86

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is floating Elon Musk to be Speaker of the House after the powerful, billionaire tech businessman helped torpedo a bipartisan agreement on a short-term spending bill.

Why it matters: He's the first GOP lawmaker to explicitly suggest Musk should be Speaker, and his comments come as Speaker Mike Johnson's (R-La.) bid to keep his job is under serious threat.

Musk has already emerged as one of the most powerful voices in politics, and has become one of President-elect Trump's closest confidants.

What he's saying: "Nothing would disrupt the swamp more than electing Elon Musk," Paul posted on X on Thursday morning. "[T]hink about it . . . nothing's impossible. (not to mention the joy at seeing the collective establishment, aka 'uniparty,' lose their ever-lovin' minds)"

Between the lines: The Constitution does not specify that the Speaker of the House has to be a member of the chamber — though they always have been.

non-representative names have been floated over the years during Speaker elections. paul has long been an advocate for slashing government spending, though he is in the wrong chamber to have much say over who will win the Speakers' gavel in January's floor vote. Trump, meanwhile, told Fox News Digital on Thursday morning that Johnson will "easily remain speaker" if he "acts decisively and tough" and eliminates "all of the traps being set by Democrats" in the spending package.

top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Crucible@hexbear.net 84 points 1 day ago

The speaker being the third in line to the presidency but not needing to be an elected representative is such a blatant loophole it feels like it's been left there as a just in case someone wants to do a proper coup someday

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 37 points 1 day ago

How does it work with non-citizen though?

[-] jack@hexbear.net 46 points 1 day ago

I suppose theoretically he'd be skipped, but in reality they'd just waive that because he has Super Citizen status

[-] T34_69@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

maybe they'd give him an "temporary" title like Interim Executive Administrator or CEO of America

[-] jack@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

Retroactive "Founder" just like Tesla

[-] edge@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He'd be skipped over because he's not natural born.

Which would mean second in line goes to the position that's by tradition given to the longest serving member of the Senate majority party, i.e. one of the oldest.

[-] Wakmrow@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

The speaker is an elected representative though

[-] Leon_Grotsky@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago

They are elected in the sense that the House representatives vote on confirming a nomination, but there is nothing to stipulate the nominee has to be a representative. That has just been the precedent so far.

[-] edge@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

The US Speaker of the House is as democratically elected as any Prime Minister.

but there is nothing to stipulate the nominee has to be a representative. That has just been the precedent so far.

The same is true for the British PM and I would guess many other PMs.

[-] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I thought so too, but no. It seems that way because the House traditionally chooses an elected rep to serve in the role, but you don't actually need to be a member of the House to be Speaker, the House can choose whoever they want to serve in that role

The Speaker is the only House officer who traditionally has been chosen from the sitting membership of the House. Manual Sec. 26. The Constitution does not limit his selection [the Speaker] from among that class, but the practice has been followed invariably. The Speaker's term of office thus expires at the end of his term of office as a Member, whereas the other House officers continue in office ``until their successors are chosen and qualified.'

They almost definitely won't do this for Musk, but they could

[-] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

not in this scenario

[-] btbt@hexbear.net 41 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is, completely unironically, what the Founding Fathers wanted

[-] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's a reason the Constitution was written by a couple hundred of the richest, most powerful men, secluded from everyone else, and presented as a feint accompli to a weary population.

I like to ask my most patriotic family members, if they would accept a modern Constitution written by Elon Musk, Mitch McConnell, Nancy pelosi, The Walton family, and George Soros. In secret. If they think such a document could truly protect their liberty. If they think such a document would actually safeguard them?

And if not. Why CAN they trust the 18th century equivalent of Peter Thiel?

To quote Stafford Beer, “the purpose of a system is what it does”!

[-] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 50 points 1 day ago

no chance Elan Munk would take a role requiring any sort of responsibility in group processes/protocols. he is way too aggressively stupid to have the capacity for it and would never even try to learn. nor would he accept some junior bodyman standing there whispering what he needs to do next.

the guy is way too egomaniacal to be in a room that has rules for when to talk and when to shut up. even reading his court transcripts made it obvious how much he resented being temporarily, narrowly subjected to a far more simple version.

[-] axont@hexbear.net 37 points 1 day ago

He'd have to attend the state of the union too and just sit there for an hour, which is kinda funny to think about

[-] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 15 points 1 day ago

He would absolutely bring a laptop and start playing Diablo.

[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago

no chance Elan Munk would take a role requiring any sort of responsibility in group processes/protocols.

this exact same sentiment is true about donald trump but that certainly hasn't stopped him.

[-] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago

This is why Donald Trump has never run for a legislative seat.

There's a big difference between chief executive, and legislator. One at least needs a passing familiarity with parliamentarian rules, motions, objections, that sort of nerd shit. The other needs to be able to make speeches, and act as a figurehead.

That being said, I fully support Elon Musk becoming speaker of the House. Watching him crash&burn will bring me so much joy.

[-] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago

being president of the US or of a company doesn't have group organizing protocols. one just can run their mouth and make pronouncements.

[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

sure, but that's what that parliamentarian loser is there for anyway. it's not like the speaker is always a lawyer who's memorized robert's rules or whatever. but that's regardless of what i intend my broader point to be, which is while it's true he wouldn't like the role, he's also far too stupid to know that.

[-] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago

Actual hell. It may be entertaining, I guess.

[-] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 34 points 1 day ago

Deeply unserious party. It’s a real shame Rand Paul’s neighbour didn’t finish the job when he had a chance.

[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 40 points 1 day ago

Real "the rules don't say a dog can't play basketball" energy.

[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 31 points 1 day ago

Dude your whole country is just a clown show of idiocy.

[-] miz@hexbear.net 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

imagine being a vassal to an empire this fuckin' stupid

Can't even find a decent culture to be colonized by!

[-] Des@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

lol i literally just posted about the libertarians going full mask off corrupt "authoritarian" after someone said we should just take the ideology back for the left again

do it do it do it i want people to associate it with a cartoon DOGE with Elon's face booting stomping everyone with less then 50 million net worth

[-] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 28 points 1 day ago

Rand Paul floats ~~Elon Musk for House Speaker~~

He's a witch! meow-cactus

[-] RION@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago

He came down in a BUBBLE, doug

[-] Taster_Of_Treats@hexbear.net 3 points 22 hours ago

The speaker of the house has to actually do work though, something musk is incapable of.

[-] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 29 points 1 day ago
[-] kleeon@hexbear.net 21 points 1 day ago

those clowns in congress did it again!

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 15 points 1 day ago

What a bunch of clowns

[-] geese_feces@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago

Elon would find the job too boring and would try to appoint the Grok AI chatbot to be speaker for him.

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 23 points 1 day ago

but he can't speak and doesn't know his offspring masturbatory habits ohnoes

[-] abc@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago

timmy-pray please please it would be so funny

[-] Sphere@hexbear.net 21 points 1 day ago

This feels like a jock from a rival high school telling the local team who to pick for their captain. I have trouble believing they're gonna take marching orders from any Senator, much less Rand Paul

[-] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 1 points 19 hours ago

Only in costume libertarian-approaching

[-] SuperZutsuki@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago

Don't worry! You just need to vote in four years and Kamala will fix everything!

[-] miz@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago
[-] GoodGuyWithACat@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

Musk must have some compromising videos of Rand or something.

[-] SoyViking@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

It would be really funny but not for the emerald boy

[-] Coolkidbozzy@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

booo make trump the speaker and musk the parliamentarian

this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
86 points (100.0% liked)

news

23638 readers
770 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS