133
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I’m assuming US job market. I googled around and found this that seems to be where that statistic comes from

Frankly I still don’t believe it or consider it alarming. Even at face value, if it’s a difference of 6% and 8% unemployment, it is not that meaningful. It’s still 92% vs 94% employment. Once employed, a physicist can expect a good or great salary. Lifetime earnings are great even if it can be hard for some people to find a job straight out of college. Everyone in my program is gainfully employed, usually not as an academic, but in software development, engineering, finance, or education. It’s far from a “do not recommend” field even if the latest CNN fad is to doom and gloom about the fall of STEM (usually simultaneously hyping AI as the replacement, which is rubbish)

Consider the rise of LLMs. Because it is a novel field, there are not many people with an education tailored it. Physicists are generalists. That makes them desired for industries in uncharted territory where a strong analytical and theoretical mindset is more important than a particular certification or knowledge of a computer program.

[-] LaughingLion@hexbear.net 1 points 15 hours ago

this number changes yearly. physicist is often the worst employed.

and when talking about large populations and unemployment the difference between 6% and 8% is MASSIVE

also anthropology being #1 is no surprise i actually know someone with a masters in it. went to a specialized school abroad and everything. she is a librarian now. completely respectable field and she enjoys it. but it is not in her field whatsoever

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
133 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13940 readers
781 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS