162
submitted 3 months ago by pppp1000@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Frank@hexbear.net 57 points 3 months ago

"shelters" are one of the darkest and most pernicious propaganda lies in the US right now. "Shelters" my right testicle.

[-] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 31 points 3 months ago

They built 50 sheds with a sleeping cot that can be occupied for a month before they're required to leave, what more do you want?

[-] roux@hexbear.net 24 points 3 months ago

It cost money to stay at our local shelter last I heard.

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 25 points 3 months ago

Yeah, many of them cost 20+ a night and the beds are so limited you have to line up hours before hand to even have a chance of getting in. And then when you do get in you have to deal with violent staff, cops, extremely restrictive rules, theft, and often bedbugs.

[-] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 17 points 3 months ago

WTF shelters cost money? For 20 a night, save up and just get a motel room honestly, not that much more and you don't have to deal with shelter BS. I would be sleeping in my car 5 nights a week and getting a motel 2 nights a week rather than spending money to go to a shitty place like that.

[-] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah, I didn't know that either...

jesus-christ

Ed. One of the shelters near me is 'faith based' (better love jesus), and need you to have been homeless for 6+ months before using...this is actually demonic shit though, charge the most vulnerable money they don't have, or force them to adopt your religion

I wanna fedposting

[-] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago

How do they expect you to prove you have been homeless for 6 months? And what's the point of that? We need people to have experienced enough suffering so they will fall for our indoctrination?

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 8 points 3 months ago

I didn't have a car so I just slept outside and then got a motel room 2 days a week the first time I was homeless. Definitely the shelters are a problem that I didn't want to deal with and couldn't get into if I wanted to most of the time.

But also the motel costs were still like $35 a night and generally was only possible because I still had a job.

Being homeless is so costly and so stressful.

[-] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago

I can't imagine being homeless, and I especially can't imagine doing it without a car. That's my one fallback right now that at least feels a bit better, although car sleeping laws are still existent and stupid. But being in the streets right now, especially with the current crackdown on homeless in CA and your belongings just being open for the taking by police at a moments notice. Like how the fuck do we expect people to live

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah, 3 times over the last decade but mostly in a row cause it's hard to claw your way back up. I found a storage unit was nice the second time cause as long as I knew I could only take a couple hour naps during the day all my stuff was at least safe at night and I just needed to find somewhere safe to hang out.

Last time I got lucky with a flop house that was cheap but... Definitely a flop house. I couldn't imagine it right now though. Been sheltered for a few years now and it certainly does seem rougher and the weather less helpful.

I'm shocked Hoovervilles haven't made a return but land is a lot more private now and people are more willing to obey the law.

[-] roux@hexbear.net 8 points 3 months ago

Sounds like it's pretty much the same across the board then.

[-] Rom@hexbear.net 43 points 3 months ago

Reminder that the Bell Riots are scheduled for three weeks from now.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 months ago

We will bring them to fruition comrade 🤝

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago

Push that timeline until after 2028

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah due to the covid temporal anomaly.

[-] DefinitelyNotAPhone@hexbear.net 33 points 3 months ago

Give every homeless person an AR-15.

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Every person a rifle, every encampment 3-5 TOW missiles

[-] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 30 points 3 months ago

It's not just California, but it's crazy how much ammo the libs give fash (or even just fash energies within the completely apolitical) by steadfastly refusing to supply housing to homeless people.

Like they could enjoy a 1000-year reich if they would just build some dignified housing, but they're constitutionally unable to do the one simple (and not even that expensive) task that will actually address homelessness.

[-] ColonelKataffy@hexbear.net 22 points 3 months ago

in a state where every working class person is paying 50% of their income for a roof over their heads, hearing the democrats are giving free housing to """the undeserving poor""" may not be so popular. or maybe it would, idk anymore.

[-] T34_69@hexbear.net 8 points 3 months ago

The politicians themselves are landleeches and speculators

[-] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago

That's true, but homeless encampments are bad for property values

[-] LeninsBeard@hexbear.net 25 points 3 months ago

Bringing back the 80s-90s east coast-west coast rap rivalries except it's which Democratic Party can be more depraved.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 24 points 3 months ago

Surely one of these stones is filled with blood! Squeeze it harder!!

[-] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 17 points 3 months ago

You'd think chuds would be happier considering even their "opposition" gives them 99% of what they want.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I cannot express enough how completely disappointed I am with Newsom. While it was illegal to clear the camps, he was actually busting his ass to sweep away red tape that artificially restricts the supply of housing, and I was all for it. It's too bad he basically decided that the real solution was to go right back to our forty year history of playing whack a mole with camps. Surely if we just clear the camp one more time, install just one more set of homeless spikes, we'll fix the problem.

[-] culpritus@hexbear.net 14 points 3 months ago

pulling out the aviators to show how upset his is about not getting a shot as Dem Prez candidate, also being a ghoul to blow off steam

[-] Black_Mald_Futures@hexbear.net 10 points 3 months ago

Is he green-screened in there

[-] fubarx@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

It's really unfortunate that it has come to this. I've been handing out tents, sleeping bags, clothing, food, and donating money when I could for years. It feels like shoveling sand in front of a tsunami.

If anyone has a workable idea -- that hasn't already been tried -- on how to solve the homeless problem that is fair to the unhoused, local homeowners, business owners, towns, and taxpayers... now is the time to step up.

[-] wtypstanaccount04@hexbear.net 13 points 3 months ago

Imma be real with you chief: I don't give a flying fuck about business owners

[-] Edamamebean@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago

"Fair to business owners" go back to leddit liberal

this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
162 points (100.0% liked)

news

23553 readers
870 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS