128
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yoink@hexbear.net 57 points 5 months ago

i saw this tweet yesterday and as a game dev and designer it legit made me mad

it's the same shit AI bros do every time - they have to dumb down the meaning of the thing they're trying to imitate poorly, because they have to shift the goal posts to pretend that what they do has any legitimacy

this is in no way a game engine, and trying to pretend it is requires abstracting and dumbing down entire fields of study these nerds have never even dipped their toes into

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 35 points 5 months ago

I think they're aware of how absurd their claims are, but they think that the most important thing is the "potential" for this technology to generalize and eventually come to achieve what they're promising now. The issue is they'd essentially need AGI to take it from this to a real game engine, and that's obviously not happening.

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 5 months ago

Yep. Like any good grift, it isn't about what it can actually do, but what it could hypothetically do if enough people "invest" in it.

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
128 points (99.2% liked)

chapotraphouse

13672 readers
893 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS