130
submitted 1 year ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/news@hexbear.net
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] thebartermyth@hexbear.net 74 points 1 year ago

Terrifying and irrational state enemies are evil-y mustering their forces... Anyway, that's why the highest levels of our government secretly formed a plan to literally nuke their countries.

Perfect framing, thank you

Mallory Stewart, the assistant secretary for arms control, deterrence and stability at the State Department, said in an interview that the Chinese government is “actively preventing us from having conversations about the risks.” Instead, she said, Beijing “seems to be taking a page out of Russia’s playbook that, until we address tensions and challenges in our bilateral relationship, they will choose not to continue our arms control, risk reduction, and nonproliferation conversations.”

Gee, no clue why they wouldn't play ball.

deeply unserious

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

These people are genuinely insane. Pure apocalyptic demons. Even cartel drug lords will have more integrity when meeting with rivals to discuss conflict lol

[-] peeonyou@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

they won't continue arms control, risk reduction, and nonproliferation conversations because they don't want to just provide the US with all the information it needs to figure out how to wipe them out in a first strike

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

Not to mention the US cotes against anything that limits its arms. They tried to pass a resolution to “ban weapons in space” which Russia and China voted against because an older resolution already banned that while the US’ proposals added a bunch of bullshit that only benefits the US

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 71 points 1 year ago

nuke the harm reduction leaving my body

[-] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 52 points 1 year ago

Trump would've fired the same number of nukes + 1!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 71 points 1 year ago

Jokes aside (of which I'm sure this thread is aplenty), realistically if we're expecting to be at war with China, Russia and North Korea, you know whichever lunatic president is running the murderhouse is definitely going to fire first; if we're actually expecting wholeheartedly that there'll be a nuclear confrontation, the government will absolutely fire first because in a nuclear war you always want to be the first one to fire, and we'll be doing it with countries that genuinely don't even want any confrontation, let alone a nuclear one. To the government it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when (to fire first).

Living on the same planet as America must be like trying to have a nice meal in the vicinity of someone experiencing hyper roid rage.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 61 points 1 year ago

indeed America is the rabid dog of the global community

[-] OptimusSubprime@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Problem with that rabid dog is that once you go to shoot it, it's fleas launch from it and they somehow destroy you as well.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] TechnoUnionTypeBeat@hexbear.net 34 points 1 year ago

you know whichever lunatic president is running the murderhouse is definitely going to fire first

It will happen after the first American loss

Any war will begin with a propaganda campaign that will make the ravenous countrywide bloodthirst of 2001 look positively quaint. You'd see "reasonable liberal" reporters from the NYT and MSNBC on the verge of using slurs, while Fox is straight up calling for the annihilation of all [slurs]

The very second the first US carrier is sunk by a hypersonic missile is the second the US goes into full Khornate blood rage and the president, whoever they are, begins firing every last nuclear weapon at whoever sank the carrier

[-] Azarova@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

Living on the same planet as America must be like trying to have a nice meal in the vicinity of someone experiencing hyper roid rage.

Is this implying you're not from Earth? If so, get me the fuck out of here please

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 59 points 1 year ago

Flashback to yesterday when some lib ran wild saying just because Palantir said this same thing that it didn't mean anything

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 34 points 1 year ago

lol I remember that thread

[-] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

because Palantir said this same thing [...] it didn't mean anything

wut?

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 41 points 1 year ago

There was a post yesterday about statement from Palantir that said the same thing - that the US would face a three front war. Some lemmitor lib got real reddity about how it doesn't mean anything if Palantir says that because they're a private company and not the US government.

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

The wall between the government and the corporations that work for it is so thin it could be adequately described as vapor.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 22 points 1 year ago

Actually, the US government is five corporations in a trenchcoat.

[-] peeonyou@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

and the trenchcoat is unbuttoned and unbelted

[-] sexywheat@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

parenti during one of his speeches once said something to the tune of

The interests of the US government is not aligned with the arms manufacturers, it IS the arms manufacturers

[-] coolusername@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

Palantir spawned from in-q-t-el. It's literally CIA.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

Oh shit I kind wanna go message this to them

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

You should! Lol

[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

Just ping them in the thread!

[-] Ideology@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago

In the quest to turn the treat machine back on, our big smart boi billionaires consider playing with MAD.

[-] chickentendrils@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago

The shift comes as the Pentagon believes China’s stockpiles will rival the size and diversity of the United States’ and Russia’s over the next decade.

except much newer and probably likely to function if you start launching yours dipshit

Unfortunately it probably doesn't take many to start nuclear winter but how much responsibility do the networks of contractors and oligarchs scamming public funds hand over fist in every other area possibly take for stockpile maintenance? the things that end the world if used?

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 43 points 1 year ago

it really would be divine comedy if US tried to start a nuclear war and their nukes ended up failing to launch due to lack of maintenance and skills needed to keep them operational

[-] Volcatile@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

Who's to say it hasn't happened already?

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 year ago

as I recall two out of three recent launch tests did fail, so...

[-] joyhunter@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 year ago

Probably best case scenario as I struggle to see them not starting nuclear war. I mean, in practice they only have a 50% hit rate. Two in Japan and one in Spain. And the ones in Japan were fresh.

[-] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago

In the event that the nukes start flying as a result of Operation Corn Pop, I would just like to say that it has been an honor and a privilege posting with all of you ladies, m'theydies, and gentlesirs. rosa-salute

[-] riseuppikmin@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Thank you everyone here for both shit and effort posts if I don't make it through the nuclear bombings and fallout. If I do I will try to spread as much knowledge about post-bombing electronics and how to emulate on them as I can.

[-] bazingabrain@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago

Oh that’s not at all pant shittingly terrifying.

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

if these people are the ones drafting official plans, maybe there's hope the US would completely fail to persecute a nuclear war. fucks sake 4 years ago you didn't think the DPRK and China's nuclear programmes would be coordinated? that if nukes were flying toward Russia through Chinese territory the yanks could just pinky-promise to China they're for Russia and they'd keep theirs away?

so goddamned foolish. i think you could sell half the pentagon and their 'think tanks' the brooklyn bridge. simultaneously.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 1 year ago

yeah these people are utter imbeciles, and that's the scariest part of all this

[-] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

Can't launch the nukes, the parliamentarian is out to lunch in Manchin's mansion

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] GeorgeZBush@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago

This is the endgame for the ruling class. This is what all of this is leading to: planetary suicide.

[-] Cammy@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

They want to end the game with the high score.

[-] Hexbear2@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Reminder that China only pursued nukes after the US threatened to nuke Fujian province during the second Taiwan straight crises. So I guess the chickens came home to roost once again. Also, down with war mongers. China was first to make the no first use pledge 60 years ago, why won't the US to this day?

This wasn't an idle threat either by the US, they had Nike Hercules missiles, capable of carrying nuclear warheads, on the island of Taiwan.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Tofu_Lewis@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

Not to add to the scary factor, and probably not related, and completely unverified: a work colleague who was a specialist in a military branch was recalled recently and were supposed to be back by now but apparently they may not be back for an undetermined amount of time.......

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Well that's not concerning at all. Although this could very much be related to Israel doing everything they can to start a war with Iran.

[-] TheModerateTankie@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

Trump is the insane one, btw

[-] CredibleBattery@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
130 points (99.2% liked)

news

24540 readers
589 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS