191
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] godlessworm@hexbear.net 73 points 2 days ago

isnt it fucked up how all of america’s propaganda is 100% reliant on taking advantage of how uninformed americans are?

their nuclear ENERGY program. iran has a nuclear ENERGY program, not a nuclear weapons program. your average person doesn’t know the difference and these ‘people’ bank on that

[-] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 64 points 2 days ago

We're not at war with Iran, we're merely bombing critical energy infrastructure with some of the largest conventional bombs ever made... Can't you tell the difference?

[-] Hestia@hexbear.net 16 points 2 days ago

Um, technically we’re not at war because the president can only do what he wants for up to 100 days and THEN he needs to get congressional approval

-my stepdad

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"Hey stepdad just letting you know I've made a policy change, if I punch you in the dick as hard as I can you have to wait one calendar week before you can call it a fistfight and punch back"

[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 44 points 2 days ago

So if 9/11 had just targeted the pentagon and the white house, it would have been fine, right?

[-] Palacegalleryratio@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

Would have been an amazing move if al-Quadia claimed the attack and signed off with “now is the time for peace”

[-] Palacegalleryratio@hexbear.net 47 points 2 days ago

It’s not a war it’s an unprovoked special military operation, which we’ve now decided is good actually

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 22 points 2 days ago

The rules-based international order strikes again!

[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

us-foreign-policy {Unprovoked|Preemptive}

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 37 points 2 days ago

I'm not punching you, I'm merely punching your face. Totally different!

[-] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 24 points 2 days ago

Fuck, we're using the "And, you know, there is no such thing as society. There are individual men and women, and there are families." logic for wars now, huh? sadness-abysmal

[-] loomy@lemy.lol 21 points 2 days ago

thank god, for I minute there I was concerned.

[-] Civility@hexbear.net 18 points 2 days ago
[-] tombruzzo@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago

I don't think it's eye shadow. I think his eyelids are super folded over, like some kind of excess eye foreskin

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago

Squidgy dough boi Vance

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago

Using my "death ray 9000" on you is not an act of war

[-] MizuTama@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago

The cushions are soft and lush, while the couch itself is filled with hard and painful materials; the cushions lack wood and the splinters that accompany it. The couch still exists without the plush nature of the cushions, and the cushions exist without the stiff and rigid nature of the couch's structure. But this rigidness is required for the full pleasure of the cushions to be realized. The cushions alone are not enough for the boundless pleasure that fucking them brings. The couch is not only a philosophical necessity, but a material one as well.

-This post is brought to you by Morning Vodka and Couch Fuckers Anoynomous.

[-] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

OK, I know it is probably mean to ask, but did Vance get some kind of botched plastic surgery or something in the past? There's no way his face just looks like that naturally, right? He looks like a guy in a mask, like the scooby doo gang is about to trap him and reveal it was actually old man withers or something.

this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
191 points (100.0% liked)

news

24134 readers
834 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS