196
Love this honestly. Gonna be so much fash on fash violence you won't even believe
Obviously I don't really care about our military installations being secure and all that because I hate America and our armed service, but this is fucking idiotic.
I have a lot of friends who are veterans (anti-war vets, tbc). There's a reason servicemen aren't allowed to just carry guns all over the place and military installations are guarded by armed military police. Armymen (and women) are fucking psychos. When they aren't drunk they're strung out on coke, they have the attitude of fratboys trained to kill and worshipped by their entire country. The only thing keeping the average military base from devolving into a shooting gallery is the fact that the only people with guns on premises are on-duty MPs.
P.S., this is one step closer to my personal wish-list: Trump passing an Executive Order guaranteeing the right of people to bear arms at work.
Not only that, but having to check out a gun and report why is going to stop a lot of people to shoot themselves out. Expect a significant rise of suicide inside military bases
Hell yeah I hope so.
Expect a significant rise of suicide inside military bases
It's already particularly bad at recruit training. Basically every unit has at least one person try it in the first couple of weeks.
RIP to literally everyone stationed at Fort Bragg
God really did send these bozos to end American hegemony huh?
Oh yeah! I forgot a bunch of the cabinet and VP etc are all living on US bases now.
Countdown to gang gun fights on a US base? Is this on polymarket yet?
The American gang grafitti found in Iraq during the occupation is one of the most disquieting things I've ever read about. We really do export violence.
Lol. Fuck yeah. Something extremely cool is going to happen
Bring your 
to work day. Every day.
american soldiers will now have the opportunity to do some of the funniest shit ever
Excellent idea Mr. Secretary, let the psychos rip each other apart
Yes. Sickos stay winning. Fuck yes.
Hell yeah, PvP zone
One you lathed this!
All this focus on individuality is definitely what you want in your military
lmao this is so stupid. what problem is this supposed to solve? not enough freedom for our warfighters?
Do this then institute a draft.
I've shared a few times about this. A string of unrelated murders around my barracks happened before I left. All of them were because people were drunk. There's going to be weekly shoot outs on every base in the country. Fucking insane.
Unlimited blue on blue fire onthe Yankee terrorists
load more comments
(3 replies)
operation first part of full meta jacket
hell yeah
incoming yankkkee wehrmacht mass shootings let's fucking go!
lol, I'm not sure what this is supposed to solve but I see two cases
- Domestic/"safe" bases: Aren't (at least effectively) all killings already done by military personnel? Won't this just make things worse?
- Warzone bases: What are they supposed to do, skeet shoot the incoming drones?
Security Blanket Fire
Domestic/"safe" bases: Aren't (at least effectively) all killings already done by military personnel? Won't this just make things worse?
But if something bad happens I will have MY gun to protect ME so in fact it will have improved the situation infinitely.
It says on the article in the OP that the memorandum applies specifically to "DOW property within the United States", so it would be case 1.
I archived the article because the article is on a US Government website. I don't want to link directly to a US Government website because then the US government could record Hexbear users who click the article by http referer headers.
Thanks, I didn't realize the archive link had additional info 
"Confirming your God-given right to self-protection is what I am signing into action today, and I'm proud to do so," the secretary concluded, just before signing the memo.
Getting dangerously close to begging for some pro-fragging Catch-22 logic here.
Holy fuck that's even better, specifically a risk to Americans, not even overseas bases. Someone in this thread mentioned that American politicians are moving onto bases for "security" so things could get very ""tragic"".
I wonder what the odds are that the brain genius thinks this will make the soldiers more capable of protecting them, thus making them safer? One thing I've noticed is that more and more high ranking assholes actually believe their own bullshit, unironically and in full. Wonder what the officials moving on to bases for security think of this? Because that too could be very funny. JD Vance moved onto a base, right? Someone interview JD Vance.
Puttin' bets on Stephen Miller getting shot. Who wants in?
Maybe it wasn't JDPON Don, it was Hoxaist Hegseth all along.
Please merciful Allah swt bless me with at least one headline describing an officer fragging committed by a fresh recruit in bootcamp. If heaven wills it Full Metal Jacket will become reality
Stephen Miller lives on a military base. Who else from the cabinet does?
Rubio too I think
We need a sicko-yes-hiding-behind-wall-of-sandbags emoji for this one
load more comments
(1 replies)
Hegseth genuinely seems to believe these rules only exist because of woke and not because they were written in blood. What an idiot.
Dishonorable discharge
Accidental dischargeAny sites taking bets when the first military base mass shooting is gonna be?
They really did this because they're bored? This feels like corporate slop just to let someone's resume say they did something. Did someone actually die from something a gun could have prevented? They've government property, why do they need priveliges?
This has been the kind of thing that conservative uncles have been facebook posting since the Fort Hood Shooting in 2009. The notion is that the shooter would have killed fewer people if the army hadn't "gone woke and left our brave warriors utterly defenceless against the forces of evil" or some shit like that.
Fantastic I support this!
I thought when you joined the military they made you leave all your possessions at home and they shaved your hair and put you in a uniform so that you would surrender your identity.
What the fuck possible justification is there for this. I do not accept the premise that military bases are soft targets.
I agree Pete Hegseth, these snowflakes made fragging their commanding officer too hard!
Now they can customize their own firearm of choice for the job. 
brrat brrat brrat
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
196 points (99.0% liked)
news
24727 readers
483 users here now
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS