350
Real Talk (mander.xyz)
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Usernamealreadyinuse@lemmy.world 19 points 7 hours ago
[-] Eq0@literature.cafe 102 points 12 hours ago

Once, I got a reviewer stating “in the code, I doubt line 43 was supposed to be submitted”

Line 43: FUUUCK, DOES NOT WORK

[-] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 52 points 11 hours ago

I'm amazed a reviewer read the code.

[-] Eq0@literature.cafe 24 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Me too! That wasn’t even the only time I got comments on my code. Since then, I make a point of doing at least a cursory check on codes when I review as well

[-] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

Do you also embed little easter eggs to reward those diligent code-reviewers?

[-] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 3 points 6 hours ago

ASCII art in the comments

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 19 points 11 hours ago
[-] Eq0@literature.cafe 22 points 11 hours ago

Yes. Yes, everything works a-okay. Somehow I fixed the code but never removed the obnoxious, full cap comment…

[-] Sergio@piefed.social 38 points 11 hours ago

Best case scenario:

  • The initial submission didn't cite the crappy Gabor paper, and peer reviewers said that it should.
  • The peer editor, summarizing feedback, said that the submission was accepted as long as it took into account the peer reviewer suggested revisions.
  • The submitters don't really care about the paper quality, all they need is the citation. So they assigned the revisions to the lowliest grad student.
  • The lowliest grad student knows their advisor hates that crapmaster Gabor, so when they sent it to their advisor they asked whether they should cite that paper, thinking they might prefer to passive-aggressively "forget" to do so
  • The advisor doesn't care about the paper quality (see above) so they just skimmed it and saw the word "Gabor". (alternate hypothesis: they thought this was a great opportunity to troll that crap-merchant Gabor, as well as those useless middlemen thieves at Wiley.)
  • The peer editor: same as the advisor, they're just doing this for a line-item on their CV.
  • The Wiley "editor" doesn't even read the paper, they just forward it to the typesetter subcontractors and demand that the submitters pay up.
  • The typesetter subcontractors don't care, it's all just text to them.
  • And so it becomes Science, and the writer of crappy papers Gabor is enshrined in the pantheon along with Ea-Nasir and William "I'm something of a scientist myself" Dafoe. Immortality, of a sorts.
[-] Microw@piefed.zip 19 points 7 hours ago

Worst case scenario:

The peer reviewer is Gabor.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 14 points 7 hours ago

Best Case Scenario:

Gabor agrees the paper was crap

[-] Maturin@hexbear.net 1 points 4 hours ago

Your comment combined with Zote’s made for an excellent synthesis.

[-] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 hours ago

If your reviewer suggests you cite another paper, it's one of their papers and they just doxed themselves, 100% of the time.

[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 57 points 12 hours ago

That’s why you always prefix your todos with “TODO”

[-] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

Only in Kansas

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 7 hours ago

To-do: add TODO

[-] Contramuffin@lemmy.world 20 points 11 hours ago

That's why you change the color of any temporary text so that you can really see if there's any left

[-] Eq0@literature.cafe 13 points 11 hours ago

Considering how widespread of a situation it is, I am surprised I haven’t found yet a good LaTeX package that handles temporary sections

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago

You don't need a package at all. I just define a new command \xxx{stuff} that changes the colour to red. It's a one-liner. Copy and paste that into any new document. Changing the colour without a custom command is equally trivial, but this allows you to search for "xxx" to find anything you might've missed.

[-] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 9 hours ago

why not add notes as marginalia?

[-] Zwiebel@feddit.org 3 points 10 hours ago

####I throw some hashes in front

[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

At least it wasn't AI

[-] Postimo@lemmy.zip 0 points 12 hours ago

Vibes science?

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
350 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16334 readers
2435 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS