171

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is one of many rallies in Iran in support of the government and the leadership.


short summary here, longish summary in spoiler tags below: Western standoff munition stockpiles now substantially depleted, therefore Western aircraft activity directly over Iran increasing (as is footage of attempted and actual hits against them) as the US attempts to transition more to using bombs dropped directly onto targets, Iran is increasingly in the driver's seat and controlling the conflict, world economy is fucked and yet could still get much worse very soon, if you require a car to live (especially if it's not electric) and cannot work from home then you have my sincere condolences

longish summary hereWhile I've seen several estimates on the current stockpiles of US and Zionist missiles and interceptors - somewhere in the realm of a third depleted, perhaps even up to half - it seems like we're reaching the point at which the US does not want to commit even more standoff munitions and is trying their luck against the Iranian air defense network directly.

We have already seen footage of Iran attempting to shoot down, and sometimes actually striking Western fifth generation planes like the F-35, and more footage along those lines is appearing for other plane models (with one side claiming that they evaded interception and the other claiming they hit it, etc etc, propaganda is everywhere, you know the drill). How much the US is willing to test their planes against Iranian air defense is a matter of debate. Strictly speaking, a few fighter jets and bombers shot down would be no catastrophic loss in the grand scheme of things, as the US has hundreds. However, the narrative of such a thing would be quite bad for the US - "You're telling me an OBLITERATED Iranian military can shoot down some of our most advanced equipment?? What are we gonna do against China?!" - and given Trump's deranged jingoistic rhetoric aimed to buoy markets, it's clear that he cares very deeply about narratives. Additionally, with Chinese exports of several critical metals to the US banned, the prospect of replacing these aircraft (and indeed the standoff munitions and the interceptors and the ground radars etc) is looking questionable.

All the while, Iran continues its strikes across the Middle East. Missile and drone strikes are reportedly on the uptick again, demonstrating that Iranian military capabilities have by no means been "destroyed" as Western propaganda claim, though it's impossible to sure there was ever a significant downtick due to Western censorship and outright fabrications. People around the world are gradually realizing the magnitude of the economic disaster that is occurring and may yet occur. Refineries and factories which deal with oil and gas directly are starting to slow down or stop production, and those who make products downstream of those are starting to follow them like dominoes. Outrage at gas station prices is rising, and many countries are considering limiting civilian driving and implementing work-from-home policies akin to the coronavirus pandemic. And now, threats are being made by Trump against both Kharg Island (where most Iranian oil is shipped from) and the Iranian electrical grid - which is highly decentralized and would require a prolonged bombing campaign to completely take out -and the promised Iranian reprisal would be apocalyptic to the Middle East. It would make oil prices rise to previously unfathomable heights as oil infrastructure turned off and remained off for months, perhaps years, and set in motion one of the world's greatest humanitarian catastrophes as the desalination necessary for tens of millions of people is shut down. It would also not be a symmetrical problem, as Iran does not rely on desalination for its water supply.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists' destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 77 points 5 days ago

Is the marines group that's being sent to Iran the same group that kidnapped Maduro?

If yes, theory: They're being sent as a threat to the new leadership ahead of upcoming attempts to talk down the war. Or they intend a kidnap operation to gain leverage in talks.

[-] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 60 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

No, not the same ARG for the Marines. The USS Tripoli is days away from Iran, and the USS Boxer almost a month away. The USS Iwo Jima was the one near Venezuela. The USS Tripoli is rather unique as an LHD/LHA, it lacks a well deck and has bigger hangars for aircraft, making it more suitable to either act as a mini aircraft carrier with over 20x F-35Bs, or to load up a large number of tilt rotor aircraft and helicopters for an "airborne amphibious" assault.

There's no need to kidnap Iranian leadership when the US and Israel can kill them, and have done so. The distances involved are much bigger than Venezuela, you'd need to use tilt rotor aircraft most likely, or provide helicopters with aerial refuelling deep inside Iranian territory.

As for 160th SOAR and Delta force who kidnapped Maduro, they're most likely already there, they were in the UK in January. But any mission deep into Iranian territory would likely make use of the CV-22B Osprey tilt rotor aircraft operated by the US AFSOC(Air Force Special Operations Command), instead of the modified Chinhooks and and Black Hawk helicopters of 160th SOAR. Because of this reason:

Tilt rotor aircraft would fly much further on a single tank of fuel. But any operation deep inside Iran to say extract nuclear materials is going to require excavation, it's not something that can be done in a few hours at night. Multi day or multi week operation. Which is going to need supplies forward loaded, or resupply. Which would be very complicated. The MC-130J Commando II can do this resupply, and mid air refueling of helicopters and tilt rotor aircraft. It can even help set up temporary airfields inside Iran. But now that requires flying a slow fixed wing aircraft deep inside Iran. Even if it's designed for this, very risky mission.

Even though this has been on the cards since January, I still can't believe it's actually real. Like the US actually might do this. Could easily be an operation eagle claw 2.0. There is so much risk involved, this isn't just bombing with aircraft.

[-] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 35 points 5 days ago

helicopters with aerial refuelling deep inside Iranian territory

seen-this-one

[-] joaomarrom@hexbear.net 34 points 5 days ago

any mission deep into Iranian territory would likely make use of the CV-22B Osprey tilt rotor aircraft operated by the US AFSOC

Oh so they're just going to try to kill Iranian leadership again, but this time by crashing a bunch of Ospreys instead of wasting perfectly good JASSMs

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 30 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Ok so it's probably not a kidnap op then or they'd be sending in the kidnap specialists.

What do you think is happening? What are this marines being sent in primarily good at? There's not that many of them so it has to be some small scale operation right?

I want to hear marmite speculate

[-] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 33 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

https://hexbear.net/comment/7037416

It's not just Marines, a whole bunch of units are being sent. 82 Airborne is the big one, maybe Rangers, Seal Team Six/DEVGRU, etc. Lots of high tier units seeing potential movement. The "kidnap specialists" in 160th SOAR and Delta force are probably already there too.

Also the US cannot leave Iran with 60% enriched uranium after this war from a US perspective. If they do this, Iran will weaponise it, it's the logical option from Iran's perspective. So the US will either try a deal or a military operation to seize it. Lots of MC-130J Commando II movement in the UK and the Middle East, because any operation to seize the nuclear materials will require time, maybe weeks, and supplies, resupply, excavation equipment, etc.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 44 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Deploying just 5000 troops onto an excavation site that could take weeks to excavate that's only 50 miles outside of Tehran seems like the stupidest possible thing they could do.

This site couldn't be anywhere more dangerous in the entire country.

EDIT: If they can't secure any military bases anywhere in the middle east hundreds and hundreds of miles OUTSIDE of Iran how the fuck are they going to operate in a fixed location performing an excavation for several weeks?????????

[-] jack@hexbear.net 37 points 5 days ago

If they can't secure any military bases anywhere in the middle east hundreds and hundreds of miles OUTSIDE of Iran how the fuck are they going to operate in a fixed location performing an excavation for several weeks?????????

By untying the hands of warfighters to act with maximum lethality and minimum legality - it's not woke warfare by backstabbing politicians, but a president who has the will to exact unlimited force on the enemies of America

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 36 points 5 days ago

Ok Hegseth's ai speech writer but how are they gonna not get hit by drones lmao

[-] CriticalXipport@hexbear.net 24 points 5 days ago
[-] Pentacat@hexbear.net 21 points 5 days ago

Warfighters getting turned into maximum pink mist.

[-] jack@hexbear.net 13 points 5 days ago

Huh, never thought about that part

[-] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 28 points 5 days ago

82 Airborne is the big one

Are they actually a competent division, or are they just coasting off of prestige from WW2?

[-] Tervell@hexbear.net 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

They could be an entire division of John Wicks, but the simple material reality is that they're light infantry - they don't have tanks or any other armored vehicles. They once had the M551 Sheridan, but those have long since been retired. They were going to adopt the M10 Booker, but that program got cancelled (although I think the few dozen vehicles that were produced are technically still in inventory, but whether they'd get used in a real conflict or not is not known). Back in the Gulf War they borrowed some LAV-25s from the Marines, so that's something they could get at least, but either way, with all these vehicles, they couldn't actually get brought into combat until they've already secured an airstrip for planes carrying them to land - unlike the Russian VDV, they don't have vehicles that can be airdropped, or are at least small enough to be transported by helicopter rather than plane (which would be able to land outside of specially-designated airstrips) like the Germans

Best thing they could do is some LAV-25s by helicopter winch

Their most recent successful adoption of a vehicle is... the ISV, one that not only is completely unarmored, but is completely open to the point of not even having a roof. An artillery shell landing in your general vicinity is enough to shred you with shrapnel in one of these


This is the classic problem facing airborne forces - it's really cool that they can deploy very flexibly, but they just don't have staying power. They're only really viable when regular ground forces follow through very promptly - the Airborne operations for D-Day worked because they only had to hold some select positions for a short while before the regular infantry came in, and the air-force had done a thorough job delaying German reinforcements, while the ones in Market Garden conversely failed because the armored forces were delayed, and the paratroopers just got rolled up by the Germans. The Germans themselves had a disastrous, albeit eventually successful, airborne operation early in the war, which led to them swearing off paradrops for the remaining duration.

[-] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 15 points 5 days ago

It looks like my old Honda Civic would've provided more protection than this. Yikes.

This is the classic problem facing airborne forces

And I remember the Soviets having a similar problem, trying to deploy glider tanks with their airborne divisions, but any tank heavy enough to be useful on the battlefield was also too heavy for the suspension to handle the landing, but any tank able to handle the landing didn't have the armour needed to actually be useful, so they also abandoned the project.

Thanks for this write up, it was very informative!

[-] Seasonal_Peace@hexbear.net 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The German vehicle drives all enemies away simply through its incredibly intimidating presence. They really made a Wunderwaffe.

[-] ComradeKingfisher@hexbear.net 20 points 5 days ago

They're like the Marines in that they coast off prestige; are extremely arrogant with nothing to back it up; are entirely unnecessary and should be dismantled; and leadership is a concentrated caustic cesspool of machismo running entirely on kool-aid.

[-] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

All the forces listed for are are either light infantry or special operations forces. It's not like the US is planning to send in the tanks.

Technically a C-17 could transport some Abrams tanks and Bradley IFVs, but it'll need to land and offload.

[-] juniper@hexbear.net 25 points 5 days ago

Has anyone gamed out whether their idea could be to do the minimal work necessary to turn the material into a dirty bomb? Claim as part of some recovery mission Iran's "nuclear weapons" buried underground were accidentally set off? They get the chance to spread fallout to Tehran while maintaining narrative cover that patriotic Americans died trying to save the Iranians from themselves, at least for Western rubes? I think I'm too blackpilled at this point.

[-] RandallThymes@hexbear.net 28 points 5 days ago

This is literally the plot of Call of Duty 4 surely that cannot be manifested into reality

[-] NPa@hexbear.net 5 points 5 days ago

trump-anguish Barron I need you to infodump about that Call of Dooby game again, we need new war plans

[-] Enjoyer_of_Games@hexbear.net 24 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Eagle Claw 2 ft. notoriously reliable aircraft the Osprey timmy-pray

[-] Hestia@hexbear.net 20 points 5 days ago

Imagine if the US deployed the military just to excavate the place for Iran

[-] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 35 points 5 days ago

Has the group used in Venezeula even been identified yet? Looked very briefly but couldn't find anything.

[-] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 27 points 5 days ago

It was 160th SOAR with the helicopters. They brought Delta force in and out.

[-] Poutine@hexbear.net 8 points 5 days ago

I wonder if they're called Delta Force because they're used for regime change. (∆)

[-] Boise_Idaho@hexbear.net 4 points 5 days ago

Jeez, it really would be something stupid like that.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 25 points 5 days ago
[-] darkcalling@hexbear.net 25 points 5 days ago

I wouldn't be shocked given this started with the murder of children if they didn't abduct family members of leadership and threaten them with being thrown into the darkest US prison on bullshit charges or just put in Gitmo as it's right there and there's nothing to stop them from using it AFAIK for whatever they want as long as victims aren't US citizens.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 24 points 5 days ago

Is Cuba allowing gitmo to have fuel to power it right now?

[-] jack@hexbear.net 28 points 5 days ago
[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 14 points 5 days ago
[-] ComradeKingfisher@hexbear.net 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

https://www.same.org/tmearticle/energy-self-sufficiency-at-guantanamo-bay/

For the last several decades, Guantanamo Bay generated its primary power through a mix of 15 diesel generators of various capacity ratings, including Mobile Utility Support Equipment; four 950-kW wind turbines; and a limited utility-grade solar photovoltaic system to meet peak electrical power requirements. Since the turn of the century, however, the focus has shifted from these legacy systems toward finding a cleaner, more reliable, and more affordable, energy future.

The end of FY2023 held great significance for NAVFAC Southeast as it marked the successful culmination of a four-year energy savings performance contract (ESPC), awarded in July 2019, that aimed to achieve the milestone of constructing the Defense Department’s first combined cycle power plant fueled by natural gas. . . . Additionally, to bolster the base’s electrical power resilience, a 12-MW photovoltaic system, complemented by a Battery Energy Storage System, was integrated. As added redundancy, Naval Station Guantanamo Bay retained its existing diesel power plant generators to furnish electricity during outages or to augment power during surge events.

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 12 points 5 days ago

A total of 17 percent of the power generated by the new plant uses renewable sources of energy.

So they aren't self-sufficient. They're dependent on diesel imports, that may or may not be blocked given the embassy is being blocked.

[-] RedDawn@hexbear.net 17 points 5 days ago

It’s a naval base, who is stopping a ship from docking with fuel there? The US isn’t blocking themselves.

[-] RedDawn@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago

I don’t think Cuba is able or willing to stop the US from docking ships at the naval base in Guantanamo.

this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
171 points (99.4% liked)

news

24691 readers
849 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS