elkot@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Dare I ask what you mean by that?

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Vance the couch fucker.

There was a claim that, in the first draft of his book, Vance recounted a teenage sexual encounter with a couch. In great detail.

This claim came with an image of the text, which is easily found if you want that sort of thing.

The truthfulness of the claim has been questioned, but Vance just seems like the kind of guy who would fuck a couch.

[-] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 months ago

The truthfulness of the claim has been questioned, but Vance just seems like the kind of guy who would fuck a couch

But not the truthiness of the claim, which I think is the more important part.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

you might find things other than loose change behind the cushions when there's a couchfucker on the loose.

[-] sporkler@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

you write a book that gets turned into a movie, help draft the most optimistic plan for turning a reasonable functional democracy into a dictatorship, rock eyeliner at least as well as any 80's glam-rock start, but you fuck one* couch, and that's all you're remembered for.

  • well, you know, the ones in the furniture store didn't count, and the futon was technically a futon, and I was genuinely concerned that I'd be maimed by the recliner, and when I was drunk didn't count, and beanbag chairs are barely even a chair...
[-] courageousstep@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

The article doesn’t explain how, where the money went, or how the IRS knows this.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Cutting staff thereby reducing the IRS's ability to find and go after wealthy tax cheats.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
161 points (99.4% liked)

politics

25033 readers
809 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS